Is it terrible that I actually enjoyed the Laurence Olivier clip from Sky Captain? Not that it makes any sense to insist on using archival footage of a man who was dead for 15 years before the movie was even dreamed up (though I guess it's cheaper when you don't have to actually pay one of the most celebrated Shakespearean actors of the 20th century to be in your movie); but if they had to do it, that was a pretty interesting way to go.Suskie said:Also, let's hope The Dark Knight Rises doesn't wind up on this list:
http://www.cracked.com/article_18659_6-insane-attempts-to-make-movies-starring-dead-movie-stars.html
Honestly, I thought that the Scarecrow crossover was actually the weakest part of The Dark Knight. It didn't move the story forward; it didn't give me any new information about the character that I hadn't already gotten from the first movie; and it was over in no time, with no further mention made of the man who had been one of the primary villains of the last film. It just felt completely out of place; the scene read to me like a gratuitous platform for Batman to begin his trademark ass-kickings. Personally, I don't want Nolan to repeat this type of attempted crossover with Ledger's Joker, especially since it would have to be a smoke and mirrors job anyway. Ledger's Joker was a phenomenal performance; let's allow it to stand on its own.Greg Tito said:Christopher Nolan did a great job bridging his first reboot Batman film, Batman Begins, with the second film, The Dark Knight, by showing the villain Scarecrow being captured early on in the sequel.
Wait, Ra's Al'Ghul was in the Dark Knight Returns? I thought that was some other guy and not that "Immortal" from the comics... You know, I don't really see why they dont want to cast a new guy for Jokers Re-Appearances or whatever you want to call them. It may seem insensitive, but people die, sometimes unexpectedly. You cant put something on halt, or cease it entirely everytime somebody dies. Heck, I think the original actor that played Dumbledore in the Harry Potter movies died at some point... I think maybe the third movie? Get over it.Jamboxdotcom said:i don't see the point of having Joker in the next movie at all. i loved Ledger as Joker, and don't think anyone could top his role, but why have him in the next movie? to cheesily boost your draw? Nolan's too good a director to go that route, imo. i don't recall seeing Ra's al'Ghul in Dark Knight Returns.
There was alot of press that came out from Nolan's camp a couple months after Ledger's death regarding that they had several extra hours of Joker footage that didn't go in the movie. I wouldn't doubt that part of this might have been the Harley Quinn origin arc, footage of him in Arkham, or extra heist/crime footage. More than likely enough to get a few minutes of Joker footage, with only a few scenes of cgi necessary to fill the gaps. If the young version of Jeff Bridges from the new Tron is any indication, cgi is more than capable of creating believable stand ins. All they really need is some voice-overs from someone that can do Ledger's Joker for the CGI scenes and you have continuity.rsvp42 said:I heard from a friend (who apparently knew someone on the set) that there was a lot of extra Joker footage that was shot, but was never incorporated into the film. Supposedly, it was enough to build a whole 'nother film around, but obviously Ledger's death would probably keep that from working properly (scene-to-scene continuity, edits, rewrites). However, if that's true, then there might be enough for at least a scene of his incarceration, with a little CGI to patch up anything that doesn't quite work. I'd love to see that, if only to help tie things up a bit.
/rumor