The "Damaged" tattoo looks incredibly dumb, but I quite like the rest of it. I did laugh at this redesign though.
That's the possible origin story offered in Alan Moore's The Killing Joke, though rather than a thug, he was a family man driven to crime by desperation.Ugicywapih said:I've never really been into superheroes, but one of my highschool mates was a huge Batman fanboy and from what I remember, wasn't Joker's origin story, that he was basically your regular thug and then Batman kicked him into a vat of acid or something, which coloured Joker's skin white, because that's how severe chemical burns work, obviously, and that new clownish look triggered a personality change, like with Scarface?
That made me lawl.Ugicywapih said:Ah well, I guess we just don't get the new joker. And neither does his mum.
No. I don't think anyone actually defines it as edgy. It feels like DC are trying to make it edgy but were 10 years too late and it would've looked terrible back then too. You are aware what people mean when they quite clearly call something sarcastically "edgy" yes? Would you rather people just say "ugh it's shit" without explaining why?LeathermanKick25 said:Really? This is what you all define as "edgy" ? I know it's cool to hate on all the DC casting and character looks, but you're all pretty sad with the lame insults you're slinging at it.
Never fail to amuse me Escapist.
I am a big Batman fan. Yeah, not too happy. But honestly, if they just nix the tattoos, the rest would be good, actually. He's got the right build, the coloration is good (pale skin, bright hair and lips), has a good manic look, but can't tell if he can pull off the creepy/scary/psycho evil yet from a single still. Like someone else mentioned, the teeth do look like someone whose been on the receiving end of Batman's boot a few times already.LostGryphon said:This could just be a selfie of some industrial raver on a saturday night right as the molly kicks in.
Give him some green and purple glowsticks, then the look would be complete.
Not at all a fan. Hell. The cartoons were evil clownish, yet classy, with a good blend of traits. The early movies tended to lean a lot more clownish and downplayed the psycho side. The Dark Knight had the psychotic anarchic side down fuckin' pat, with the clown bit barely being represented at all.
This?
No. Just no. And I'm not even a big Batman fan. Those folks have to be...well, incredulous at best.