I agree that he may be overexaggerating on the IQ bit. However, I agree that it seems like this scene was put in just for the sake of having a sex scene. I think he's referring to the intelligence (or lack thereof) one must possess to buy or at least rate a game as better than it actually is just because of the fact that there's a sex scene in it. And I'd agree, for the most part. I'd have very little respect for someone who told me GoW 3 was "awsum" because there was sex in it. And, judging by how much focus is being directed to the fact that there is a sex scene, it's details, what is it going to include, etc, it's not unfair to assume that many people are going to fall under the above category.IamQ said:The IQ of the entire mankind has been lowerd because of a sex scene? How is that possible?SakSak said:....
*sigh*
the collective IQ mankind has apparently dropped another dozen or so points since the last time I looked.
Indeed, what is the point? Besides to use digital lesbians and rendered breasts to make a ludicrous amount of money more than what GoW III would have already made. Honestly, I feel ashamed by association to belong to the male side of humanity, because I know not just one, or two, but several cpies of the game will be sold based on that alone.
Just when I was hoping that humanity might have some hope after all... But no, implication of sex and a poor female actor voicing some uuhs and aahhs is still a surefire way to make bucketloads of money from gamers.