Much like the gamers who are into these kinds of things, the harem maidens apparently like to watch overmuch.
i don't think it's stupid, devs know people will pay money for digitalized boobs and spent about a day programing all that. tell me, who is stupider? the people who make tons of $$$ for programing that, or the people paying for it?SakSak said:....
*sigh*
the collective IQ mankind has apparently dropped another dozen or so points since the last time I looked.
Indeed, what is the point? Besides to use digital lesbians and rendered breasts to make a ludicrous amount of money more than what GoW III would have already made. Honestly, I feel ashamed by association to belong to the male side of humanity, because I know not just one, or two, but several cpies of the game will be sold based on that alone.
Just when I was hoping that humanity might have some hope after all... But no, implication of sex and a poor female actor voicing some uuhs and aahhs is still a surefire way to make bucketloads of money from gamers.
Oh I know. Believe me, I know. Perhaps, upon rereading your own statement and the post of mine you responded to, you can begin to understand why I said what I did? Because you have just answered your own question.LWS666 said:i don't think it's stupid, devs know people will pay money for digitalized boobs and spent about a day programing all that. tell me, who is stupider? the people who make tons of $$$ for programing that, or the people paying for it?SakSak said:the collective IQ of mankind has apparently dropped another dozen or so points since the last time I looked.
and if you're watching this you have the internet. if you have the internet you can get gigabytes of free porn, making you even stupider if you pay $40-60 just for that.
I don't see how the consumer is acting stupidly. The game is a form of entertainment. If people want some sexual content with their entertainment, so be it. It's their money and therefore they can choose to buy whatever entertainment they believe they will derive the most pleasure from. If a game contains sexual content and the consumer wants sexual content, its a win-win situation. If you dislike the sexual content in the game because you find it demeaning, buy a different game.SakSak said:Oh I know. Believe me, I know. Perhaps, upon rereading your own statement and the post of mine you responded to, you can begin to understand why I said what I did? Because you have just answered your own question.LWS666 said:i don't think it's stupid, devs know people will pay money for digitalized boobs and spent about a day programing all that. tell me, who is stupider? the people who make tons of $$$ for programing that, or the people paying for it?SakSak said:the collective IQ of mankind has apparently dropped another dozen or so points since the last time I looked.
and if you're watching this you have the internet. if you have the internet you can get gigabytes of free porn, making you even stupider if you pay $40-60 just for that.
Or to put it more clearly: "who is stupider? ...or the people paying for it" -> "IQ of mankind has apparently dropped another dozen or so points"
Do you see it? The implied thought process that was behind my statement?
Speaking of which, whatever happened to the ASCII-grip controller for the PS1? (you know, the one you could use just one-handed, primarily suited for RPG-games á la Final Fantasy)XJ-0461 said:Well, at least this game will lead to more people who can use a controller with one hand.
[sup]I apologise for that. But I just had to say it.[/sup]
For someone who calls themselves SakSak, you are really making a big fuss over a little sex scene. Lets get some things straight. First of all, every sex scene doesn't need add anything to the gameplay, character development, or anything else. It is there to give the consumer what they want. In this case, a lot of violence and sex. Secondly, this clip won't lower anyone's IQ. If it did, the internet would rendered all of mankind unable to function let alone with its near infinite amount of porn. Finally, why should the fact that some people might like this clip be a bad thing? Flame wars already lower IQ and I doubt this clip will stay in anyone mind long enough to gain a real fanbase. It is okay if you don't like it, but don't treat it like it is a threat to humanity. It is just more porn. CHILL!SakSak said:Quite possibly, but what is the point? Why spend money and time and effort on that?IamQ said:I think you're taking it a bit too seriusly. They probably only did it in the first god of war, because they thought it was funny. Then, as time went by, it was featured in Gow 2, so now it's become sort of a tradition in the series.
How does it improve the gameplay? How does it advance the story? How does it add depth to the storytelling or characters?
GoW III will hardly be the perfect game when it comes out: no game is. And instead of polishing it, perhaps making the story a little more engaging or adding another attack to the repertoire of Kratos...
They used time and resources for that. And everyone will either think it as an excellent fan-yay moment or be too busy fapping to think of anything.
The fapping part won't, not by itself, in that you are right. It is simply that it is indicative that poorly-executed, unrealistic clip about sex is still all that is needed for some to throw away their money. Seriously, it's like no-ones seen a half-naked woman before. What lowers the IQ is that that short clip will be enough to spark flame-wars, will feature in a lot of wet dreams and that a fanbase will grow around that short, pointless, poorly executed clip that adds nothing of value and fails to qualify as art.Besides, even if people would be fapping like crazy over them, it wouldn't lower their IQ.
Wait, what?Playbahnosh said:Boobies and suggested sex are an important part of society. It's about time the industry recognized that.