I kind of liked the trailer, there's something about religious figures getting brutally murdered that brings a smile to my face.
Hmmmm. Your comment about the brofists is leading me to think we might all be better at noticing things that apply to our own genders more. I certainly still see a lot of overly sexualised women in games, whereas I hadn't necessarily picked up on the stuff you have so much.Abandon4093 said:The thing is it's not 'this again' because we generally don't see it anymore. Lately it's all been slightly homo-erotic brofists and grizzled man time.
It's rare to find this kind of over the top sexy for the sake of sexy....... outside of Japan anyway. But that's a whole different argument.
I don't know about the use of the word "pander." I think in many cases the games industry does pander to the desires of the stereotypical teenage boy. That's not a bad thing in and of itself, but when it feels like the whole industry is doing just that (hyperbole, obviously) it can feel uncomfortable.I hate that word... pander. It's almost never used correctly.
Making something that looks cool or is hot isn't pandering. It's appealing to a market. And whilst it's true that too much sex appeal, especially the in your face stuff like this, is a bad thing. None at all is a much worse thing.
Handling sexuality in a mature fashion is certainly not abstaining from it. Thinking like that is very unhealthy.
It is the main selling point of the trailer though, and would give that impression to someone who's not familiar with the series.I'd hardly say it was the main selling point here. It's just eyecandy for the trailer.
Agreed, again.And I'm glad you're not one of the people who thinks that any sexuality is inherently a bad thing. Because like I said, that's a very unhealthy way to look at it.
Perhaps. Tarantino generally does a decent job of characterising his sexy women though.Would you call Kill Bill immature?
Fair point.It's just pulp trash, there's a time and place for it but it's still enjoyable.
Again, I'd really disagree here. I'd say practically dressed, non overly sexualised (doesn't have to mean unsexy) women are still rare in games.But it isn't, we've moved away from this type of marketing being the standard. Now it's just nice to have the odd piece of it lying around here and there.
While I agree that people shouldn't be embarrassed to discuss sex, I wouldn't exactly call our culture "prudish" given what most of our media looks like.I disagree, I think sexualisation is a fantastic thing. Our western culture is far, far, far too prudish. Despite how good of a marketing tool sex is. We're still embarrassed about it in public and that's downright shameful.
Oh, I totally agree that we need more variety for everyone. I just think you're more likely to see (for example) an overweight male character than an overweight female character. And heaven forbid you might want to see a muscular woman... While the musclebound hulk of a man is indeed hideously overused, there are examples of variation. The supermodel look is more or less universal for female characters in games as 99 times out of 100 they're designed with sex appeal in mind.Again I'd disagree. As a male you're constantly told that being well muscled is the ideal. And although I am completely for sexualisation. I think it needs to be far more varied for both sexes.
So it insulted your religion. So what?NvrPhazed said:I actually have two problems with this. First of all I think it is degrading to women and if it was supposed to be a parody, it did not come through because it seemed like it was all serious business. Secondly, I find it sacrilegious because having the sisters show up as nuns and take off their clothes to reveal stripper outfits upsets me as a christian. If they revealed that they were carrying appropriate clothing and weaponry for a fight, I wouldn't have as much problem. The sexy nun outfit, I believe, is an insult to my religion because nuns are some of the best human beings on this Earth and to show them as being sex fiends underneath it all shows a great disrespect for what they do. That is why I am angry people.
You have can at least blend in with a suit. It's also the go to outfit for spies and assassins according to the movies, so it fits. But come on, bondage gear?mindlesspuppet said:This is the biggest issue I've had with the whole argument over the video. Everyone seems to be questioning "why were they dressed like that to assassinate someone?" yet no one questions "why is he wearing a formal suit to assassinate someone?". The answer to both questions is the same, but only one is being asked.Wolfram23 said:I don't see the issue with the nun outfits. That's a pretty good cover up.
But why they were dressed as strippers or whatever in order to assassinate someone is pretty dumb.
They should have pulled a Neo where they rip off the nun outfits and are just loaded up with weapons - and appropriate clothes for a gun fight.
But whatever.
Side note: The sexy nun as killers/killers disguised as nuns or priests thing has been done so many damn times in cinema that it really shouldn't have even garnered any attention. This just goes to show how immature the gaming media is.
An excellent point. It really is interesting how the male equivalent is just patently ridiculous even for video games, whereas the current version is considered normal.orangeban said:If it were men being beaten up who approached in Pope robes and then dropped them to reveal gimp suits or whatever, well, A) that wouldn't happen, which is part of the reason why the trailer was offensive, this kind of thing doesn't happen to men, and B) people would call that out as fucking ridiculous.
It was further excarbated by people already anxious for the Hitman franchise to not become the latest on-rails spectacle shooter. If they'd have shown him skilfully sneaking around, strangling nun-clad assassins, nobody would've lifted an eyebrow.Tomeran said:Although I think it was a bit silly(the undergarments, not the nun outfits), and not really representive of the hitman series, I think this has been way overblown. Way worse things then this are done on a daily basis in the gaming industry and it doesnt recive an ounce of the attention this has gotten. A true example of making a chicken farm out of a feather, and just badly placed priorities.
Exactly, Saints Row has ridiculous and over-the-top stuff like that, because it's a ridiculous and over-the-top game. Hitman is not over-the-top and ridiculous, not really.Eamar said:An excellent point. It really is interesting how the male equivalent is just patently ridiculous even for video games, whereas the current version is considered normal.orangeban said:If it were men being beaten up who approached in Pope robes and then dropped them to reveal gimp suits or whatever, well, A) that wouldn't happen, which is part of the reason why the trailer was offensive, this kind of thing doesn't happen to men, and B) people would call that out as fucking ridiculous.
The only way I can imagine this happening would be if it was Saints Row or something. But then it would be played for laughs, not sex appeal.
Pretty certain that anything made out of skin-tight, form-fitting materials is the go to outfit for female spies and assassins according to the movies as well. And really, bondage gear? Just because something is tight and black does not make it bondage gear.Sean951 said:You have can at least blend in with a suit. It's also the go to outfit for spies and assassins according to the movies, so it fits. But come on, bondage gear?mindlesspuppet said:This is the biggest issue I've had with the whole argument over the video. Everyone seems to be questioning "why were they dressed like that to assassinate someone?" yet no one questions "why is he wearing a formal suit to assassinate someone?". The answer to both questions is the same, but only one is being asked.Wolfram23 said:I don't see the issue with the nun outfits. That's a pretty good cover up.
But why they were dressed as strippers or whatever in order to assassinate someone is pretty dumb.
They should have pulled a Neo where they rip off the nun outfits and are just loaded up with weapons - and appropriate clothes for a gun fight.
But whatever.
Side note: The sexy nun as killers/killers disguised as nuns or priests thing has been done so many damn times in cinema that it really shouldn't have even garnered any attention. This just goes to show how immature the gaming media is.
Sigh. No it was shit on so many levels.Graill said:The trailer was fine. There are simply too many religious fanatics around.
I have no particular problem with a Nun's Habit as a disguise a long as it makes sense in context. Hasn't 42 dressed as a priest on occasion?mindlesspuppet said:This is the biggest issue I've had with the whole argument over the video. Everyone seems to be questioning "why were they dressed like that to assassinate someone?" yet no one questions "why is he wearing a formal suit to assassinate someone?". The answer to both questions is the same, but only one is being asked.Wolfram23 said:I don't see the issue with the nun outfits. That's a pretty good cover up.
But why they were dressed as strippers or whatever in order to assassinate someone is pretty dumb.
They should have pulled a Neo where they rip off the nun outfits and are just loaded up with weapons - and appropriate clothes for a gun fight.
But whatever.
Side note: The sexy nun as killers/killers disguised as nuns or priests thing has been done so many damn times in cinema that it really shouldn't have even garnered any attention. This just goes to show how immature the gaming media is.
I have no problems with a hit team, consisting entirely of women dressed as nuns, being in a computer game.Graill said:The trailer was fine. There are simply too many religious fanatics around.
Death of a Showman: He wears his suit into an abandoned amusement park run by gangsters and two-bit crooks.WaysideMaze said:A man in a suit doesn't attract attention. just another face in the crowd. 7 attractive women in s&m gear is the opposite.mindlesspuppet said:This is the biggest issue I've had with the whole argument over the video. Everyone seems to be questioning "why were they dressed like that to assassinate someone?" yet no one questions "why is he wearing a formal suit to assassinate someone?". The answer to both questions is the same, but only one is being asked.
I love Monty Python, I guess why I liked this trailer just because of it being silly.Shocksplicer said:The only problem with it is that it was silly to the point of fucking stupid.
That is all.