Questions being: Is it fair? and Should they put a Random chance system in a game of FAIR FIGHT. Since none of them have really been answered yet, i stand by what i have written, you haven't responded to it yet.dathwampeer said:It's still an irrelevant point. I didn't say 'It could happen'.Akalistos said:Yeah? Because i hope you knew that! I have responded to a post saying: It could happen. We are talking about video games, it may be cool to see that in real life... but the point of a game is to entertain. It's not entertaining if it happen in game. So why counter with "it happen"?dathwampeer said:I'm just going to sum up.Akalistos said:snip
You then began to lecture me on the events that took place in the video I posted.There's a difference between a game and real life (Hope you know that).
And, i still asked you what the point. If you go back, you'll see I wrote 2 distinct questions that need answering.
I said 'It makes it realistic'. Difference being it does happen. And adding it into the game add's realism. Fight night tries to be realistic. Therefore that's a plus to it's demographic.
Also. I did answer your questions. You just conveniently omitted it.
2) It was likely a haymaker. This games equivalent of a lucky shot. It's a high risk attack that if successfully landed acts as if it's a surprise or unexpected power hit. How much damage these do is pretty much random. Which is a good thing.
I can concur with you on the realism of the thing. It's not a bad thing making a game more realist. The point is, a game is a way to evade, to change reality. You don't wanna play Joe Vascal's Day at the Office 3 - Out of Toner!!!. You want to play something that you haven't see everyday. (Which is funny... There's no athlete that play sport game because it's to close to their life as it is.)
When you play a fighting game, Fairness is EVERYTHING. Think about this for a second (if your not a Spammer): How many time have you play any Street Fighter with people that pick Ken (or Ryu) and spam the Hadouken? Is it fair? No... it's not. It's the same thing. The only difference is that you can't do it on purpose, but that doesn't mean that it's change what it is. It's a Insta-win move.
And here's the problem with it. You say it depend on factors. Can't they make some specific factor (other than luck) To activate it? Remember about the Kill move of Guilty Gears i speak to you about? Insta-win if you pull it off, Impossible to hide what your trying to accomplish (since you glow like a Christmas tree) and you loose abilities ( Tension bar is gone for the match, not the round.) Like your biggest attack. In a sense, couldn't they turn it into a move that you can only accomplish if you hit the Uppercut right the second the opponent stop blocking and is just about to go out of the animation? That would make it fair. Better yet, you fail and you are open for a haymaker yourself. Now that's pretty fair.dathwampeer said:I'll explain further. -Snip- [Wow, it's like speaking about the greatest film and he pull a book... Sorry, but I know what a Haymaker is. Now, go back on topic!!!! - Akalistos]
A haymaker. (Which this likely was) is a valid part of the game. And it's varying level of power dependant on many factors, adds to the games realism. I don't think I could explain it any better than that.
And you got your REALIST move while taking random chance out of the equation. Yeah Me!