Not for the quality of picture, it's only important because the text is far too small to read on standard def for most new games. It's daft.
Using that logic you should only ever eat out of garbage cans. And don't ever drive a car, because it'll make walking feel like you're a caveman.AnarchistFish said:HD is a waste of time. It's looks great for about a week but then you get used to it and all it does in the long run is cost more money and mean that when you watch things on lower quality settings, they seem worse quality than they did when you only had that. It's a waste of time and money.
This. I know it's the sort of thing that gets console gamers crying about PC elitists, but seriously, even a phone can have an 'HD' screen these days, it's just TVs that are playing catch-up. I've never been excited about HD as I've been gaming on a 1920x1200 resolution display for a full 4-5 years now, so the introduction of a 1920x1080 now screen doesn't exactly 'wow' me.Plinglebob said:Sorry to be picky, but what resolution is your monitor? If its 1024×768 or more, its HD, even if its a CRT monitor. PCs, HD Gaming since 1994!w9496 said:It's not very important to me at all. Up until 2 years ago I never owned anything HD, and I couldn't care less if it is or not. Right now I'm typing on a standard-definition monitor, while my brother is playing Gears on an HD monitor.
The same can be said about colour TV.AnarchistFish said:HD is a waste of time. It's looks great for about a week but then you get used to it and all it does in the long run is cost more money and mean that when you watch things on lower quality settings, they seem worse quality than they did when you only had that. It's a waste of time and money.
No, because HD isn't necessary or particularly noticeable. Driving a car actually has a long term use.crotchdot said:Using that logic you should only ever eat out of garbage cans. And don't ever drive a car, because it'll make walking feel like you're a caveman.AnarchistFish said:HD is a waste of time. It's looks great for about a week but then you get used to it and all it does in the long run is cost more money and mean that when you watch things on lower quality settings, they seem worse quality than they did when you only had that. It's a waste of time and money.
Again, it's still more noticeable. You could say that, but you'd actually be losing out long term if you didn't switch to colour.Casual Shinji said:The same can be said about colour TV.AnarchistFish said:HD is a waste of time. It's looks great for about a week but then you get used to it and all it does in the long run is cost more money and mean that when you watch things on lower quality settings, they seem worse quality than they did when you only had that. It's a waste of time and money.
It wasn't important to me until i first experienced it, then I simply couldn't go back.w9496 said:It's not very important to me at all. Up until 2 years ago I never owned anything HD, and I couldn't care less if it is or not. Right now I'm typing on a standard-definition monitor, while my brother is playing Gears on an HD monitor.
PC gamers played games in HD before it was cool.Griffolion said:As usual, the PC crowd are far ahead of the mainstream.