I love HD, it makes everything look that bit more appealing. I don't mind low definition, but if HD is available, i'll take it.
1400 dollars ?!?!?!? How in the pikey Hell are you posting on this board from the year 2003? Fella, I have to say I bought my last 42" 1080p Hi Def TV for my bedroom, brand new no less, for under $500 shipped to my door. Hell I have a 60" HDTV in my living room and that wasn't even a grand over a year ago. The entry point for high definition is crazy low these days. If you don't need but a 28 or 32 inch high def television you can get into one of those for about 200 bucks, give or take, with a little smart online shopping.jasen said:not even slightly i play my Xbox 360 on a regular definition TV ind I'm fine with it. I have played on a hdtv before and it does look allot nicer but its not worth the $1400 investment.
This. I agree completely with you.Alfador_VII said:HD is one of those things you can live without indefinitely if you haven't seen it.
But once you start watching HD TV shows in particular, you very quickly start noticing how bad SD looks![]()
I always forget to take my glasses to the cinema, so quality increases aren't noticeable over the blur.Boris Goodenough said:You've never been to the cinema the last couple of years?Susurrus said:I, cunningly, have never seen anything in HD (or Blu Ray, or anything), ever.
This is fantastic. It means I don't realize about the lost quality, and I can't see it. This means I have no interest in it, and am not bothered when watching something on a standard tv, at standard definition. Hooray! This has saved me many moneys.
if an image is designed to be viewed in high def it's very important to me, if it's an old 8-bit game then who cares?w9496 said:It's not very important to me at all. Up until 2 years ago I never owned anything HD, and I couldn't care less if it is or not. Right now I'm typing on a standard-definition monitor, while my brother is playing Gears on an HD monitor.