It's not grotesque or disgusting, it's just stupid. It's a dumb horror movie straight out of the cliche playbook with one weak idea to hold it up. The sequel will probably be just as bad.
Human Centipede II Refused U.K. Classification
- Thread starter vansau
- Start date
Recommended Videos
the thing the op didnt mention is that the raping of the women in the centipede involves barbwire and the other rear hole(check the bbfc description on there site it covers exactly what the sequance involves) so yeah i completly fail to see how the director can claim thats art when even pron companies wouldnt go that far in a sex act(and some have gone pretty damn close), kinda hope this film gets banned or cut to ribbons in most countries if only so it becomes that much harder for people to find torrents once it finally does get a release.
If its banned in the UK its DEFINITELY not making it to Australia..which i am very glad about...now i won;t have to listen to fuckwits tell me how awesome it is
Why the fuck did he have to say My Little Pony!?! I'll never be able to look at Pinkie Pie the same ever again!!!
OT:
The first film had no reason to be made and neither does this one.
edit:
in my opinion
OT:
The first film had no reason to be made and neither does this one.
edit:
in my opinion
Hate to say "This", but "This!"spectrenihlus said:
Honestly, the first movie was awful - I'm surprised it even got a sequel.
So, the first film would be like My Little Pony compared to this, huh? It'd be better if it was the other way around. Imagine, people going to cinemas to see this disgusting, horrifying thing, and then being shown all 26 episodes My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. I'd pay to see them.
And top it off with Baman Piderman as well...
And top it off with Baman Piderman as well...
I really cannot believe that they made the sequel to the film about a guy who watches the original. This sounds like the director is masturbating to his own work...
I honestly can't believe anyone thought this should be made, it's completely stupid. That isn't horror. The saw movies were more horror than that.
I honestly can't believe anyone thought this should be made, it's completely stupid. That isn't horror. The saw movies were more horror than that.
Can't really have much of an opinion on the Censorship issue without seeing it, which i certainly won't. It sounds more like a really fucked up porn than an actual film. They haven't banned it so much as put a hurdle into its wide release, and if it does prove to be devoid of any semblance of merit i guess i don't have a huge problem with that.
Its a tricky subject, and a slippery slope. You look at an obviously objectionable title such as this one, but later on something even more ambiguous show's up, who decides what does and doesn't cross the line... dunno something to think about i guess.
Its a tricky subject, and a slippery slope. You look at an obviously objectionable title such as this one, but later on something even more ambiguous show's up, who decides what does and doesn't cross the line... dunno something to think about i guess.
I'm not surprised, the first movie was disgusting an vile.
But, at least the fourth wall has been broken, all be it in a extremely sick manor.
But, at least the fourth wall has been broken, all be it in a extremely sick manor.
To anyone who makes an issue about the banning of this film being a breach of freedom of speech/expression:
A) We don't have freedom of speech in the UK (to my knowledge that only applies in the US).
B) Even if we did have freedom of speech, banning this wouldn't be a violation of that.
Allow me to elaborate on the second point there, freedom of speech is defined as the people's right to express their beliefs and opinions publicly without fear of censorship or punishment.
Creating a film where you express your displeasure with a political system or anything else that affects us on a societal level is a valid use of freedom of speech.
Creating a film about sandpaper masturbation, mass abductions, mutilations and rape for perverse sexual satisfaction (seemingly with the only intent of the film being to shock audiences with explicitly horrific acts of cruelty) isn't expressing your right to freedom of speech, that's just called being fucked up in the head.
With this in mind, I'm suprised anyone approved of this movie at all, who would honestly read the script and say to themselves, 'I want to be a part of this film, I want my name to forever be associated with this movie'?
A) We don't have freedom of speech in the UK (to my knowledge that only applies in the US).
B) Even if we did have freedom of speech, banning this wouldn't be a violation of that.
Allow me to elaborate on the second point there, freedom of speech is defined as the people's right to express their beliefs and opinions publicly without fear of censorship or punishment.
Creating a film where you express your displeasure with a political system or anything else that affects us on a societal level is a valid use of freedom of speech.
Creating a film about sandpaper masturbation, mass abductions, mutilations and rape for perverse sexual satisfaction (seemingly with the only intent of the film being to shock audiences with explicitly horrific acts of cruelty) isn't expressing your right to freedom of speech, that's just called being fucked up in the head.
With this in mind, I'm suprised anyone approved of this movie at all, who would honestly read the script and say to themselves, 'I want to be a part of this film, I want my name to forever be associated with this movie'?
Hey kiddies, bad stuff doesn't magically go away just because you don't want to look at it. It should be up to the individual theater owners whether they want to broadcast the movie, and up the individual theater goer whether or not they want to watch it.
That is called freedom and freedom is something that many people can't handle.
That is called freedom and freedom is something that many people can't handle.
Oh, Tom Six. You self-indulgent... thing.vansau said:
Seriously, that kind of plot takes balls, if nothing else.
That said, I was eating oatmeal while reading this. I need a psychiatrist now.
Oh my god. Look out Australia, we're catching up. First we're having the introductions of fines for swearing, and now movies are being denied classification? What's next, banning violent or offensive material á la Mortal Kombat in Australia?
It's absolutely disgusting that people feel the need to 'protect people from themselves'. No-one is being forced to see the film. I'm a grown man, an adult, and if i choose to see the movie then that's my own choice. I don't tell you what you can and can't do. It doesn't matter how 'offensive' this or any other form of material is, censorship should only be in place to remove illegal material.
It's absolutely disgusting that people feel the need to 'protect people from themselves'. No-one is being forced to see the film. I'm a grown man, an adult, and if i choose to see the movie then that's my own choice. I don't tell you what you can and can't do. It doesn't matter how 'offensive' this or any other form of material is, censorship should only be in place to remove illegal material.
HUMAN BUTTERFLY?nuba km said:
Oh, I can't wait to see how he'll make THAT "100% medically accurate" (something that I can guarantee his first film wasn't).