Human Centipede II Refused U.K. Classification

rembrandtqeinstein

New member
Sep 4, 2009
2,173
0
0
Hey kiddies, bad stuff doesn't magically go away just because you don't want to look at it. It should be up to the individual theater owners whether they want to broadcast the movie, and up the individual theater goer whether or not they want to watch it.

That is called freedom and freedom is something that many people can't handle.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
vansau said:
The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) tells the story of a man who becomes sexually obsessed with a DVD recording of the first film in the series, The Human Centipede, masturbating to the first film, using sandpaper to pleasure himself. He decides to create a "human centipede" of his own, which he uses to his own sexual delight, taking sexual pleasure in watching victims of the centipede defecate in each other's mouths and raping the woman at the end of the centipede.
Oh, Tom Six. You self-indulgent... thing.

Seriously, that kind of plot takes balls, if nothing else.

That said, I was eating oatmeal while reading this. I need a psychiatrist now.
 

Gralian

Me, I'm Counting
Sep 24, 2008
1,789
0
0
Oh my god. Look out Australia, we're catching up. First we're having the introductions of fines for swearing, and now movies are being denied classification? What's next, banning violent or offensive material á la Mortal Kombat in Australia?

It's absolutely disgusting that people feel the need to 'protect people from themselves'. No-one is being forced to see the film. I'm a grown man, an adult, and if i choose to see the movie then that's my own choice. I don't tell you what you can and can't do. It doesn't matter how 'offensive' this or any other form of material is, censorship should only be in place to remove illegal material.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
nuba km said:
New York Patrick said:
Wait... THEY WERE ABLE TO FUND AND PRODUCE A SECOND HUMAN CENTIPIDE!?!?!?

My.. my faith in the human race is completely gone now...
it was planned as a trilogy ending with the human butterfly, according to my friend who has spend a lot of time on sickopedia after finding out about the first human centipede movie.
HUMAN BUTTERFLY?

Oh, I can't wait to see how he'll make THAT "100% medically accurate" (something that I can guarantee his first film wasn't).
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Gralian said:
Oh my god. Look out Australia, we're catching up. First we're having the introductions of fines for swearing, and now movies are being denied classification? What's next, banning violent or offensive material á la Mortal Kombat in Australia?

It's absolutely disgusting that people feel the need to 'protect people from themselves'. No-one is being forced to see the film. I'm a grown man, an adult, and if i choose to see the movie then that's my own choice. I don't tell you what you can and can't do. It doesn't matter how 'offensive' this or any other form of material is, censorship should only be in place to remove illegal material.
They believe that the film can cause actual damage to viewers, which YOU certainly can't agree with or deny (you haven't seen it). If that's the case, then they're perfectly in the right to ban it.

At any rate, this just takes it out of theaters. You can still by it on DVD, thus preserving your precious "right" to mentally attack yourself.
 

Gralian

Me, I'm Counting
Sep 24, 2008
1,789
0
0
lacktheknack said:
They believe that the film can cause actual damage to viewers, which YOU certainly can't agree with or deny (you haven't seen it). If that's the case, then they're perfectly in the right to ban it.

At any rate, this just takes it out of theaters. You can still by it on DVD, thus preserving your precious "right" to mentally attack yourself.
So you're saying i should just accept that statement? THEY certainly can't make that claim. (are they saying they have seen it and were mentally damaged? If they saw it and were not mentally damaged, doesn't that make their entire point moot? Not only that, but you cannot honestly make a blanket statement about how EVERYBODY will react to something)

I didn't know they'd still sell it on DVD. I assumed "refused classification" meant it wouldn't be shown or sold period, since the DVD will still require a classification. And honestly, if you don't consider your own rights to be precious, something is wrong.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
spectrenihlus said:
I think the travesty here is that this film got a sequel.
It was such a shitty film. The entire premise was interestingly reflected in the overall crap that was this film.

Some people just want to watch the whole world watch terrible films.
 

Knusper

New member
Sep 10, 2010
1,235
0
0
I couldn't help but watch it and was honestly sickened. I'm glad they're not releasing it here because now I have an excuse not to see it.

I think I'll watch some MLP now to get it out of my mind right before dinner.
 

RN7

New member
Oct 27, 2009
824
0
0
Part, ok most of me, thinks that the director made this movie only to one-up/trollface the people who bashed his first creation on not being gory or grotesque enough. I really don't think that he made this movie because he felt it needed to be seen. Or at least that what I will tell myself so I can go to sleep at night.
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
What is this...I don't even...

Excuse me, I have to go wash my brain and eyes now...
 

Nerfherder17

New member
May 16, 2011
142
0
0
This is so pathetic, why is it up to these people to tell us what we can and can't watch? Does the government have such little faith in they're own people that they think we're in incapable if thinking for ourselves? Yes the movie sounds gruesome, and there's a chance I won't watch it, but that's my decision to make isn't it?

Edit: although I probably will watch it, my curiosity won't allow me to do otherwise.
 

TobiasFunke

New member
May 17, 2011
124
0
0
I really want to see the human centipede but get freaked out easily and the trailer for it looks very weird!
 
Nov 7, 2009
1,247
0
0
That description actually made me say "ew" out loud and shudder.

...that has not happened in some time.

...oh god, a feeling of morbid curiosity! Kill it! D:

No, really, I watched the first one (in class, may I add) and all I did was giggle. But this sounds...much nastier. Much.
 

eNTi

New member
Sep 8, 2007
46
0
0
omg someone kill that film maker please. i'm having nightmares from that movie and only saw the south park version of it... i think i gotta puke to the pure thought of that 2nd part.
 

trebthegamer

New member
Sep 28, 2009
51
0
0
this sounds so horribly disgusting i'm not even sure they can portray it seriusly. makes me wonder how the filming went.
 

Wolf Hagen

New member
Jul 28, 2010
161
0
0
The first movie made me want to go to the Producer, and get my wasted two hours of Lifetime back so boring was it....

This just sounds like he wants to make a darning dull movie with so much controversy, to see with what he can get away with the Sick F***.

I mean really? Involving rape in a movie that has been kinda gross (to the more sensitive ones) but daaaamn boring.

Goodluck finding some Audience next to the desperate horror viewers and exploitation film critics and maybe people that I dont wanna meet...
 

MrGFunk

New member
Oct 29, 2008
1,350
0
0
This is sad as it's gives the film notoriety I expect it doesn't deserve.

The Human Centipede's director of photography should move on to other projects because it was actually shot really well but on the whole - contrived rubbish.

TobiasFunke said:
I really want to see the human centipede but get freaked out easily and the trailer for it looks very weird!
I'm pretty sure you'll be bored and disgusted.