Human Centipede II Refused U.K. Classification

[Tahmoh]

the thing the op didnt mention is that the raping of the women in the centipede involves barbwire and the other rear hole(check the bbfc description on there site it covers exactly what the sequance involves) so yeah i completly fail to see how the director can claim thats art when even pron companies wouldnt go that far in a sex act(and some have gone pretty damn close), kinda hope this film gets banned or cut to ribbons in most countries if only so it becomes that much harder for people to find torrents once it finally does get a release.

 

[gyroscopeboy]

If its banned in the UK its DEFINITELY not making it to Australia..which i am very glad about...now i won;t have to listen to fuckwits tell me how awesome it is

 

[Cheesebob]

Sounds hilariously vile. I'll just have to get it on DVD when it comes out.

Also for those questioning where they got the money from, I believe the DVD sales for the first one was through the roof.

You'll have to import it, then. No UK classification means it's illegal to sell in the UK, I believe.

Pray to God the Blu Ray is region free then

 

[x-machina]

Really? You people are on board with censorship, beacause you don't like the movie? I'm not trying to defend the Human Centipede, the first movie was terrible. But, I sure as hell am not pleased about any movie being censored.

 

[BoredDragon]

Why the fuck did he have to say My Little Pony!?! I'll never be able to look at Pinkie Pie the same ever again!!!

OT:

The first film had no reason to be made and neither does this one.

edit:

in my opinion

 

[GeekFury]

How disgusting! Such filth should be kept out of movie theatres in the UK!

Now if you will excuse me, I'm going to be tied up by my girlfriend and flogged with a riding crop while we watch Caligula: The Imperial Edition.

 

[ABLb0y]

Wait... He whacks off with sandpaper? dude...

 

[A Raging Emo]

I think the travesty here is that this film got a sequel.

Hate to say "This", but "This!"

Honestly, the first movie was awful - I'm surprised it even got a sequel.

 

[Megacherv]

So, the first film would be like My Little Pony compared to this, huh? It'd be better if it was the other way around. Imagine, people going to cinemas to see this disgusting, horrifying thing, and then being shown all 26 episodes My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. I'd pay to see them.

And top it off with Baman Piderman as well...

 

[FallenTraveler]

I really cannot believe that they made the sequel to the film about a guy who watches the original. This sounds like the director is masturbating to his own work...

I honestly can't believe anyone thought this should be made, it's completely stupid. That isn't horror. The saw movies were more horror than that.

 

[DarkRyter]

I have a feeling they didn't want to rate it because they didn't want to watch it.

Entirely understandable. They're human beings.

 

[nuba km]

Wait... THEY WERE ABLE TO FUND AND PRODUCE A SECOND HUMAN CENTIPIDE!?!?!?

My.. my faith in the human race is completely gone now...

it was planned as a trilogy ending with the human butterfly, according to my friend who has spend a lot of time on sickopedia after finding out about the first human centipede movie.

 

[walrusaurus]

Can't really have much of an opinion on the Censorship issue without seeing it, which i certainly won't. It sounds more like a really fucked up porn than an actual film. They haven't banned it so much as put a hurdle into its wide release, and if it does prove to be devoid of any semblance of merit i guess i don't have a huge problem with that.

Its a tricky subject, and a slippery slope. You look at an obviously objectionable title such as this one, but later on something even more ambiguous show's up, who decides what does and doesn't cross the line... dunno something to think about i guess.

 

[TerribleAssassin]

I'm not surprised, the first movie was disgusting an vile.


But, at least the fourth wall has been broken, all be it in a extremely sick manor.

 

[Iron Mal]

To anyone who makes an issue about the banning of this film being a breach of freedom of speech/expression:

A) We don't have freedom of speech in the UK (to my knowledge that only applies in the US).

B) Even if we did have freedom of speech, banning this wouldn't be a violation of that.

Allow me to elaborate on the second point there, freedom of speech is defined as the people's right to express their beliefs and opinions publicly without fear of censorship or punishment.

Creating a film where you express your displeasure with a political system or anything else that affects us on a societal level is a valid use of freedom of speech.

Creating a film about sandpaper masturbation, mass abductions, mutilations and rape for perverse sexual satisfaction (seemingly with the only intent of the film being to shock audiences with explicitly horrific acts of cruelty) isn't expressing your right to freedom of speech, that's just called being fucked up in the head.

With this in mind, I'm suprised anyone approved of this movie at all, who would honestly read the script and say to themselves, 'I want to be a part of this film, I want my name to forever be associated with this movie'?