check your math, kid. your philosophy up there boils down to this: in order to make the numbers match up (men must have ALL the sex, females must have none!), we need to create a society of exclusively homosexual male couples. i admire the spirit of progressiveness and acceptance you're furthering, but girls have needs too. and we can (and absolutely should) satisfy those with no stigma attached. so, i can make keys to my house for a new resident or two, to borrow your metaphor, so long as it doesn't get too crowded for me personally. if my neighbor doesn't like it, he doesn't need a key and can do whatever he wants.srm79 said:It makes perfect sense. Think about this way: if you have a key that can open lots of different locks, you would have to say that's a pretty damn awesome key, right? But if you have a lock that can be opened by lots of different keys, well, that's a pretty shitty lock. Amirite?
OP: male virgins used to just be an oddity to me. attractive guys can get pretty much any girls they want, i thought, so the ones who don't get sex either are unattractive or think they are. but then i foun out one of my most attractive male friends is still a virgin and is saving himself for marriage, so i reevaluated. male virgins and female virgins are the same as more sexually experienced males and females: they can both do whatever the hell they want with their bodies and nobody should care. but my original point of view probably has a lot to do with virgin shaming.