If you could nuke a country?
- Thread starter MrBaguette
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I can't nuke Palestine because it's not even a real country. (there, I said it - come at me, bros)
Just nuke? That's ridiculous. I would definitely nuke the US because I could get away with it, but not destroy it. Then just invade the country.
Partially because I am jealous of the second amendment and I would defy the populace with a defeated army to surrender their weapons. "Oh, so you want to give me an excuse to shoot civilians and not be accused of war crimes? What do your puny little bullets do against my tanks? You should have also learned how to make explosives!"
I'd be doing a favor to those "preppers"and "SHTF" fanatics.
Seriously. What did rednecks do to you? They are probably the last kind of people to give you any trouble.
Just leave them alone because they leave us alone too.
Just nuke? That's ridiculous. I would definitely nuke the US because I could get away with it, but not destroy it. Then just invade the country.
Partially because I am jealous of the second amendment and I would defy the populace with a defeated army to surrender their weapons. "Oh, so you want to give me an excuse to shoot civilians and not be accused of war crimes? What do your puny little bullets do against my tanks? You should have also learned how to make explosives!"
I'd be doing a favor to those "preppers"and "SHTF" fanatics.
That is just hateful as saying "all n-words need to die".Jazoni89 said:
Seriously. What did rednecks do to you? They are probably the last kind of people to give you any trouble.
Just leave them alone because they leave us alone too.
Somalia... That shit aint savable no more...!
Although to be honest, i'd rather just eliminate Al-Shabab, in a Mars Attacks style, leaving no trace... That would be better than polluting the air in a region that has enough problems!
Although to be honest, i'd rather just eliminate Al-Shabab, in a Mars Attacks style, leaving no trace... That would be better than polluting the air in a region that has enough problems!
Nothing to me personally, but all I know about them is most US citizens hate them. It's kinda like gypsies here in the UK, and they are scorn like hell, evident of the thread I made on here a while back.ElPatron said:
Please take what I say with a fistful of salt though, I mean no offence or death on to anyone, the thread needs a answer, and so I answered. It's just a bit of fun, just with some added black humour, and satire courtesy of me. Obviously not all of it goes down well though, as you point out.
I don't really care which country I destroy. I just want a worldwide broadcast of me saying, "Dammit, I missed!" afterward.
If I can't pick either of those 2, I'd evacuate them, as well as the near by countries, and bomb an adjacent one. Let the fallout make that whole area uninhabitable. No land, no fight over land. As a bonus, with the elimination of a large portion of the world's oil supply, maybe we could finally get some sustainable electric options.
Almost shat myself at the first sentence; I was all like "JESUS!"SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
I guess Sudan or North Korea if I HAD to choose.
They don't hate them. Specially when you can say that at least 1 third of America is composed by rednecks.Jazoni89 said:
They are not a different race, they are not a different culture (although you can label things as "redneck", but that's just like Metal genres - it's still Metal, like it or not).
"Gypsy" is to many a synonym of people that by following their culture don't abide by social norms. Rednecks abide the law, social norms, and don't commit crimes.
This guy is a redneck.
And yet he looks a lot like me. I don't act that differently from him. Damn, I even use the same style of clothes.
Americans don't hate rednecks.
It's for anything really. For whenever the interviewers want to toss you a curve ball. Other hypothetical (and ridiculous question) include but are not limited to "If you had to be a colour, which one would you be and why?"[footnote]Not race related but an actual colour[/footnote], "What animal do you want to be?", "If you know you could see in the future would you do it or not and why?"[footnote]Usually it's doing some kind of action, say "by drinking this glass of water".[/footnote], "What is your favourite type of cookie?"[footnote]OK, not really hypothetical but nothing to do with the job.[/footnote], "If you could save a loved one by [insert significant hindrance here] would you do it?" or "If you knew the world will end tomorrow, what would you do?". Alternatively, they may straight toss you a paradox "If an unstoppable force hits an immovable object, what would happen?"[footnote]The correct answer is: "The existence of "unstoppable force" denies the existence of an "immovable object" and vice-versa. You can have only one of the two, hence the question is wrong."[/footnote]Sonic Doctor said:
This is a bad thread.
You're either asking people to jokingly and arbitrarily name a country without having good reasons (in which case the responses are meaningless), or you're asking them to be serious and have good reasons and prove they're a complete fucking lunatic.
You might as well have asked, "Which ethnic group would you like to cleanse?"
You're either asking people to jokingly and arbitrarily name a country without having good reasons (in which case the responses are meaningless), or you're asking them to be serious and have good reasons and prove they're a complete fucking lunatic.
You might as well have asked, "Which ethnic group would you like to cleanse?"
well if for some inane reason I absolutely had to use a nuke, like the world will be destroyed or some crap (even then I'd hesitate, I hate nukes) I would nuke america, they nuked Japan, I only feel it fair that they get a taste of the destruction they wrought, with what? a single megaton, no, about two, they dropped two nukes didn't they, anyways, it's an ungodly amount of destruction I wouldn't wish upon anyone in normal circumstances, and most abnormal circumstances
I'd establish a small 'country' somewhere on the surface of Luna. And then I'd nuke it.
For science.
Because I'd like to see what would happen if you shot a nuke at our moon. It'd likely just give the topography a slight makeover and leave a bit of radiation lying about, but you've got to admit: it'd be a fantastic spectacle.
For science.
Because I'd like to see what would happen if you shot a nuke at our moon. It'd likely just give the topography a slight makeover and leave a bit of radiation lying about, but you've got to admit: it'd be a fantastic spectacle.