Agreed. +1 like for MSPA reference.aeroz said:Well all I know is, if I win, it will be dance time
*snip*
I totally understand the width limit, and that's strictly due to web design purposes. 650 px is the size of their main content area, so having any images bigger than that would screw up the look of the site or just not show up at all. The width of websites is typically static. As for the height limit... I'm assuming that's because once your comic is over twice as long as it is wide that you probably need to get to the punchline already. Also, just basic bandwidth considerations, although that probably wouldn't matter as much considering all the videos they already host.aeroz said:one thing I didn't like about this contest was the strict limits on dimensions. I mean just about everything thats been posted here, atleast from my understanding of the rules, wouldn't qualify for the contest.
Now how exactly would von Trier, former advocate of dogme '95, be a more appropriate choice than 20th century existential genius Ingmar Bergman?Fuzzy_Pickles said:Everybody loves ol' soap drama...
its not that I do not understand the size. And I am clearly able to work within the limitations and find them acceptable otherwise i wouldn't have entered.isjusterin said:I totally understand the width limit, and that's strictly due to web design purposes. 650 px is the size of their main content area, so having any images bigger than that would screw up the look of the site or just not show up at all. The width of websites is typically static. As for the height limit... I'm assuming that's because once your comic is over twice as long as it is wide that you probably need to get to the punchline already. Also, just basic bandwidth considerations, although that probably wouldn't matter as much considering all the videos they already host.aeroz said:one thing I didn't like about this contest was the strict limits on dimensions. I mean just about everything thats been posted here, atleast from my understanding of the rules, wouldn't qualify for the contest.
I respect your opinion, though I personally find appreciation for Ingmar Bergman very bourgeois. Lars von Trier is a freakin' lunatic and thus the byproduct is richly orgasmic movies.LiquidGrape said:Now how exactly would von Trier, former advocate of dogme '95, be a more appropriate choice than 20th century existential genius Ingmar Bergman?Fuzzy_Pickles said:Everybody loves ol' soap drama...
HERESY!
P.S
Nice work though.
D.S
I don't understand. Drama? What drama? Are you sure you're in the right place?LiquidGrape said:
Oh yeah? Well, so's your mom. And this whole thread looks shopped. I can tell from the pixels and from having seen quite a few shops in my time.Steagony said:Because let me tell you boy, this ain't no internet drama I'm acquainted with. No, my drama is a troll-laden hellscape sown with a generous number of sulking replies and personal attacks, none of which are present at this current juncture.
FINE. We are no longer friends.boybokeh said:Oh yeah? Well, so's your mom. And this whole thread looks shopped. I can tell from the pixels and from having seen quite a few shops in my time.