Infinity Ward Not Making Modern Warfare 3

ProfessorLayton

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,452
0
41
Finally. Call of Duty has had the crap milked out of it, and I'm glad to hear that they're going to do something new. They have some talent, and I'd like to see it get put towards something new and creative.

Ben Legend said:
Woah... we need at least one more to finish of the trilogy!!!
The trilogy? So the 4th sequel of a game needs a trilogy? The numbering is screwier than Resident Evil.
 

NoDamnNames

New member
Feb 25, 2009
374
0
0
I highly doubt it unless they have come To hate money. but hey new quality franchises would be nice to see to.

maybe they will put some actual "Modern" guns in the next "modern warfare" rather than tacking on heartbeat sensors to guns from the previous century. While the ranger, 1887, AK47, and Revolver are all cool, they are...well...not modern...The 1887 was made in the year 1887...


A land warrior perk over a constant UAV HUD would have been more suitable to...
 

yourbeliefs

Bored at Work
Jan 30, 2009
781
0
0
CantFaketheFunk said:
Anything else would seem like a comedown from the gargantuan MW2 - how do you follow up an act like that?
I disagree. They have no where to go but up as far as the single player experience goes.
 

sylekage

New member
Dec 24, 2008
710
0
0
Well, if they don't finish it I'm done with their games. They can't just leave a game like that on such a cliff hanger. And it's the most badass series ever made.
 

The Great JT

New member
Oct 6, 2008
3,721
0
0
Infinity Ward, let me plug this idea into your heads:

Call of Duty: World War I.

I mean, we all pretty much disregard WWI and go straight to WWII, so why not step back and look at the first World War.
 

Cherry Cola

Your daddy, your Rock'n'Rolla
Jun 26, 2009
11,940
0
0
Puddle Jumper said:
HUBILUB said:
Oh god, don't let Treyarch do it.

Not after what they did to Spiderman!
You mean Spider-man 2: THe movie, the game and Ultimate Spider-man? Yes, how dare they. (not all of their spidey games suck)
Spiderman 3 out-sucked all of them.

As did the Force Unleashed! [sub]Ha! Low-blow against your avatar![/sub]
 

ninjapenguin981

New member
Jul 10, 2009
380
0
0
The Great JT said:
Infinity Ward, let me plug this idea into your heads:

Call of Duty: World War I.

I mean, we all pretty much disregard WWI and go straight to WWII, so why not step back and look at the first World War.
Because WWI would be...

Walk across no-mans land. Get shot.
Play as another character.
Repeat.

And yes that's what they did, walk. Walk into German machine gun fire.
 

Coaxill

New member
Dec 22, 2009
100
0
0
Oh my god... if treyarch gets COD production, they will make the games no longer interconnect, add more strange gibbing and give you a gun at the start of the multiplayer that gets an underbarrel minigun when you get 2 kills with it.
 

Coaxill

New member
Dec 22, 2009
100
0
0
NoDamnNames said:
I highly doubt it unless they have come To hate money. but hey new quality franchises would be nice to see to.

maybe they will put some actual "Modern" guns in the next "modern warfare" rather than tacking on heartbeat sensors to guns from the previous century. While the ranger, 1887, AK47, and Revolver are all cool, they are...well...not modern...The 1887 was made in the year 1887...


A land warier perk over a constant UAV HUD would have been more suitable to...
Why shouldn't we have some old guns in there? People will be using sawed off shotguns for years upon years to come and both the rangers and 1887s are publicly available. (you have to do the sawing for yourself) As for revolvers, why not? They fire a large caliber round at high velocity. In game, it's allot more useful than the desert eagle, a much more "Modern" gun.
 

v3n0mat3

New member
Jul 30, 2008
938
0
0
Future warfare! Do it! DO IT NOOOOOOOWWWWW!!!

No, seriously. They should work on a future warfare franchise. No need to go back to WWII.
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,508
0
0
CNKFan said:
Sir Ollie said:
I've said this once, I've said this twice..please for the love of God make Medieval warfare!
Yes because A: There will still be Captian Price, and B: He will been in plate armor. That is awesome.
Nay - Sir Pricealot, royal knight of Arthur.
 

Honkymagoo

New member
Oct 28, 2009
28
0
0
Good. IW absolutely shit the bed with MW2 and I'm not supporting their future efforts (I'll consider a rental to see at least.)

Bad Company 2 looks to blow shitty MW2 out of the water anyway.
 

knuckles2812

New member
Jun 6, 2009
30
0
0
ya know... I think a medieval warfare would be a fun game to play, but I think that game is something that should stand on it's own... I wouldn't put the call of duty moniker on that
 

Et3rnalLegend64

New member
Jan 9, 2009
2,448
0
0
So now that they're supposedly not making a sequel, people want it. If they did make a sequel, I'd be willing to be people would complain that they're milking a successful franchise. And does anyone remember the guys holding modernwarfare4.com for ransom? Haha.