Internet Petition Demands Dark Souls Drop GFWL

Recommended Videos

piplink

New member
Mar 11, 2011
135
0
0
GFWL is what made me not be able to play GTA4, i wanted to, but GFWL just would'nt let me.

this is a steam or no sale for me.
 

80Maxwell08

New member
Jul 14, 2010
1,102
0
0
idarkphoenixi said:
What exactly is the problem with GFWL?

Saying "I hate it because it sucks" really doesn't help.
Read right above your post. There's also some connection issues games that have used it had.
 

Mr Pantomime

New member
Jul 10, 2010
1,647
0
0
I do have to wonder who thinks "we need a DRM service for our PC game" and then thinks "Games for Windows Live". It just seems illogical.

Edit: Oh, just remembered, Microsoft likes to buy things from Namco Bandai. Thats probably why.
[link]http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/111156-Microsoft-Bought-Tales-of-Vesperias-360-Exclusivity[/link]

Looks like were fucked. Cracked .exes and custom servers it is then.
 

weirdee

Swamp Weather Balloon Gas
Apr 11, 2011
2,634
0
0
Well, let's put it this way: say you've been wanting to have a baby for some time, and adoption isn't really an option for you. Then, say, a witch graciously offers you the solution, in exchange for your soul when you die. You agree.

Hours after the birth, the baby sneaks out of its room and stabs you in your sleep.

Swearing at your computer monitor and muttering about how the online guide didn't mention that part, you hit the reload button, but then it turns out GFWL corrupted your save files.

DO YOU REALLY WANT THIS TO HAPPEN?
 

Zakarath

New member
Mar 23, 2009
1,244
0
0
Yep, I've had issues with GFWL.
I've had a little interest in the game, but if they stick with GFWL, that interest will evaporate. GFWL is a dealbreaker on ANY game for me, I don't care how good.
 

qeinar

New member
Jul 14, 2009
562
0
0
Colonel Joson said:
*raises hand sheepishly* Uh hello everyone! I've used GFWL since I bought Dawn of War 2 and so far I haven't had any problems with it. If I may ask, what exactly is wrong with GFWL?
A lot of people have had or are having problems with gfwl (including me). Have you tryed steam then? even when gfwl works it's worse than steam.
 

Bostur

New member
Mar 14, 2011
1,070
0
0
Valdus said:
Careful guys, if you keep this up people might start to think PC gamers are spoiled and entitled or something.

You got your freakin' port and you're getting bonus bosses as well. Quit crying for half a sec and try actually enjoying what you got.

I'm tempted to start a petition to From Software called the "Ignore the PC gamers" petition, because if they spend all their time catering for the PC crowd I'll probably never see a new Souls game since they'll never be satisfied. What's more annoying is that if I claim to be a PC gamer when I do I'll probably get tons of support for the petition.
What good is a port that won't run? Because that is the situation some PC users find themselves in when they realize a game they bought use GFWL. And there's rarely any help to get from MS.

There are plenty of other bugs and quirks associated with GFWL, for instance that server reliability and uptime is poor in some countries.
 

SovietX

New member
Sep 8, 2009
438
0
0
I feel like the only person who doesn't have a problem with GFWL. I've used it many times before and while it can make things a little difficult to get the ball rolling was you learn its foibles it generally works alright. While I would much rather get the game on steam (steam community and ingame) I don't really mind either way.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,976
0
0
Reminds me of the start of this TB video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etynVIN_6t4&feature=plcp&context=C4cdafa1VDvjVQa1PpcFPmU4rYsxQ0vcD3ih0jyrjxfaJ8AIqrqhE%3D
 

SargentToughie

New member
Jun 14, 2008
2,580
0
0
soulfire130 said:
-_- Did it realy need to jump right to the petition? Couldn't you guys use less annoying means like emailing them your complaints?
So bombarding the dev's inbox with emails is less annoying then a bunch of people signing one mass letter?
 

Adultratedhydra

New member
Aug 19, 2010
177
0
0
Ah GFWL. What a piece of crap. Ruined Section 8: Prejudice. Cannot complete a single game, GFWL always decides that i dont need to complete the match and DC's me.
 

soulfire130

New member
Jun 15, 2010
189
0
0
SargentToughie said:
soulfire130 said:
-_- Did it realy need to jump right to the petition? Couldn't you guys use less annoying means like emailing them your complaints?
So bombarding the dev's inbox with emails is less annoying then a bunch of people signing one mass letter?


I'll be honest and say it was hard trying to find a example (which I apparently failed at doing). What I was trying to get at was there has to be another way of letting the devs know about the consumers disapproval other than having a petition say "Change this NOW!" That's all I'm saying.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
I am still looking forward to this game on the PC, which by all accounts should be a much better version than either console version. I don't want GFWL, I hate it. But I will suffer it to play this game on my PC. As soon as I heard that it will be getting a definite PC release, I shelved my PS3 version.

I don't think people understand the concept of baby steps. We want them to feel that the PC is a worthwhile platform and that means helping them along and not offering ultimatums like, "Steam or No Sale". That is just stupid. I have mostly not had any problems with GFWL with a few exceptions, so I'm hoping this gets by without issues. When push comes to shove, it's not always fun to be invaded, and I never bother invading anyone. The only time I get help on the game is when I really am having trouble with a boss.

I'm not out to alienate them so we don't get future games from them. They do have another Souls game in the works and I would love for them to have a PC version out of the gate. Truth be told, if GFWL is a problem they will hear about it from customers. Worst case scenario, you just play solo. Which contrary to popular belief, doesn't change the game experience all that much. It's not really an integral part of the game as much as it is a cool feature.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Alma Mare said:
Hope the port fails to profit. Teach them idiots a lesson.
That'll teach them alright. They just won't bother putting anymore games on the PC again, haha.
 

Andy of Comix Inc

New member
Apr 2, 2010
2,234
0
0
I love Steam, but "no Steam or no sale" applies to say many games no it's not funny, and Steam's monopoly is not a good thing for the industry. I for one am more disappointed than angry in Origin, for example; what could have been genuine competition for Steam from a big name in the industry is instead an intrusive and much maligned piece of trash. Same with GFWL - both show potential, and both are held back by wildly illogical design decisions.

I'd rather every game was either sold without DRM, or sold on a wide variety of platforms. "Steam or bust" just reeks of pettiness, but it's also a dangerous sort of petty; the kind that sees a lot of games from a lot of developers sweeped under the carpet because they aren't selling on Steam. It's stupid, and it gives Steam a hand up that it hasn't earned.
 

SargentToughie

New member
Jun 14, 2008
2,580
0
0
soulfire130 said:
I'll be honest and say it was hard trying to find a example (which I apparently failed at doing). What I was trying to get at was there has to be another way of letting the devs know about the consumers disapproval other than having a petition say "Change this NOW!" That's all I'm saying.
Actually, I can't think of anything more civilized then a petition. And it's not so much a case of them saying "Change this NOW" as much as it is them saying "Change this or we won't buy your game".

Would you rather them just pull a Retake Mass Effect and sent Namco 400 cupcakes, except all the icing was replaced with poo? It's a perfectly good cupcake underneath, and Namco might have wanted this brand of cupcake for a long, LONG time, but the poo on top totally ruins it as a whole.

... I wonder where exactly in my train of thought my pointing at Retake Mass Effect turned into an analogy for GFWL... I swear it wasn't intentional when I started typing this post.
 

soulfire130

New member
Jun 15, 2010
189
0
0
SargentToughie said:
soulfire130 said:
I'll be honest and say it was hard trying to find a example (which I apparently failed at doing). What I was trying to get at was there has to be another way of letting the devs know about the consumers disapproval other than having a petition say "Change this NOW!" That's all I'm saying.
Actually, I can't think of anything more civilized then a petition. And it's not so much a case of them saying "Change this NOW" as much as it is them saying "Change this or we won't buy your game".

Would you rather them just pull a Retake Mass Effect and sent Namco 400 cupcakes, except all the icing was replaced with poo? It's a perfectly good cupcake underneath, and Namco might have wanted this brand of cupcake for a long, LONG time, but the poo on top totally ruins it as a whole.

... I wonder where exactly in my train of thought my pointing at Retake Mass Effect turned into an analogy for GFWL... I swear it wasn't intentional when I started typing this post.

I understand. Its just that it feels like people will form a petition over everything.

Also, the Retake Mass Effect thing is still on everyone minds right now so it undertandable to have used it as an analogy.
 

Roboto

New member
Nov 18, 2009
332
0
0
AnarchistAbe said:
Roboto said:
Thing is, the older you get and the more indentured you become in the business, the more you find out EVERYTHING in the entire games and systems industry boils down to the all powerful cost benefits analysis. There wasn't going to be a port, someone initially crunched the numbers and said "no way, waste." Then 93,000 sigs popped into existence, and even taking away 20,000 of those as bandwagon and another 10,000 for piracy buffer of those sigs gives you 63,000 buys. It's not absolute math as it is speculative and I have no way to back up those numbers, but neither do they, and sometimes speculation is the only way we can get results. Anyway, 63,000 x profit margin = TotalProfitFromPort. TotalProfitFromPort > CostOfPort = PortGetsMade. The initial value to the crunchers had totalprofitfromport much lower I assume, which is why it doesn't get made. Same reason Halo 3 never got a PC edition. What this newest petition does is subtract from TotalProfitFromPort. My last post encompasses that variable.

Either way, you may have heard "decide with your wallet" which can be frustrating to hear because you may like the property but there is a part of it you hate and do not want to support. Not buying it to teach them a lesson means not getting the part you want, and the potential to cause a misunderstanding that the part you wanted WAS the bad part that made you not buy it. Oops. That is what stops the sequel from being made. What these guys did is do a Commander Shepard: they took a third option. Tell the company that a lot of us do not like a specific part of the product, but that we love all the rest of it (seems obvious). Now here is the exact number of us who do not like that specific part.

It is all a numbers game. They have samples and numbers of their own, we're just providing them with our own numbers to help them exact things out. It has always been a numbers game and always will be. You know this for yourself though as you do seem smart. We're just so used to seeing all those numbers from one side (devs) and it is interesting that it is all swinging the other way; seeing numbers coming from the gamer side and actually impacting things is unusual and so I would qualify that as news, or even a trend.
I agree with a large majority of this. I'm just saying. It'd be like me not having enough cookies, and you not having one. I go bake you a special cookie that takes up a lot of my time and effort. Then, you decide that I didn't use the right chocolate chips in my cookie, and you throw it in my face. Isn't that a bit of a dick move?
In your scenario yes, dick move. Now if we exacerbate on it a bit, and me and my 97,000 friends were waving money in front of you to make us that special cookie. You relent and make that cookie, and while making it, you accidentally and not to your knowledge grab the cayenne pepper, the lid falls off while you're not watching, and bake it up. Now, don't get me wrong, a few people may like this different taste. But the vast majority are going to get burned. Same principle as not everything free is good: if someone leaves a bag of dog shit on your porch, that's free but undesirable. Since money is involved, we can't really use kindness of our hearts as arguments, which kind of kills what I just mentioned.

Maybe it wasn't even an accident. Maybe you thought I like cayenne pepper in cookies. What the petition is showing is that no, we do not like that flavor. Not in my cookies.