Read right above your post. There's also some connection issues games that have used it had.idarkphoenixi said:What exactly is the problem with GFWL?
Saying "I hate it because it sucks" really doesn't help.
A lot of people have had or are having problems with gfwl (including me). Have you tryed steam then? even when gfwl works it's worse than steam.Colonel Joson said:*raises hand sheepishly* Uh hello everyone! I've used GFWL since I bought Dawn of War 2 and so far I haven't had any problems with it. If I may ask, what exactly is wrong with GFWL?
What good is a port that won't run? Because that is the situation some PC users find themselves in when they realize a game they bought use GFWL. And there's rarely any help to get from MS.Valdus said:Careful guys, if you keep this up people might start to think PC gamers are spoiled and entitled or something.
You got your freakin' port and you're getting bonus bosses as well. Quit crying for half a sec and try actually enjoying what you got.
I'm tempted to start a petition to From Software called the "Ignore the PC gamers" petition, because if they spend all their time catering for the PC crowd I'll probably never see a new Souls game since they'll never be satisfied. What's more annoying is that if I claim to be a PC gamer when I do I'll probably get tons of support for the petition.
So bombarding the dev's inbox with emails is less annoying then a bunch of people signing one mass letter?soulfire130 said:-_- Did it realy need to jump right to the petition? Couldn't you guys use less annoying means like emailing them your complaints?
SargentToughie said:So bombarding the dev's inbox with emails is less annoying then a bunch of people signing one mass letter?soulfire130 said:-_- Did it realy need to jump right to the petition? Couldn't you guys use less annoying means like emailing them your complaints?
That'll teach them alright. They just won't bother putting anymore games on the PC again, haha.Alma Mare said:Hope the port fails to profit. Teach them idiots a lesson.
Actually, I can't think of anything more civilized then a petition. And it's not so much a case of them saying "Change this NOW" as much as it is them saying "Change this or we won't buy your game".soulfire130 said:I'll be honest and say it was hard trying to find a example (which I apparently failed at doing). What I was trying to get at was there has to be another way of letting the devs know about the consumers disapproval other than having a petition say "Change this NOW!" That's all I'm saying.
SargentToughie said:Actually, I can't think of anything more civilized then a petition. And it's not so much a case of them saying "Change this NOW" as much as it is them saying "Change this or we won't buy your game".soulfire130 said:I'll be honest and say it was hard trying to find a example (which I apparently failed at doing). What I was trying to get at was there has to be another way of letting the devs know about the consumers disapproval other than having a petition say "Change this NOW!" That's all I'm saying.
Would you rather them just pull a Retake Mass Effect and sent Namco 400 cupcakes, except all the icing was replaced with poo? It's a perfectly good cupcake underneath, and Namco might have wanted this brand of cupcake for a long, LONG time, but the poo on top totally ruins it as a whole.
... I wonder where exactly in my train of thought my pointing at Retake Mass Effect turned into an analogy for GFWL... I swear it wasn't intentional when I started typing this post.
In your scenario yes, dick move. Now if we exacerbate on it a bit, and me and my 97,000 friends were waving money in front of you to make us that special cookie. You relent and make that cookie, and while making it, you accidentally and not to your knowledge grab the cayenne pepper, the lid falls off while you're not watching, and bake it up. Now, don't get me wrong, a few people may like this different taste. But the vast majority are going to get burned. Same principle as not everything free is good: if someone leaves a bag of dog shit on your porch, that's free but undesirable. Since money is involved, we can't really use kindness of our hearts as arguments, which kind of kills what I just mentioned.AnarchistAbe said:I agree with a large majority of this. I'm just saying. It'd be like me not having enough cookies, and you not having one. I go bake you a special cookie that takes up a lot of my time and effort. Then, you decide that I didn't use the right chocolate chips in my cookie, and you throw it in my face. Isn't that a bit of a dick move?Roboto said:Thing is, the older you get and the more indentured you become in the business, the more you find out EVERYTHING in the entire games and systems industry boils down to the all powerful cost benefits analysis. There wasn't going to be a port, someone initially crunched the numbers and said "no way, waste." Then 93,000 sigs popped into existence, and even taking away 20,000 of those as bandwagon and another 10,000 for piracy buffer of those sigs gives you 63,000 buys. It's not absolute math as it is speculative and I have no way to back up those numbers, but neither do they, and sometimes speculation is the only way we can get results. Anyway, 63,000 x profit margin = TotalProfitFromPort. TotalProfitFromPort > CostOfPort = PortGetsMade. The initial value to the crunchers had totalprofitfromport much lower I assume, which is why it doesn't get made. Same reason Halo 3 never got a PC edition. What this newest petition does is subtract from TotalProfitFromPort. My last post encompasses that variable.
Either way, you may have heard "decide with your wallet" which can be frustrating to hear because you may like the property but there is a part of it you hate and do not want to support. Not buying it to teach them a lesson means not getting the part you want, and the potential to cause a misunderstanding that the part you wanted WAS the bad part that made you not buy it. Oops. That is what stops the sequel from being made. What these guys did is do a Commander Shepard: they took a third option. Tell the company that a lot of us do not like a specific part of the product, but that we love all the rest of it (seems obvious). Now here is the exact number of us who do not like that specific part.
It is all a numbers game. They have samples and numbers of their own, we're just providing them with our own numbers to help them exact things out. It has always been a numbers game and always will be. You know this for yourself though as you do seem smart. We're just so used to seeing all those numbers from one side (devs) and it is interesting that it is all swinging the other way; seeing numbers coming from the gamer side and actually impacting things is unusual and so I would qualify that as news, or even a trend.