It Never Ends

[Amaror]

Oh god, my eyes!
These characters just look so ... weird. Their bodys don't look really stylised, but rather deformed. And the motions of those breasts in the video. ugh..
Don't get me wrong, i like big boobs, even virtual ones, but this character, or rather all the characters in that game don't look alluring to me, but rather repulsive.

 

[snowfi6916]

I'm just curious...

Does this mean there should never be an oversexualized woman in a game ever? That there is absolutely no room for designs like these?

If so, that would make all the angry peeps far more intelorant than what we've seen from the game industry.

How about we save all the rage for things that matters, eh?

The better question is, why do they need to be oversexualized at all? Why do they need to have a figure that has such a small waist that it couldn't possibly hold up her upper body? Why does she need to have boobs that make it look like if she leans too far forward, she will fall over?

Again, there are mediums where you can have that. Go to a porn site. There is plenty of that.

One of the reasons no one takes video games seriously as a medium, and why they are blamed for everything in our society, is because they are seen as immature and juvenile. Having monster boobs on women doesn't help us in that regard. It hurts us.

 

[TTYTYTTYYTTYTTTY]

Trying to keep this short and to the point:

The problem isn't the Sorceress' design. The problem isn't that she exists or that characters like her exist. The problem isn't even that female characters are portrayed as sexually appealing. The problem is the pervasive trend which this character design is an example of, which is to treat women as ONLY sex objects.

There would not be any problem with characters like this at all (not even as part of a trend) if they were only ever enjoyed as silly little indulgences on the side, with the full understanding of what it was you were indulging in.

The problem is that we're not at that level of maturity yet.

Only if "we" are the blockbuster and porn audiences.

Here's an analogy to film: when you want to watch an intelligent production, when you don't want sexual content and you want a piece devoid of stereotypes and old rolemodels, you obviously won't download a porn, but you also won't find what you're looking for in the vast majority of hollywood blockbuster movies.

Triple-A games are the blockbusters of gaming. The publishers cater to young men and their business model revolves around getting as many as possible to part with 60 bucks in the first weeks post release. This locks most of these titles in that simple formula of action plus titilation. AAA is the wrong place to look for maturity.

More cerebral genres like turn-based strategy, puzzle platforming and puzzle adventure are a much better places to look for mature games.
Generally such games are more intelligent and the audiences are more likely to be sympathetic to the issue here. They don't need that shit to enjoy the gameplay.
If action is your main thing, then you'll be mostly resigned to indie games, where the focus is more on gameplay.

Game feminism ignores all the low hanging fruit and that makes it such a terribly lost cause.
You cannot fix japanese fetish fueled games and western triple-A titles in the same way cannot fix pornos and blockbusters. Such games and recordings exist because there are very big, paying audiences in the market for it and as such they will always be catered to with many products. You CANNOT FIGHT this.

What people can do, is SUPPORT such games that they think are mature. The only sacrifice for some will be getting used to more basic graphics and that is all there is to it.

I agree, yet feminists will find issue with anything that doesn't conform to there ideal, while failing to realize that many other genres exist and that they can make/support "good" games.

 

[TTYTYTTYYTTYTTTY]

I'm just curious...

Does this mean there should never be an oversexualized woman in a game ever? That there is absolutely no room for designs like these?

If so, that would make all the angry peeps far more intelorant than what we've seen from the game industry.

How about we save all the rage for things that matters, eh?

The better question is, why do they need to be oversexualized at all? Why do they need to have a figure that has such a small waist that it couldn't possibly hold up her upper body? Why does she need to have boobs that make it look like if she leans too far forward, she will fall over?

Again, there are mediums where you can have that. Go to a porn site. There is plenty of that.

One of the reasons no one takes video games seriously as a medium, and why they are blamed for everything in our society, is because they are seen as immature and juvenile. Having monster boobs on women doesn't help us in that regard. It hurts us.

The only people not taking the video game industry seriously are non-gamers and gamers. Developers, companies and investors are taking the industry quite seriously as there jobs and financial well-beings are on the line.

 

[AgentShiver]

All I can think of when I see pictures of characters like this is how much their backs/spines are suffering. Living with boobs gives a whole different perspective on them than just looking at them. Do I get annoyed when I see female characters like this in video games? No. Do I get annoyed when I see /the vast majority/ of female characters like this in video games? Yeah. These games aren't geared towards me though. I roll my eyes and move on, looking for the next Professor Layton game.

I don't mind a large chest. Heck, the latest rendition Lara Croft is highly attractive and has a large chest. But attention isn't drawn to it as a selling point. I think that's what ticks some people off; not the fact that they have a large chest, but the fact that it's there either as an obvious selling point, or they're exaggerated to the point of ridiculous (which leads back to the first reason).

 

[Requia]

^ Did you just imply blockbusters are for straight white men? Maybe they are. But why? To my knowledge, most of humanity isn't a straight white man.

Does this mean there should never be an oversexualized woman in a game ever? That there is absolutely no room for designs like these?

<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.406654.16934894>Yes. Exactly. Women are stupid and gay and they hate sex unlike the poor oppressed rational men like you.

This is what gamers actually believe.

It might help if your rant had anything at all to do with the game at hand. The design *is* the same ridiculously overexagerated style for both genders, and the Amazon that's meant to slice open dragons as opposed to cast spells looks like she can actually do it (hell, she looks more qualified than either of the men, the dwarf would have trouble walking and the warrior couldn't stand period). Also, Marcus Fenix is good design, seriously? He's a joke, another hypersteroid character from an artist who doesn't understand basic human anatomy, at least Dragon's Crown characters aren't billed as realistic.

Fenix is a stupid hyper-roided dudebro design in a stupid hyper-roided dudebro universe. He's ugly, but he fits.

The Sorceress and Amazon come along actively strutting their stuff in the middle of a forest/dungeon/fortress/whatever for absolutely nobody but the creep on the other side of the fourth wall. If its devs gave the slightest fuck about aesthetic consistency, then why aren't the Wizard, Dwarf and Warrior strutting about in a snug chainmail G-string graciously outlining their thick, throbbing, permanently erect cocks?

In no way shape or form would erect cocks be comparable, in order for that to be the case the Amazon would have to have swollen genitalia of her own. And oh wait, the dwarf isn't wearing anything but a miniskirt anyway.

 

[JimB]

Does this mean there should never be an oversexualized woman in a game ever? That there is absolutely no room for designs like these?

Sure, there's room. There's also room to design black characters who wear bib-alls without a shirt and crow, "Sho nuff, massa!" every time a white person speaks. That there is room to do so does not mean it's a good idea, or that it's being done in good taste or context, or that no one has a right to be offended.

If so, that would make all the angry peeps far more intolerant than what we've seen from the game industry.

Arguable, since the game industry's position seems to be that they will market to heterosexual, male gamers to the exclusion of female gamers, who are not welcome.

How about we save all the rage for things that matters, eh?

If you insist on belittling others' priorities as irrelevant, I think it is incumbent upon you to prove that their priorities are genuinely harmless.

I agree, yet feminists will find issue with anything that doesn't conform to their ideal, while failing to realize that many other genres exist and that they can make/support "good" games.

You seem to be arguing that hanging a "No Girls Allowed" sign on your clubhouse is not hateful and exclusionary because girls can go to their own, smaller clubhouse; and as best I can tell, you're calling feminists jerks for disliking what you like without offering any argument as to why they shouldn't take issue with something they find problematic. I think that argument is ridiculous on its face.

 

[ZippyDSMlee]

Since comics have not moved on from the mostly male demographics I do not see gaming doing it anytime soon.

 

[Lee Oyd]

in order for that to be the case the Amazon would have to have swollen genitalia of her own.

This is what gamers actually believe.

 

[the December King]

I like her!

I like the well-rounded asthetic of the game. It has a planned and executed look and feel. I think it's sexy, but not in a sexual way- I think that the characters all convey a whimsical, colorful style that appeals to me. Although some of the individual characters sexuality is heavily exaggerated, it feels congruous to the style.

 

[Seldon2639]

The problem is that no one really gives a good god damn about the aesthetics itself, they care about how the aesthetic reflects on themselves. It's not Jason Schreier saying "this seems like it might be a problem in the design" or even "I don't like how it looks. The entire complaint is about what he thinks the rest of society will think of him, or about gamers, as a result of this.

And that's the kind of silly "OMG what will people think about me because I play this/read this/watch this" that is anathema to creating art. And it's self-censorship of the wimpiest kind, a statement that you hold yourself in so little regard that you would forgo things you otherwise like because of what other people might think about it. I can respect anyone saying "I don't like how it looks", but the people saying it's bad because of what it makes the player appear to be need to grow a spine.

If you feel like you can't play this game without being viewed as a repressed sexual deviant/immature person, you are a repressed sexual deviant and immature person. Because nowhere in Mr. Schreier's post did he say he disliked it, just that he worried about what other people would think about him.

I'm reminded of my younger brother, who when he was 13 set about tearing up all of the Pokemon cards he'd ever gotten (most from me or my older brother). And the reason for this is that he didn't want to seem childish, especially not in front of an older girl whom he admires. But maturity doesn't come from giving up childish things, it comes from being willing to say "this is what I like, and if you think that says something bad about me, you can go away."

But instead, we're worried about what our media says about us, because we're secretly worried that it's true. My brother rejects Pokemon because he's worried that he might still be a little kid. And Schreier rejects Dragon Crown because he's worried about the fact that he might just like big breasts and improbable figures. And what's sad from the other side is that instead of saying "go for it, like it, but it's concerning that there are very few female leads who aren't built like this", they stick with "OMG if you like this you're a pig."

 

[Thyunda]

^ Did you just imply blockbusters are for straight white men? Maybe they are. But why? To my knowledge, most of humanity isn't a straight white man.

Does this mean there should never be an oversexualized woman in a game ever? That there is absolutely no room for designs like these?

<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/jump/18.406654.16934894>Yes. Exactly. Women are stupid and gay and they hate sex unlike the poor oppressed rational men like you.

This is what gamers actually believe.

It might help if your rant had anything at all to do with the game at hand. The design *is* the same ridiculously overexagerated style for both genders, and the Amazon that's meant to slice open dragons as opposed to cast spells looks like she can actually do it (hell, she looks more qualified than either of the men, the dwarf would have trouble walking and the warrior couldn't stand period). Also, Marcus Fenix is good design, seriously? He's a joke, another hypersteroid character from an artist who doesn't understand basic human anatomy, at least Dragon's Crown characters aren't billed as realistic.

Fenix is a stupid hyper-roided dudebro design in a stupid hyper-roided dudebro universe. He's ugly, but he fits.

The Sorceress and Amazon come along actively strutting their stuff in the middle of a forest/dungeon/fortress/whatever for absolutely nobody but the creep on the other side of the fourth wall. If its devs gave the slightest fuck about aesthetic consistency, then why aren't the Wizard, Dwarf and Warrior strutting about in a snug chainmail G-string graciously outlining their thick, throbbing, permanently erect cocks?

Because that's not male sexualisation. Giving them giant cocks in the same way women are given giant breasts is just intimidating. Instead they're just heaps of muscle, where the female characters have their feminine features exaggerated, the men have their masculine features.

And our sexual organs are not really our masculine features. Women might compare their breasts to their friends, but how many men do you see patting each other's crotches and going "Ohh bro your cock is so much bigger than mine I'm soooooo jealous of how good it looks in those CKs."

 

[Darken12]

Well said, Bob. Diversity is actually the answer to this. The more alternatives we see to over-sexualised women (non-sexualised women and over-sexualised men, for example, and no, a dude being shirtless is not over-sexualising him), the less harmful it will be for creators to over-sexualise women.

Diversity, socially and biologically, is always good, because more options is never a bad thing, and having a wealth of different choices and options maximises benefit for the maximum amount of people.

EDIT:

how many men do you see patting each other's crotches and going "Ohh bro your cock is so much bigger than mine I'm soooooo jealous of how good it looks in those CKs."

I've seen porn that goes like that, actually.

 

[RaikuFA]

Wall o text.

Basically: Since I didn't read about 6 to 7 pages of this I'm the worst thing to happen ever?

Just know this: There's a lot of people that are looking at games like this and screaming sexist and ban this sick filth, yet more popular games get a free pass? Thats a bit sad.

 

[wearesoneutralthatithurts]

This is the Diablo 3 Barbarian, capable of filling out the armor of a Chaos Space Marine Terminator Lord.

Then why she doesnt?

just an idea:
for this kind of fighting game you often can unplay costumes.
why not 2 or 4 sets of costumes, 2 pre set to choose for your fighter and 2 to get if you play good enough-so that everybunny can choose whether ze likes a naked burly dwarf or one inside an armor or a naked amazon only clothed with a few bits of ripped of cloth or an amazon in some FUCKING UNIFORM like a FUCKING AMAZON would do if she was FUCKING REASONABLE*

*because the last time i looked my muscles werent any bulledproof-not to mention magicproof.
(but the naked dwarf would have that same problem-except most dwarf (according to lore) are magicproof^^)


i dont like this half naked stuff if its dumb like that. if its tna for the horny but dumb masses. and well, most female character wear pieces of clothing which would dress nicely on a hooker but not on somebody who fights horde of undead (muscles aren´t zombie-proof either)the men get clothing-here the magic guy and the fighter have clothing-and even enough to make any wahabi muslim proud.
so here you have two-in-clothes vs one-naked-(2c, 1n)ratio on males and on the other side: two naked, one in clothes-but male gazed subjugated loli nonetheless( 2 1/2n 0,5c) on female side


and this pattern you´ll find every-fucking-where. more in games than in real life but annoyingly enough everywhere as well.(advertising. tits for lätta. yay..)

 

[wearesoneutralthatithurts]

I'm just curious...

Does this mean there should never be an oversexualized woman in a game ever? That there is absolutely no room for designs like these?

If so, that would make all the angry peeps far more intelorant than what we've seen from the game industry.

How about we save all the rage for things that matters, eh?

you arent curious, you are derailing, trolling and you are kissing a strawmen.(doenst that suck? such strawwy s´tongue. and all the dust.. but well, i don't know but maybe you are the reason why there is straw on the ground..


that´s !?§($&)/)%!!! and maybe you want to stop and READ bobs text as well as look at Jim´s show and them READ comments.

and then you should think about that stuff you´ve read, if you´re able to do so (because after so much information you might be tired-but dont be scared, this will go away). and be silent. and then you might get that this idiotic shit is annoying because reasonable people have to tell people like you the same stuff over and over again-stiff you might hav read yourself if you weren't so lazy and want other people to make work for you(which is rude)

so read thoroughly, the whole thread and then tell me 1 to 5 comments here of people who vote for the bullshit you are strawman-ing right now.

maybe you´ll find some.

i bet not

and i bet you know this. (if not:then your are only rude and lazy.)
and if you knew, then you are a annoying troll and therefore after that best be ignored.

 

[Gunjester]

The art style is meant to be ridiculous, it's meant to be cartoonish, and if a man sees the Sorceress and says "THAT is what a woman should look like!" That's something wrong with him, not the artist.

I, at least, am not worried about what men think a woman should look like. I'm worried about what my six-year-old niece is learning she needs to look like.

Why would a six-year-old be playing this game? It's clearly going to be released as either M or T, if your niece is impacted by it because she doesn't get the joke, as she shouldn't, maybe you should take a look at the parents letting her play it. You shouldn't restrict the artist because you or your sibling is stupid enough to let their child play a game made for a much older group.
And for the record, if a six-year-old girl was playing this game, it's far more likely she'd emulate the character who she relates to the most, probably more like the Elf, who's only strange feature is thick legs: http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/22700000/Dragon-s-Crown-dragons-crown-22778778-720-800.jpg
EDIT: Having just watched the Jimquisition on this very topic, I humbly apologize for the points I've made above are extremely harshly worded. I do not mean to offend, I merely saw your comment as an illogical shouting-spurt at me and thus react illogically. I merely say that this game is meant for older audiences, and my point about the elf was in fact mentioned in the video. I won't change anything about the above post, however, as I feel a before/after shot of this argument is necessary for it to become a discussion.

 

[JimB]

Why would a six-year-old be playing this game?

As I said in my previous post [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/6.406690-It-Never-Ends?page=8#16948576] in this thread, I am using my niece as a symbol for all the girls out there who are still trying to figure out what it means to be human and female, and I am using this character as a symbol for every character like the Sorceress.

I merely saw your comment as an illogical shouting-spurt at me and thus reacted illogically.

I kind of worry that these conversations are doomed to failure if what I said came across to you as shouting, because I really do not know how I could have phrased it differently to make it more clear that I was only correcting one point that I felt was misapprehended. I worry that there's too much baggage attached to this topic for most people to see the other side as anything but a horde of gibbering goblins who are out to destroy everything the other side stands for out of pure hate.

Oh, well.

My point about the Elf was in fact mentioned in the video.

I would argue that the Elf is also sexualized to a fetishistic degree, but by Japanese standards rather than Western. I'm by no means an expert, but as I understand it, the Japanese standard for female sexual attractiveness is innocence and childlike presentation, such as the Elf offers.

 

[TTYTYTTYYTTYTTTY]

I agree, yet feminists will find issue with anything that doesn't conform to their ideal, while failing to realize that many other genres exist and that they can make/support "good" games.

You seem to be arguing that hanging a "No Girls Allowed" sign on your clubhouse is not hateful and exclusionary because girls can go to their own, smaller clubhouse; and as best I can tell, you're calling feminists jerks for disliking what you like without offering any argument as to why they shouldn't take issue with something they find problematic. I think that argument is ridiculous on its face.

And? The AAA game industry as it is now is like only being able to choose summer action movies, when you go to a theater. Many people voice disdain for Micheal Bay and the Twilight films, but there are other films you can watch. Why is it so hard for many "people" to realize that they should be investing in more genres, rather than conformity?

Remember if it can be proven profitable, then will companies and investors take it full force.

 

[JimB]

And?

I...don't know what you expect me to say to this that I haven't already said. And excluding women from the gaming community is deliberately cutting the market off from fifty-one percent of the people on the planet? And it's an insult to human dignity to be told what games I am allowed to play based on my crotch? And there is nothing worth defending in the AAA boys-only paradigm, so I find it baffling that you do so as if you think women being invited to enjoy the games you play would somehow reduce what you have?