Jimquisition: Go Fish

Recommended Videos

ninjaRiv

New member
Aug 25, 2010
986
0
0
I learnt how to spot bullies pretty quickly while growing up and I think Fish is one of them. He acts like a dick, putting people down to make himself feel better, and then he throws a fit when other bullies bully him worse. If you behave like a ****, bigger cunts will attack you, especially when you're not very good at handling it. I don't blame him for lashing out at Beer or anyone else who insults him but that's not all he did, is it. We've all seen his little "Japanese video games suck" video by now, in which he insults a man who can barely speak English and then his friends laugh. Is that the kind of guy anyone should feel sorry for? Is there no way to dislike Fish AND the people who insulted him? Is it not possible the only victims are the people Fish insulted and the innocent people insulted by Fish' "attackers"?

Bottom Line: Fish behaved poorly and attracted worse behaviour. He should seriously grow the fuck up.
 

xPixelatedx

New member
Jan 19, 2011
1,316
0
0
Necromancer Jim said:
xPixelatedx said:
I think this is a case of "an eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind" here. Except it ends with the whole world being assholes to each other. If we're not going to act like he was a victim, we certainly can't act as if the people threatening to rape and murder his family were justified. Yes, he was an asshole. Yes, people were assholes to him. Is there karma for them? If that is in the form of people being assholes, will those people have karma after them?

Phil Fish certainly was not a nice man, I will not deny that. He seems like he was awful to a lot of people, but then it seems that many more people were much, much worse to him. He was a victim here, but he wasn't the only victim and he wasn't only a victim. The comments he made were not justified, nor was the sheer magnitude of hate he received. I won't deny that he was in the wrong, but the people insulting and threatening him certainly aren't in the right.
There is no karma for people uniting against a common enemy, and he simply made too many enemies in his short time with us. No, I don't agree that two wrongs make a right, but I am also not surprised in the LEAST at the conclusion this took. You reap what you sow. The guy lathered his naked body with chum, and jumped into a pool of piranhas. Are we really supposed to feel bad about that? Are we supposed to blame the piranhas? People can only stand so much before they get pissed, and what you could be mistaken in suggesting is they should have kept their mouth shut and just took the beating he was dishing out. "Gamers are horrible people", "this ethnicity is stupid at making video games", etc. Should non-anonymous (and famous) people be able to bait everyone so thoroughly and come out totally unscathed? Is that really a more idealistic world?
Being so antagonistic himself, I can only surmise he thought the fact that he made videogames was a satisfactory shield against such opposition. The utter arrogance and sense of privilege that implies is just insane. When you talk to the world like you're a 14 year old 4chan poster, expect the world to talk back like 14 year old 4chan posters; that goes with ANY TOPIC. People really need to just try and be more decent human beings if they want the world to treat them better, because at the end of the day people really can surprise you in good ways. All you have to do is treat them with a bit of respect and decency, and convey controversial opinions in civilized manners.

As for the death threats? The whole "anonymous internet tough guy thing" is just that. We all know no one is hunting down his family, sending an alien invasion fleet to his house or anything so ludicrous. Taking people's insane claims on the internet as fact is a childish thing to do, especially given the context that this guy is just getting reverse trolled. People were just shouting disturbing things at him to try and get under his skin, and given his reaction, it worked. That's as much his fault as it is theirs, given he's a professional troll himself.

When your great debut to the world of gaming is "Fuck all ya guyz", you can expect the rest of your career here to be filled with """abuse"""(there simply isn't enough quotation marks for that word). That isn't 'an eye for an eye', it's reality.

The comments he made were not justified, nor was the sheer magnitude of hate he received.
That video I posted? He might not have committed a crime against humanity there, but he made himself out to be the absolute most loathsome kind of person imaginable, just in personality traits alone. You have to understand, what he did was the equivalent of beating up a physically disabled person (or anyone else who literally couldn't throw a punch back). When someone who has traveled so far comes up to you, and makes it clear they don't fully understand your language, the absolute worse thing you can do is immediately talk shit to them and then proceed to make-fun of them. Fish elaborating on his opinions didn't help either, because remember, that japanese guy barley understood English... so how the hell was he supposed to argue or defend himself!? *spoiler warning* he couldn't. They attacked someone who couldn't possibly have defended himself in front of a crowd, then pointed and laughed. Yeah, he both consciously and subconsciously advertised to the entire world from then on he was the worst, most pathetic kind of person. People remember this kind of stuff forever, so every incident he incited from then on got over-reactions.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
Hello Jim,

Thanks for taking the time to make this video. I always enjoy additional content from them.

I think in the case of Fish in particular, the problem is with a widely percieved issue of arrogance on his part alongside a consistent failure to produce work in any reasonable timeframe. And not the kind of show arrogance that makes your videos so entertaining. The real, "I'm a golden god" sort of thing is what people imagine when thinking about Fish. That being said, whether the percieved arrogance is performance (yours) or evident (his), the effect is still the same. I'm sure a lot of the complaints against him strike home for you. I'm sure a lot of the asses that don't get your work levy the same complaints/threats against you so you can see a fellow victim in Fish. A minor difference being that you have people who do get and love your work to fall back on who actually understand your intention. When you're attacked, it's actually a stage version of you being insulted (although I'm sure some insults hit you personally even if aimed at Stage Jim). Fish doesn't have that luxury.

In any event, people love to see the arrogant fail. So Fish is confronted on two fronts. One by scathing reports/media people who have nothing better to do than generate news by prodding him to see what he'll say next (I mean, think about it, how much publicity did poor little Beer get here? Hah), and again by onlookers who view him as a one-hit wonder being crushed under the weight of his own ego who think he deserves that nonesense. I'm not saying this to take a side or anything like that, I'm just examining the public reaction. I think people are taking cheap shots at Fish and he's been under clear duress from them for years. I don't know many people who wouldn't have cracked under that kind of persistent pressure. I also don't know the guy, I have no idea if he's actually arrogant or not and that's no reason for me to want him to suffer and certainly not to see him fail. The only complaint a person could bring against him is merely the way he lashed out and not that he lashed out.

Hopefully he'll be able to adjust and learn how to swim with the sharks. Or even better, maybe he can become an unapologetic shark himself and give us an entertaining personality who eats and poops reports that try to snipe at him. The best response Fish could have given is an unrepentant, "When I told him to kill himself, I specifically meant he should stuff his head up his own ass until he suffocated or choked on feces." I mean, he was angry, sure, but he might as well own it. It's not like an apology would matter to anyone. Kudos to you for speaking out on this. I appreciate your work.
 

wolfyrik

New member
Jun 18, 2012
131
0
0
Mr_Terrific said:
You can hate Fish all you like but the bottom line is this...

Fish makes games. Some would even call him a game maker. We are now short one game maker because someone of little value in this industry felt entitled....not for his own publication, but Game Informer of all places. This person of little value who only talks about video games threw shit at someone the industry actually NEEDS, and it just happened to be one shit too many.

Not a fan of Fez and never even heard of Phil Fish prior to this weekend, but I know the industry needs more creators and needs a whole lot less people like the Annoyed Gamer.

The real issue is the entitlement of some of these....I don't even know what to call them...what? Videogame talker critic people? I mean, they're most certainly not journalists. Journalists have standards report the news, not rumors. Journalists usually have expectations that they must met or they will be held accountable.

So when a guy like Beer gets pissy at Fish and Blow for not gossiping or commenting on a (at the time) rumor, it only highlights why gaming media cannot be taken seriously and why the industry would be better off without 95% of them. Gaming media has been shit for YEARS. This isn't new and neither is this sort of behavior. Fish has at least made a contribution to this industry. What has gaming media done for the industry? These are the same people that will line up to call gamers whiny and entitled for not enjoying the shit Mass Effect ending, and will call out developers as whiny and entitled for not commenting on rumors. Yeah....95% sounds about right.

I'd include Sterling in that number but he seems to be the only one with the balls to call out EA and other pigs in this industry.

Lastly, yeah Jim...you can't pick a side because of David Cage. You basically did the same thing only you took it quite a few steps beyond.
Beer, Fish, Blow....it sounds like a bad night out in Blackpool....
 

WesternGamer

New member
Jul 6, 2010
13
0
0
xPixelatedx said:
They were not attacking the man, just giving their views on modern japanese games which is exactly what the guy asked. All of the designers are on record many times saying that they dislike modern games as a whole, not just japanese ones, but the question was narrowed to modern japanese games. Were these people supposed to lie about their views? I think most people stopped watching this video as soon as Fish said his thing given the amount of "what about Dark Souls?" comments popping up. His comments about Zelda are spot on.
 

theApoc

New member
Oct 17, 2008
252
0
0
Developers make games for a living, most of them do this because they love games. I don't know many steel workers who love working in dangerous, hot and downright tedious conditions. Phish is a hipster douche, who should be happy that people pay any attention to him at all. He should grow a pair OR do the smart thing and ignore the masses. Just make his games, try to make some cash, and enjoy the praise from the people who actually like the guy.

The problem with the game industry is not the backlash from fans but rather the sense of entitlement at every level. Developers think they deserve academy awards for making mediocre games, or in that rare instance where they actually make a great game, they think everything else they touch will be gold. Publishers think that every crappy story/concept is a franchise and fans are too stupid to speak with their wallets as opposed to railing against some wussbag hipster like Phish on twitter.

In the real word, accolades and respect often have to be earned through hard work and by giving what you expect for yourself to others.

Let Phish go work at best buy or something like the rest of the worthless 20 somethings.
 

Ishal

New member
Oct 30, 2012
1,177
0
0
Necromancer Jim said:
Yes, he was an asshole. Yes, people were assholes to him. Is there karma for them? If that is in the form of people being assholes, will those people have karma after them?
Yes, there will be karma for them but we won't see it or know about. What goes around comes around. That is the concept of karma.

Phil Fish certainly was not a nice man, I will not deny that. He seems like he was awful to a lot of people, but then it seems that many more people were much, much worse to him. He was a victim here, but he wasn't the only victim and he wasn't only a victim. The comments he made were not justified, nor was the sheer magnitude of hate he received. I won't deny that he was in the wrong, but the people insulting and threatening him certainly aren't in the right.
You act as if a good chunk of the world aren't assholes to each other already. There are multiple reasons the internet can be such a hateful and spiteful place, this is one of those reasons. The problem with a lot of us is we lack the sense to look at the bigger picture. You and I could stumble into a thread and find something like what is above and pass judgement on it. But the thing is, what we see is only salvo #14 of a conflict that has been ongoing for who knows how long. Things happen for reasons. Fish was an asshole, thus people react in kind. Nothing happens without a reason or cause, nothing. We may deem the cause childish, ignorant, stupid, foolish, asinine, irrelevant, or any other thing, and we may be correct. But there is still a cause.

What happened was to be expected. The people who threatened Fish and his family are reprehensible, but Fish brought himself down to their level by that "go kill yourself' quip. By doing that, he gives himself considerably less and less ground to stand on. Actions have consequences, he made himself a future victim when he opened his mouth.
 

Elijah Newton

New member
Sep 17, 2008
456
0
0
Regarding death threats - surely we can all agree that threats of violence are completely inappropriate to either side of any online debate, especially anything having to do with games. Yet they happen all the time. It's the most casually accepted WTF of gaming culture.

Why don't we here ( or somebody / anybody anywhere, really ) come up with something like Godwin's law ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law ). A "a memetic tool to reduce the incidence of inappropriate hyperbole," if you'll pardon the paraphrase. The way I've seen Godwin's law applied - and this is anecdotal, so correct me if I'm wrong - is that when it's cited it instantly discredits whoever made the offending comparison involving Nazis or Hitler. It wards against lazy arguments.

I feel like the same thing should be done with death threats. I'm not saying they will go away or must be verbotten, but culturally we need some phrase to reference as a shorthand for thread readers to say of a post 'You've got to be kidding me, dial it back because you've lost all credibility,' thereby creating a disincentive to throw death threats around as a rhetorical device.

@ Jim - Great bit, and please add me to the chorus of Jimquisition fans who also like this more casual format.

Mcoffey said:
It sometimes seems to me that the game community is the best and worst parts of the sports and arthouse communities combined. We get the competitive hostility of sports, mixed with the smug superiority complex of arthouse. On the flip side we also get the camaraderie from being on a team, and the desire to reach new heights and higher standards.
*applause* Well put, man! I hadn't thought about it in quite that way before.
 

tontje

New member
Jun 4, 2012
9
0
0
Meh, don't know the guy and "his" games are not my type but for situations
like this i generally say: "Suck it up princess." don't boohoo about random internet guys it's a sticks and stones kind of thing.
There are plenty of people who appreciate but you just don't hear from them.
 

Kuro Serpentina

New member
Dec 10, 2012
50
0
0
As someone who has often gotten a lot of flakk for having especially violent outburst when angered, this does speak to me quite a bit, in ways I'm not entirely sure of in their true scope
Thanks Jim, I feel this was something that was very much needed to be said
Thank Lain for Jim
 

TiberiusEsuriens

New member
Jun 24, 2010
834
0
0
Jim,

In Phil's final responses he actually singled out Marcus AND YOU for being 'terrible stains of the internet.' I was surprised that you didn't even mention this. Any reason why? Also, I'm quite a fan of how this was such an extremely calm and rational episode. It's a sensitive situation and being able to handle this with care shows a great amount of class that most people don't think you have!
 

tardcore

New member
Jan 15, 2011
103
0
0
I'd never heard of this guy before now. After doing some research I have to say on one hand its sad to see the guy throw his entire career away like a child kicking over a checkers board and storming out of the room. But, on the other hand he's been guilty of some pretty bad behavior of his own so I personally feel he's just reaping what he sews.
 

forlornhope22

New member
Feb 18, 2013
12
0
0
TheOrb said:
I now feel as if I should've sent Jim some hate mail, it seems I've been missing out on one of the many channels of community interaction.

I should make it well-written, too, as it's my first...
It's for posts like these where I wish you could upvote shit like reddit. Nevertheless, You've earned this.


*TAKE IT*