You know that that's EXACTLY what Extra Credits said?Champion Argos said:The case is said to decide if video games will be considered an artistic medium. This means that if the court decides it has no artistic value then it will no longer be protected by the first amendments right to free speach and expression. This means that laws can be placed on video games, regulating what content can and cannot be placed on those shiny discs we all cherish so much. Pray for us all.
Ah, the problem isn't that the law is trying to regulate games being sold to minors. The law opens a flood gate that allows every state in the USA to have their own view of what is appropriate as a video game.Furious Styles said:My understanding of this is clearly flawed, I though it sought to ban the sale of 18 rated games to kids under 18.
Fancy doing silly thing like that!
How will this effect more than just California though? I'm not American and haven't really been following this so I need someone to help fill me in because people seem to be taking this very seriously. Like apocalypse of games seriously.sliverwings1123 said:I love this state, what with our laws that hold down minorities and now regulation of video games
No. 16 years ago was '93. It's 2010.KiruTheMant said:16 years ago was 1984 o_oThe Austin said:Twenty seven years ago. Sixteen Years ago was '93.Gxas said:Whats up 1984? I thought you happened sixteen years ago.
OP: NO!
I support the first amendment, and as such, this law must not pass!
Its '10 buddy.
Hmm... I guess I just can't relate to it because I'm not from the States. My perspective is making me look like a douche here because I'm not bothered with it.lacktheknack said:You missed the point. Laws DO spread like wildfire when they're barely held back then suddenly it breaks through, especially in the States. There's much, much, MUCH more tension then you think there is.Folio said:I wonder... There were game titles never released in some parts of the world. It's not like releasing became a domino effect...lacktheknack said:But if California goes down, you've knocked over a domino, thus all the other states that are suspicious re-enact their bills (they'll probably go through). Bang, America is now hostile to games. Too bad most devs are from America.Folio said:CALIFORNIA'S law will wreck entire companies in America, Europe, Japan and the rest of the world!
California is not the world... Your governor is from Austria, another part of the planet. (see where I'm going with this?)
So you can't play every game in California. Move. Besides, California isn't really the place to stay inside.
Domino effect: It sucks.
Besides, Sweden doesn't have a law against illegal downloading, even though the rest of the world clearly tries to fight it.
Switzerland stays neutral in any way. The Netherlands allows smoking pot as long as it's home grown, it's illegal to distribute it out of the country. Not every law spreads like wildfire.
If it did, we all would be aware not to go skydiving with a donkey in a bathtub. (there seriously is some kind of law for that. I'm dead serious!|-( Really, what the hell?)
From my experiences and study, children are about the least innocent creatures on the planet.Mr. Omega said:Expect twenty responses from anti-gaming groups to call this man an "Un-American disgusting man who seeks to aid in corrupting our innocent children."
If our government was incapable of making stupid decisions in the face of economic crisis, we wouldn't still be in an economic crisis.Folio said:I even wonder if America can ban games with the current economy and all.