dannymc18 said:
I'm anti-censorship and anti-lazy-high-profile-news-outlets-looking-for-a-cheap-bit-of-scandal-and-controversy, however, a line must be drawn somewhere.
I have some bad new for you. When you draw a line, and then say that that line that you drew is where everyone's line gets drawn, you aren't anti-censorship. The act of drawing a line for everyone is exactly what censorship is.
I'm not a fan of these games myself, but their existence is not hurting people. It's
offending some people, yes. But my existence offends some people (or at least I try to make sure it does, as it makes life more interesting) and that doesn't mean they get to ban me. They don't even get to ask me to stop being offensive. That's what freedom of speech, expression and whatnot means. It means that there will be things out there that you
will find extremely offensive, and you
don't get to make them go away. You just get to choose not to look.
Society as a whole does censor things, for better or worse. I'm of the opinion that it can feel free to censor things that involve actual harm being done to actual people who aren't consenting to said harm occurring to them*. Or, in the case of the oft cited child porn, aren't of an age of legal consent. However, no matter how personally distasteful I find anything else, I'm all for it for the folk who like that sort of thing. That's their choice to make, not mine.
*I left out this consenting part in a similar argument in the past and found that it's like unleashing a 5.1 on the richter scale below Mount St Helen's north slope circa 1980. Leave this part out and people start arguing that boxing should be banned (they made some good points though!).