Man Forgot Loaded Handgun in His Carry-On, TSA Forgot To Notice

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
This really doesn't help the TSA... which is good! Hopefully instead of touching little kids they can focus on the people with guns on them.

You know, the whole fucking reason they started the tight security?
 

Bob_F_It

It stands for several things
May 7, 2008
711
0
0
Well, that's a royal f***-up and a half. You'd think after 9/11, they'd actually try to stop weapons being taken onto planes. Maybe the TSA just employs horribly lazy idiots who don't realise the importance of their jobs.
 

Csae

New member
Sep 8, 2010
42
0
0
archvile93 said:
justcallmeslow said:
I find it worrying enough that people can wander around with loaded handguns, let alone take them on planes. Every part of this story is silly.
Yeah, but unlike you, if I end up in an alley for some reason I'm not getting mugged.

OT: This is why I don't support these restricting laws. TSA can't even do jack shit with them anyway.
You don't get mugged, you get killed. Horrah ?
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
justcallmeslow said:
I find it worrying enough that people can wander around with loaded handguns, let alone take them on planes. Every part of this story is silly.
The planes part is the silly bit but why is it worrying that people can carry a weapon on their person? What fundamentally distinguishes the weapon a peace officer carries and the one a private citizen carries? Do you worry that somehow the private citizen is less adept at the use of the weapon? That they are somehow less responsible?
 

Cliff_m85

New member
Feb 6, 2009
2,581
0
0
If everyone on the plane had a loaded weapon no terrorist attacks could ever take place successfully.

"ALLAH AKB---*BLAM*"
 

theshadavid

Nerrrrrrrd
Aug 10, 2009
242
0
0
justcallmeslow said:
I find it worrying enough that people can wander around with loaded handguns, let alone take them on planes. Every part of this story is silly.
Keep in mind this is a Middle Eastern man who lives in Texas. I'd want protection also.
 

WorldCritic

New member
Apr 13, 2009
3,021
0
0
That's hilarious. I mean it wouldn't have been if someone was hurt, but as it is, it's hilarious.
 

archvile93

New member
Sep 2, 2009
2,564
0
0
Csae said:
archvile93 said:
justcallmeslow said:
I find it worrying enough that people can wander around with loaded handguns, let alone take them on planes. Every part of this story is silly.
Yeah, but unlike you, if I end up in an alley for some reason I'm not getting mugged.

OT: This is why I don't support these restricting laws. TSA can't even do jack shit with them anyway.
You don't get mugged, you get killed. Horrah ?
No, I shoot him, problem solved, or he leaves me alone when he finds out I'm armed. These people are cowards, they rarely if ever prey on those with the means to defend themselves. Besides, gun laws don't work anyway, but that's an argument for another thread.
 

Jaebird

New member
Aug 19, 2008
1,298
0
0
katsumoto03 said:
Jbird said:
manythings said:
Well it's because they are too busy taking all the 5 year olds out of line to strip search them in the secure, unsupervised area.
I've heard it's suppose to be referred to as "play time". No joke, too.
No... Just no... >_<

Also, this is silly. How can you be the most overprotective agency to date, and strip search 80% (Source: My ass) of people but miss a guy with a handgun?

For shame, TSA! For shame!
I bet what set off the red flags that day was a guy bringing wool socks in his carry on luggage.
 

CrystalShadow

don't upset the insane catgirl
Apr 11, 2009
3,829
0
0
Ugh. See, It's been said many times by various groups that airport security is actually worthless, and this just seems to prove it.

The problem seems to be the security screening of passengers is mostly pretence. Smoke and mirrors designed to make people feel like something is being done about security.

But in reality, it's all quite worthless.

Or at least, that's the theory some people work with.

But unfortunately, incidents like this one seem to prove the point.
 

direkiller

New member
Dec 4, 2008
1,655
0
0
Not G. Ivingname said:
Thinking about it, requiring 2-5 air marshals (depending on the size of the plane) put randomly in the plane in desguise would protect flights far better then any sensor that the TSA can make.
There are over 85000 flights in the US per day. That just not possible to do as you would need about a half a million air marshals.

OT: Well this isint surprising my dad manage to walk though airport security 3 times with a leather men in his cary-on. The TSA is just a joke
 

x434343

New member
Mar 22, 2008
1,276
0
0
bl4ckh4wk64 said:
x434343 said:
justcallmeslow said:
I find it worrying enough that people can wander around with loaded handguns, let alone take them on planes. Every part of this story is silly.
Well, all states have concealed-carry liscenses. It depends on the nature of the state laws as to how difficult it is toget them.

In Texas, its like, a 6 hour class and a fee for the liscense. In California, it's classes that take MORE time than to get pilot certification. So, more than 150 hours to get a concealed-carry liscense.

Texas, somehow (possibly due to the person you're commiting a crime against has a gun on them?), has a lower crime rate than California.
Dude, I live in CA and it takes longer than 150 hours for a CCW. You need to be either military or police in my area (LA). You also have to give them a reason as to why you want to concealed carry and it has to be better than, "I need to defend myself and I don't want whoever is threatening me to know I have a gun."
Bingo. 150 is the number of hours to get a PILOTING liscense. For an Aircraft. Something like 1,000 for concealed firearm. So, what the hell is up with that? 150 hours for a tube of metal filled with fuel, or 1000 for a hidden gun. Something doesn't make sense.
 

Danpascooch

Zombie Specialist
Apr 16, 2009
5,231
0
0
Patrick Dare said:
I'm glad to hear this at least wasn't blown out of proportion with him getting arrested, etc. as seems to always happen.
He's actually REALLY lucky, if he was caught up front they might think he's a terrorist and arrest him, but since he was at his destination and didn't, you know, hijack that plane, it was clear he wasn't
 

Scow2

New member
Aug 3, 2009
801
0
0
I think the forumite saying this guy needs to be reprimanded for his action is out of line... Even if there is a chance he did this as a stunt, it's still a viable possibility that the guy realised he made an honest mistake in bringing the gun on the plane, and, like a lot of people are taught to do, tried to own up to his mistake by reporting the incident. (I do admit having nothing but the gun in there is fishy, but it doesn't invalidate the events as they happened)

He didn't bother to check to make sure something he reflexively carries with him wasn't on his person. A gun, despite its size, isn't fundamentally different from a wallet, cell phone, keychain, or other commonly carried accessory when it comes to being overlooked or forgotten.

And what about our security policies being "too considerate and inoffensive"? We're already potentially molesting children (And going against the anti-molestation education taught to kids:"Remember kiddies, don't let anyone touch you in certain areas or do something that makes you feel uncomfortable... Unless they are a TSA Agents"), sexually harrassing and abusing both men and women, and otherwise grossly violating people's rights and senses of decency. And to date, we have yet to find or thwart ANY terrorist threats through these means. How much further indignity is required before "Our methods are thorough enough."

Passengers, flight personnel, and rent-a-cop-style security is likely enough to stop these problems. Humans are a lot more intuitive than computers and scanners. Right now, passengers are the #1 threat detectors, because they aren't cluttered with "false alarms" to see when somethings fishy.

Proper proceedure: No fancy toys. No ludicrous, invasive regulations. If a passenger or Flight member notices someone behaving abnormally or threateningly, they either address the person directly or get the nearest "rent-a-cop" to settle the issue personally, amicably, and fairly. Genuine threats will be dealt with appropriately, while the Lawful Stupid insanity goes away. More results, less effort, fewer pissed of citizens.
 

CloggedDonkey

New member
Nov 4, 2009
4,055
0
0
And here I was expecting no racist comments about a country that is dearly loved by millions! Silly me!

OT: I believe I have an image of the person who checked his bag right here.