One person already made a comment about it, and I made a Crusoe joke about it.Snowalker said:No one commenting on the fact the dude name is FUCKING MACKINTOSH... Escapists, you're letting me down.
Y U NO SEE IT?!
One person already made a comment about it, and I made a Crusoe joke about it.Snowalker said:No one commenting on the fact the dude name is FUCKING MACKINTOSH... Escapists, you're letting me down.
yes they can, youre not allowed to even look a customer in the eye without their permission lest you get a beatdown for making the customer madmaddawg IAJI said:They wouldn't get fired for touching a customer if she is acting hostile towards themRaikuFA said:and what have the coworkers get fired over it? you know theyd get fired for even touching her
Yeah, because I think people with histories of violence and serious impulse control problems deserve my pity. /internetsarcasmDarius Brogan said:That's a little bit harsh for a guy who had a history of violence, and therefore has serious impulse control problems.Lolth17 said:Luckily the law does not agree with the internet. Using a deadly weapon against an unarmed opponent is very, very much illegal, and I sincerely hope he gets locked up and the key thrown far, far away.
In the video, he's obviously trying to walk away from the women to prevent conflict, ad the women corner him to continue their assault.
Even the MOST reserved human being would react violently when their physical well-being is threatened, especially if there's no way around the situation. Given this guys violent history, the stunned cunts are lucky he didn't beat them to death.
This is another perfect example of 'You never know who you're fucking with'. My best advice in any situation like this is "So don't fuck with people, because there's a good chance they'll beat you to death"
Yeah, you're so obviously right. Now that I think about it the only way he could have handled that situation was to beat the women mercilessly with a metal stick, it was so obvious I don't know how I missed it. Give this guy a raise, not jail time!Darius Brogan said:Yes, blame the mentally unstable guy with anger issues that two stunned cunts penned him behind the counter and tried to assault him verbally and physically because they had a counterfeit $50 in their purse.jpoon said:Damn, that moron is obviously right back where he should be (in jail). Looks like McDumpster's was a bit too stressful for that guy.
That makes so much sense.
Oh man, I've always wanted to do this!Lolth17 said:Yeah, because I think people with histories of violence and serious impulse control problems deserve my pity. /internetsarcasmDarius Brogan said:That's a little bit harsh for a guy who had a history of violence, and therefore has serious impulse control problems.Lolth17 said:Luckily the law does not agree with the internet. Using a deadly weapon against an unarmed opponent is very, very much illegal, and I sincerely hope he gets locked up and the key thrown far, far away.
In the video, he's obviously trying to walk away from the women to prevent conflict, ad the women corner him to continue their assault.
Even the MOST reserved human being would react violently when their physical well-being is threatened, especially if there's no way around the situation. Given this guys violent history, the stunned cunts are lucky he didn't beat them to death.
This is another perfect example of 'You never know who you're fucking with'. My best advice in any situation like this is "So don't fuck with people, because there's a good chance they'll beat you to death"
The point is, you are not allowed to retaliate to non-deadly force with deadly force. In other words, no matter how many times you slap me in the face and call me an idiot, it is not okay for me to take out a gun and blow your head off. Mitigating, maybe, but not okay. It truly concerns me how many people seem to think that this behavior is okay/warranted in the situation. Yes, he was provoked. It doesn't mean that gives him the right to nearly beat an unarmed female to death.
And btw, he's going to have a hell of a hard time claiming self-defense, given that she's much smaller than him and had no weapon. But yeah, slapping him and getting up in his face totally warrants a vicious beating with a deadly weapon while co-workers try to pry him off and other customers are screaming, panicking, and calling the cops. Totally sounds like he's the victim here.
Also, this is the first time on a serious issue that I've been able to do this, silly threads do not count.TheDarkestDerp said:Funny how people seem to find themselves somehow capable of determining what is "deserved" in situations like this. "This is overkill" "this is excessive" ...*shrugs* Whatever... I'm not one to determine what was "called for".
What I do know is this; if you're going to strike another human being, a stranger, whom you have no earthly idea if that person is Mr Wizard's Mild-mannered clone or an escaped mental patient with a boxblade and a thirst for human organs, you opened your own can of worms, fucking deal with the consequences, crybaby. Didn't want to get beaten down with a 'metal rod', probably shouldn't have assaulted the poor shmuck working at McDonalds in the first place. Be glad he didn't have a gun you damn idiots.
Dude, calm down.Gasaraki said:Really, guys? Slapping someone means you deserve to get beaten with a metal rod?
Go fuck yourselves.
I'm pretty damn sure that if they're attacking a coworker, you're allowed to restrain the customer. If not, too bad, they should be doing it anyways.RaikuFA said:yes they can, youre not allowed to even look a customer in the eye without their permission lest you get a beatdown for making the customer madmaddawg IAJI said:They wouldn't get fired for touching a customer if she is acting hostile towards themRaikuFA said:and what have the coworkers get fired over it? you know theyd get fired for even touching her
I just love how you rationalize the situation from your own perspective.jpoon said:Yeah, you're so obviously right. Now that I think about it the only way he could have handled that situation was to beat the women mercilessly with a metal stick, it was so obvious I don't know how I missed it. Give this guy a raise, not jail time!Darius Brogan said:Yes, blame the mentally unstable guy with anger issues that two stunned cunts penned him behind the counter and tried to assault him verbally and physically because they had a counterfeit $50 in their purse.jpoon said:Damn, that moron is obviously right back where he should be (in jail). Looks like McDumpster's was a bit too stressful for that guy.
That makes so much sense.
Whatever pal, rationalize the looney's attack all you want. I'm just saying, he's getting what he deserves...another long vacation from the real worldDarius Brogan said:I just love how you rationalize the situation from your own perspective.jpoon said:Yeah, you're so obviously right. Now that I think about it the only way he could have handled that situation was to beat the women mercilessly with a metal stick, it was so obvious I don't know how I missed it. Give this guy a raise, not jail time!Darius Brogan said:Yes, blame the mentally unstable guy with anger issues that two stunned cunts penned him behind the counter and tried to assault him verbally and physically because they had a counterfeit $50 in their purse.jpoon said:Damn, that moron is obviously right back where he should be (in jail). Looks like McDumpster's was a bit too stressful for that guy.
That makes so much sense.
He's MENTALLY UNSTABLE. You can't say 'he could have acted this way' simply because his brain doesn't work that way.
If you want to hold ignorant, self-righteous opinions, at least try to form them in a NON-personalized way. That way, at least, you're justifiably self-righteous.
and get arrested and fired?maddawg IAJI said:I'm pretty damn sure that if they're attacking a coworker, you're allowed to restrain the customer. If not, too bad, they should be doing it anyways.RaikuFA said:yes they can, youre not allowed to even look a customer in the eye without their permission lest you get a beatdown for making the customer madmaddawg IAJI said:They wouldn't get fired for touching a customer if she is acting hostile towards themRaikuFA said:and what have the coworkers get fired over it? you know theyd get fired for even touching her
EDIT: Computer delay, deleting post.jpoon said:Yeah, you're so obviously right. Now that I think about it the only way he could have handled that situation was to beat the women mercilessly with a metal stick, it was so obvious I don't know how I missed it. Give this guy a raise, not jail time!Darius Brogan said:Yes, blame the mentally unstable guy with anger issues that two stunned cunts penned him behind the counter and tried to assault him verbally and physically because they had a counterfeit $50 in their purse.jpoon said:Damn, that moron is obviously right back where he should be (in jail). Looks like McDumpster's was a bit too stressful for that guy.
That makes so much sense.
He should be in an institution, getting help with his obvious mental issues, not in prison, making them FAR worse than they are now.jpoon said:Whatever pal, rationalize the looney's attack all you want. I'm just saying, he's getting what he deserves...another long vacation from the real worldDarius Brogan said:I just love how you rationalize the situation from your own perspective.jpoon said:Yeah, you're so obviously right. Now that I think about it the only way he could have handled that situation was to beat the women mercilessly with a metal stick, it was so obvious I don't know how I missed it. Give this guy a raise, not jail time!Darius Brogan said:Yes, blame the mentally unstable guy with anger issues that two stunned cunts penned him behind the counter and tried to assault him verbally and physically because they had a counterfeit $50 in their purse.jpoon said:Damn, that moron is obviously right back where he should be (in jail). Looks like McDumpster's was a bit too stressful for that guy.
That makes so much sense.
He's MENTALLY UNSTABLE. You can't say 'he could have acted this way' simply because his brain doesn't work that way.
If you want to hold ignorant, self-righteous opinions, at least try to form them in a NON-personalized way. That way, at least, you're justifiably self-righteous.
Surely they'll be looking into institutionalizing him quite aggressively this time, being that this isn't his first horribly violent offense.Darius Brogan said:He should be in an institution, getting help with his obvious mental issues, not in prison, making them FAR worse than they are now.jpoon said:Whatever pal, rationalize the looney's attack all you want. I'm just saying, he's getting what he deserves...another long vacation from the real worldDarius Brogan said:I just love how you rationalize the situation from your own perspective.jpoon said:Yeah, you're so obviously right. Now that I think about it the only way he could have handled that situation was to beat the women mercilessly with a metal stick, it was so obvious I don't know how I missed it. Give this guy a raise, not jail time!Darius Brogan said:Yes, blame the mentally unstable guy with anger issues that two stunned cunts penned him behind the counter and tried to assault him verbally and physically because they had a counterfeit $50 in their purse.jpoon said:Damn, that moron is obviously right back where he should be (in jail). Looks like McDumpster's was a bit too stressful for that guy.
That makes so much sense.
He's MENTALLY UNSTABLE. You can't say 'he could have acted this way' simply because his brain doesn't work that way.
If you want to hold ignorant, self-righteous opinions, at least try to form them in a NON-personalized way. That way, at least, you're justifiably self-righteous.
Okay, I'm calling bullshit arrested part. I may not know retail, but I know law and restraining a dangerous individual is not against the law.RaikuFA said:and get arrested and fired?maddawg IAJI said:I'm pretty damn sure that if they're attacking a coworker, you're allowed to restrain the customer. If not, too bad, they should be doing it anyways.RaikuFA said:yes they can, youre not allowed to even look a customer in the eye without their permission lest you get a beatdown for making the customer madmaddawg IAJI said:They wouldn't get fired for touching a customer if she is acting hostile towards themRaikuFA said:and what have the coworkers get fired over it? you know theyd get fired for even touching her
i dont think you know retail
And you think he should be put in prison, with the key thrown far, far away, letting him absorb the violent atmosphere that EVERY prison on the planet produces, in the hopes that he will, somehow, come out of it rehabilitated?jpoon said:Surely they'll be looking into institutionalizing him quite aggressively this time, being that this isn't his first horribly violent offense.Darius Brogan said:He should be in an institution, getting help with his obvious mental issues, not in prison, making them FAR worse than they are now.jpoon said:Whatever pal, rationalize the looney's attack all you want. I'm just saying, he's getting what he deserves...another long vacation from the real worldDarius Brogan said:I just love how you rationalize the situation from your own perspective.jpoon said:Yeah, you're so obviously right. Now that I think about it the only way he could have handled that situation was to beat the women mercilessly with a metal stick, it was so obvious I don't know how I missed it. Give this guy a raise, not jail time!Darius Brogan said:Yes, blame the mentally unstable guy with anger issues that two stunned cunts penned him behind the counter and tried to assault him verbally and physically because they had a counterfeit $50 in their purse.jpoon said:Damn, that moron is obviously right back where he should be (in jail). Looks like McDumpster's was a bit too stressful for that guy.
That makes so much sense.
He's MENTALLY UNSTABLE. You can't say 'he could have acted this way' simply because his brain doesn't work that way.
If you want to hold ignorant, self-righteous opinions, at least try to form them in a NON-personalized way. That way, at least, you're justifiably self-righteous.
Are we watching a different video?Lolth17 said:And btw, he's going to have a hell of a hard time claiming self-defense, given that she's much smaller than him and had no weapon. But yeah, slapping him and getting up in his face totally warrants a vicious beating with a deadly weapon while co-workers try to pry him off and other customers are screaming, panicking, and calling the cops. Totally sounds like he's the victim here.