Microsoft Not Jumping on the HD Remake Bandwagon

Recommended Videos

Arehexes

New member
Jun 27, 2008
1,141
0
0
Can we at least have the metal gear HD remake cause I want to play peace walker but not on a bloody psp
 

vivster

New member
Oct 16, 2010
430
0
0
they are too young for the bandwagon anyway...
i mean there isn't really much they could bring back
might be good for them... or might be bad because they are losing out on more money and games in their portfolio
 

L34dP1LL

New member
Mar 6, 2010
195
0
0
TitanAtlas said:
Yeah the only HD they did, they ended ruining the game... Conker bad fur day... and in theyre ignorence after ruining the game they decided to cancel the long-awaited sequel....

Microsoft and EA and on the top of my list of: Most retard, greedy, "gaming" company in the world...
What about nintendo and their complete lack of new IP's?
 

Vyress

New member
Jul 12, 2010
87
0
0
Artemis923 said:
Logan Westbrook said:
Konami, for example, is bringing the Metal Gear Solid collection and the Zone of the Enders collection to the console.
This is FAR more mouth watering than any Halo remake could ever be.
Hell yeah! owo

You know the underlined part is like the REAL news in the whole article. xD
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,804
0
0
Well, they don't have any IPs beside Halo, so I'm not surprised...
 

diggy140892

New member
Jun 4, 2010
110
0
0
drakythe said:
The Wykydtron said:
[HEADING=1]Hold it![/HEADING]

Didn't the HD remake of Beyond Good and Evil just come out on 360? I'm sure that could be seen as jumping on the bandwagon if you were so inclined...

Anyway nitpicking aside, i don't have anything against HD remakes. As long as they don't stop devs from making something more original that is
Thats not an Xbox exclusive, as I can snag it on PSN too. Ergo not microsoft jumping on the bandwagon, just everyone else.

Oh, but I do call Shenanigans. Halo 2 will get remade if Halo: AE sells well. Like they wouldn't embrace their cash cow in a reborn form? (neverminding 4, 5, and 6, since those could still tank, theoretically)
HD Remake of Perfect Dark was an Xbox exclusive.
 

Harry Mason

New member
Mar 7, 2011
617
0
0
Like I needed another reason to dislike Microsoft...
The HD collections coming out on PS3 are so indescribably awesome. Cheap too.

Still pretty worried about "rerecorded voice acting" on the Silent Hill Collection, though. Maybe it will turn out OK.
 

Harry Mason

New member
Mar 7, 2011
617
0
0
OutrageousEmu said:
Harry Mason said:
Like I needed another reason to dislike Microsoft...
The HD collections coming out on PS3 are so indescribably awesome. Cheap too.

Still pretty worried about "rerecorded voice acting" on the Silent Hill Collection, though. Maybe it will turn out OK.
I heard they're including the original characters VA's on the disc. You can essentially switch whenever you want, like the Japanese and English language option on a lot of games.
Wait, REALLY?!

If this is true, you have made me a very happy geek today!
Seriously, do I actually have a reason to be happy about a Silent Hill release after all these years!?

...I may cry.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,951
0
0
Whats startling to me is the notion we need to remake games that are just 10 years old because we think the graphics dont hold up.

I mean if anything needs a boost it would be the generation before, when 3d graphics were first emerging and everything looked like they were made out of blocks.

Seriously, compare Cloud from FF7 or Link from Ocarina to say, Revan from KoToR or Master Chief and tell me who is in more need of a graphical overhaul.

And specifically on Halo... the graphics never were top of the line or even that visually distant. So really this almost seems like a waste.

HOWEVER! its not a waste, because well, with this incarnation your getting an opportunity to play the original halo multiplayer with proper modern matchmaking systems already in place. On that point I can agree that this is not all together a bad idea.
 

MetalDooley

Cwipes!!!
Feb 9, 2010
2,054
0
1
Country
Ireland
AyreonMaiden said:
I don't get this anti-remake/rerelease attitude gamers have. Would you say there's no need to reprint classic novels, too? How about digitally releasing music that was once only available on vinyl from the olden days and sounded like ten asses being scratched by eleven hands? Why do we need to struggle to experience our fondest memories?

Bring on more rereleases. Take full advantage of whatever you want, be it the digital platforms or remaking and reimagining entire games. Not every new game should be a remake, but I'll never complain when they're announced. If we're "art" now, that must mean we have "classics" that future generations (and older ones that keep up with the times) deserve to experience without digging around for busted old consoles, or carts with dead batteries, or handhelds with no backlights, or RF switches, or any of that needless struggle.
Reprinting classic novels is easy though.They just print the original text and perhaps give it a fancy new cover.Similarly releasing music digitally isn't that difficult as all they need to do is maybe clean up the sound.Remakes of games do take a lot of time,effort and resources however and that's what people are objecting to because that time,effort and resources could be better spent creating new games

I have no problem with re-releasing classic games but why not just re-release them in their original state such as on Wii's VC service.If the game was good enough back in the day then it should be good enough now without the need for a fancy HD makeover.I still regularly play NES,SNES,MegaDrive and N64 games and they're just as enjoyable now as they were originally

The gaming world is unique in that like books,movies and music we expect our classics to be re-released but we also expect,nay demand,that these classics be completely overhauled first.Why is this?How come you don't hear film buffs demanding that,say,Citizen Kane be remade with fancy CGI effects or literature fans demanding that the works of Jane Austen be updated into modern english?
 

Dexiro

New member
Dec 23, 2009
2,974
0
0
FlyAwayAutumn said:
Good.

While I like the idea of my favorite games getting better graphics. Giving me the chance to buy them and relive the glory days. It's still a waste of time and money. For example, I have Halo and can go back and play it whenever the hell I want. So why would I need an updated version? That won't stop me from buying this HD remake of Halo. But it also doesn't mean it isn't a waste of time.
It's not a waste of time if people would buy it, whether it's a waste of time or not isn't based off your purchase alone.

Halo I couldn't see working in HD but that's just my opinion, their are other games that would though I'm sure. I'm more of a playstation guy so I don't know the Xbox library that well, but the remake thing for the PS3 is working out awesomely ~
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
AyreonMaiden said:
If we're "art" now, that must mean we have "classics" that future generations (and older ones that keep up with the times) deserve to experience without digging around for busted old consoles, or carts with dead batteries, or handhelds with no backlights, or RF switches, or any of that needless struggle.
Except there is no struggle there. PCs easily take the role of any obsolete console, plus the older games are often ported to newer gaming platforms. Gaming is not technologically exclusive.

As for remakes, the entire thing feels more exploitative than progressive. They're not remaking the game to introduce it to a new younger generation, they are doing so to further milk cash from their existing player base. I've never seen literature fans express such idiotic zeal over reprints of books, but perhaps I'm not looking hard enough.
 

TitanAtlas

New member
Oct 14, 2010
802
0
0
L34dP1LL said:
TitanAtlas said:
Yeah the only HD they did, they ended ruining the game... Conker bad fur day... and in theyre ignorence after ruining the game they decided to cancel the long-awaited sequel....

Microsoft and EA and on the top of my list of: Most retard, greedy, "gaming" company in the world...
What about nintendo and their complete lack of new IP's?
Nintendo at least delivers good games, because tey wait to perfect the product... they do not rush everything to make "big bucks" has EA or Microsoft...

Nintendo prefers quality over quantity, and theyre right... so no... im sorry nintendo is not on my list of corrupt, retard, greedy "gaming" company...
 

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
713
0
0
I'd only dig this news if the game is multi-platform.
Heck even the HD remake of Zone of enders is multiplatform.
 

AyreonMaiden

New member
Sep 24, 2010
601
0
0
MetalDooley said:
Reprinting classic novels is easy though.They just print the original text and perhaps give it a fancy new cover.Similarly releasing music digitally isn't that difficult as all they need to do is maybe clean up the sound.Remakes of games do take a lot of time,effort and resources however and that's what people are objecting to because that time,effort and resources could be better spent creating new games

I have no problem with re-releasing classic games but why not just re-release them in their original state such as on Wii's VC service.If the game was good enough back in the day then it should be good enough now without the need for a fancy HD makeover.I still regularly play NES,SNES,MegaDrive and N64 games and they're just as enjoyable now as they were originally

The gaming world is unique in that like books,movies and music we expect our classics to be re-released but we also expect,nay demand,that these classics be completely overhauled first.Why is this?How come you don't hear film buffs demanding that,say,Citizen Kane be remade with fancy CGI effects or literature fans demanding that the works of Jane Austen be updated into modern english?
That's a very good point. Another fair comparison would be what George Lucas has been doing to the Star Wars films...

I should rephrase. Bring on every rerelease and port you want, but bring remakes on only if the original option remains available. I can't lie, I loved Twin Snakes over the original. Infinitely easier to control while retaining the challenge, much easier on the eyes...in every single last way. Sorry, but Mei Ling's accent isn't a huge deal to me.

If say, MGS: Twin Snakes were the only version of MGS available in the market because Kojima is trying to phase out his original work in favor of the new, THAT would suck...but if you have a PS3 with Emotion Engine, or Playstation Store, you can get the original as it was and comfortably ignore the remake.

The upcoming Halo Anniversary, from what I gather, has the entire original game as an option within its disc as well, AND Xbox 360s are backwards compatible with the original, AND you can buy it digitally from Xbox Live too. So I'm not really seeing the problem with having it all ways so that all players can enjoy in their own way.

DeadlyYellow said:
Except there is no struggle there. PCs easily take the role of any obsolete console, plus the older games are often ported to newer gaming platforms. Gaming is not technologically exclusive.

As for remakes, the entire thing feels more exploitative than progressive. They're not remaking the game to introduce it to a new younger generation, they are doing so to further milk cash from their existing player base. I've never seen literature fans express such idiotic zeal over reprints of books, but perhaps I'm not looking hard enough.
Too right you are about PCs taking on that role, which is why I'm never against emulation. I think the biggest issue with that is when it comes to more and more modern "obsolete" consoles. There's people out there that simply don't upgrade until it's absolutely necessary because all their PCs are for is internet, storing of files and documents, and work. And to do that, you're at the barest of minimums regarding requirements. I don't often think of upgrading my PC since I only have a netbook, so I can only comfortably emulate up to the 16 bit era.

I hate the "milking" argument. Yeah, It's milking but so's every new game that milks what's currently popular. Journey and Limbo milk their artstyles because it's a cost effective way to make something halfway pretty in a popular style. I guarantee it's not 100% because ARTISTIC VISION.

What's wrong with making and saving money using what's already popular so you can stay afloat? Devs need money for those new games people want to see so badly, so I think anything short of outright theft of someone else's money is fair game.

I should add also, that we're in no way in a place where there are more remakes and ports than there are either original games or sequels. I mean, show of hands, how many people knew a game called Sniper: Ghost Warrior came out recently? And if you don't get the Atlus Faithful newsletter, chances are you missed out on info for My World, My Way, and Master of the Monster Lair, and Class of Heroes...etc.

Like with everything, we don't see what isn't marketed directly in front of our faces and, again like with everything else, there's no telling what the quality of the games will be. People are out there making original things...but your mileage will definitely vary, and that simply has nothing to do with how many remakes and ports there are out there.
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,367
0
0
People, if you really want HD remakes of games, don't fret.

What somebody says and what their intent is often is not the same.

For example, Warner Brothers saying that their will be a Green Lantern sequel...
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,450
0
0
oh also Silent Hill (2 and 3) are getting HD remakes

Donnyp said:
Once someone says MONEY! they will jump on that bandwagon.
lol yeah I was gonna say, "but Microsoft, isn't it good business??"
 

imnot

New member
Apr 23, 2010
3,914
0
0
voorhees123 said:
Who would buy this? I would have thought people had played Halo 1 to death many times by now. Especially not worth buying just for HD version. Unless they add extra stuff to it? What you think, maybe demo or trailers of new Halo games?
I think they said it has some extra maps for Reach and firefight, but I could be wrong.
 
Oct 2, 2010
282
0
0
viranimus said:
HOWEVER! its not a waste, because well, with this incarnation your getting an opportunity to play the original halo multiplayer with proper modern matchmaking systems already in place. On that point I can agree that this is not all together a bad idea.
Actually, you're not. Halo: Anniversary's multiplayer is effectively a 7-map DLC pack for Reach.

343i has announced that they're working on a title update which will hopefully help make the classic playlist suck less than the current one, though they haven't discussed much specifics of it.