We'll have to agree to disagree on this, but just think about this: Somewhere, someone (not me) is just as adamant about this subject with a view that is contradictory to yours, and thinks their logic is just as infallible as yours. One of you is "wrong". And just as easily as you would scoff at this and be positive he is the one who is wrong, they are just as positive it is you.EverythingIncredible said:If people hold another kind of evidence above empirical ones then they are definitely wrong.ianrocks6495 said:Yep and some people hold biblical evidence or personal experience higher than scientific evidence and weigh it more in their decisions. While in this age it is true most hold empirical evidence as the truth, its not universal. The value of evidence depends on the person. While to you and me it may be more truthful or factual, to others it's not. It's not necessarily closer to the concept of universal "truth" or "fact" than any other type of evidence.
Empirical evidence is, by definition, the most solid and factual kind of evidence that can quite literally not be wrong.
There is no evidence stronger than that. If people still hold other kinds above that, then yeah. They are wrong.
That's strictly speaking not true. The only difference between a post op male to female transexual would be the genes (x and a y instead of double x), but genes don't dictate gender, the body does. Genes are a set of instructions for bodily construction, but a baby isn't male or female until it's done being constructed.. Changing someone's gene for eye color for example wouldn't magically change the eye color, the body would have to acknowledge the change and make new pigment.redspud said:Technically they aren't.
Seriously, no. For 99% of the drivers they either work out of the box or you use the package manager to install it. Compare that to windows, where you have to dig through the internet for appropriate drivers, especially if you want to use your good ol' printer for the new spiffy win7 pc you just bought at wallmart.zephae said:I hate it too, but you have to admit there is significant truth to that. My #1 complaint about Linux is the lack of intuative GUI's for things like installing drivers instead of having to use the terminal (I was also wary of the Package Manager for a while). And the fact that the OS is completely open and allows you to majorly fuck shit up means that you have to be careful and pay attention and most people aren't. They just want to be lazy and call tech support. Personally, I love the satisfaction of accomplishing those tasks myself and that nearly every problem I have can be answered with 30mins to an hour, some Googling, and forum browsing, but I can see why that wouldn't be appealing.
Edit: Also, I blame marketers for the gaming problems. It makes no sense to me why you would intentionally lock yourself out from a significant market and as more OS options become available I think the decisions not to make things compatible with Linux will look really silly. Ubuntu is getting easier to use every update and if they could make more of the basic functions more user-friendly I think you'd see a lot of people skip the multi-hundred dollar OS. Oh, and also make WINE work more like Play-On-Linux.
This has not been my experience with the OS. Both for my graphics card (nvidia GeForce 8800 GT) and audio card (Creative Audigy 2) I have had to scour the internet for community-made drivers that were not available in the package manager (this was not done recently, it was a couple years ago, but I don't think Creative's seeming contempt for Linux has thawed). Windows does have the issue of updating drivers, but in my experience the large market share they claim has made the drivers relatively easy to find and install except for printers. Software in general on Linux hasn't been that hard though, I'll concede.Whoracle said:Seriously, no. For 99% of the drivers they either work out of the box or you use the package manager to install it. Compare that to windows, where you have to dig through the internet for appropriate drivers, especially if you want to use your good ol' printer for the new spiffy win7 pc you just bought at wallmart.
Same goes for software.
Command line hacking just does not happen anymore, at least not involuntary, and at least not on the major distributions
From what I can remember, it's a solid, and the misconception might have risen from a certain scientist noting that the molecules (atoms?) in glass were arranged seemingly randomly like in a liquid, coupled with people noticing that some old glass windows were thicker at the bottom.Meatramen said:Without going onto wikipedia do you know what it is and not just what it isn't?Jonluw said:That glass is a liquid.
There are many more that bug me, but this one...
No, just no...![]()
It's something that comes up in papers and such a lot. I can't give you any one thing, sorry. I'm sure there are rapists who do it just for the sex, but honestly, if someone just wants sex, there ARE easy women and prostitutes to go to. The fear a rapist instill in a woman when they force her gives the rapist a sense of power and control, which is what they want.Father Time said:I've heard this a bunch of times but I have a hard time believing that there aren't rapists who do it purely for sex. Where did you hear this idea from?solemnwar said:Might of been said already, but I don't feel like reading 7 pages to see if it has, so here we go:
That rape is about sex. It's not. It's about power, control, fear. Sex is just a "bonus". But everyone fixates on the sex part.
Not to argue with you, but there are people who make both misconceptions true... And they are usually the ones who end up famous =/OrenjiJusu said:The misconception that all americans have less IQ than a used yoghurt and that all british people are incredibly upper class and only drink tea and eat scones.
Not to argue with you, but there are people who make both misconceptions true... And they are usually the ones who end up famous =/OrenjiJusu said:The misconception that all americans have less IQ than a used yoghurt and that all british people are incredibly upper class and only drink tea and eat scones.
Only 4 months? Where you live, Spain? Where i come from, we only have about 4 months of summer...H31neken said:But... why wouldn't you?Ice Azure said:That us people who live in Hawaii all live in grass shacks on the beach, don't wear clothes, and have no electricity. We're civilized like you people in the mainland, dumbasses...
And yes, I've actually had someone ask me that before.
Not permanently, obviously, but living like that for a few weeks at a time sounds pretty awesome, given the fact that your climate is nothing short of awesome. Unlike the climate here where we get FOUR SODDING MONTHS OF WINTER with a crapload of snow, and temperatures that range from a mild -2C or so to -30C.
That bugs me too. Whenever someone says "I could care less", I go "...Uh...so...that implies that you DO care."TheRightToArmBears said:That the phrase 'I could care less' is just what stupid people say when they mean 'I couldn't care less'. 'I could care less' implies that you care very little, but you probably could care a bit less. It's a bit like sarcasm, it's difficult to get across via writing.