To me it sounds like her bandwagoning on a current issue supported by the administration. A lot of what she is saying is parroting comments by Barack Obama.
Understand that unless she's outed as a Lesbian or something (referance to an older issue which caused problems for another winner if I remember), being Miss America is about more than the pageant itself. The person with that title spends a year travelling around and speaking on differant events and such. By jumping on this issue it makes her a potential commodity for those people currently in power. If she was say to SUPPORT video games, the odds of the goverment using her as an envoy or something reduce dramatically, and in general I can't think of the video game industry ever having tried to recruit a Miss America or similar celebrity (which is a bit differant than being a model or porn star) as a spokesperson.
At any rate, it doesn't surprise me. On a certain level I actually AGREE with the central issue of physical fitness. I do not however think video games are the culprit, rather I think it's society as a whole. Even if there were no video games of any sort, kids STILL wouldn't be going outside to play like they used to. With both parents working adult supervision is a problem. The cost of all our freedoms is plenty of street crime with criminals, perverts, and whack jobs able to run around everywhere more or less freely because the requirements to take someone off the street are pretty high. Children wind up missing doing simple things like walking home from school every day. Not to mention the fact that many communities have passed laws that prohibit children from walking the streets unattended (pretty much the evolution of the old man screaming for kids to get off his lawn).
I'd question this lady's claims, and if they are true she had a rare and special oppertunity, and probably got very lucky besides.
Video Games are little more than the latest in a long line of scapegoats for the current problems with youth. Comics, Rock Music, and other things have been blamed through the years just as vehemently. In reality such scapegoats exist because the big problems are hard to deal with.
Let me put it this way, let's say you want to make your neighborhood safer for kids to wander around in, so they can have something resembling the Norman Rockwell ideal childhood. With a safer neighborhood, things like adult supervision become less of an issue.
Well, then it comes down to the fact that all of these wierdos have rights, and all of a sudden the same democrats and liberals doing the whining will get all up in arms as soon as you start trying to create standards that cause people to get arrested or infringe on their freedoms. Oh sure, some guy might be a wierd child perv, but unless you can actually PROVE he has kiddie porn or has attacked a child, you can't do anything about him. Try and enforce it so that kids can come and play on the blacktop instead of young adults hanging around gambling and selling drugs while they shoot hoops, and next thing you know you've got all kinds of people screaming about public space, or depending on the situation maybe even racism. That due who hangs out on the street corner or whatever, that everyone knows sells crack, is still there because under our laws knowing is not enough you have to be able to prove it, and that can be difficult to do given all the rules, loopholes, and ways even a dullard can make it difficult to be caught in a legal sense.
Address that kind of issue, among others, and you make a differance. Nobody will though because it's too big, and too ambigious. Video Games are small, aren't going to fight back, and don't cause legal and moral contridictions. After all when you deal with a liberal who fought for all those civil liberties, trying to get him to admit he made a mistake when the results are kids not being able to safely walk the streets in most places can be VERY difficult. Most would prefer to just avoid the whole thing... and truthfully video games are a good scapegoat for both parties.