Oh noes! America! It's unpatriotic!Chipperz said:They wouldn't care. If it isn't happening to America, they don't care.poncho14 said:What would he say if it was say, London burning or other big european countrys.
Andrew Heining can fuck off. I'm sick of this "IT CAN'T HAPPEN TO AMERICA!" bullshit. Just to make it perfectly clear, he has pointed out he'd be fine if it happened in Eastern Europe. Because that is far away. And because Eastern Europeans aren't allowed to think the same back. Because that would make them terrorists.
It would seem that it's perfectly fine when we people from east Europe (actually south-east in my case) die, we obviously spend all day killing each other all the time anyway (sarcasm). As long as it doesn't happen in the US.kleft101 said:People like that annoy me so much, the arrogance of what he is saying, its ok for it to be happening in an Eastern European country but not Washington D.C.!?
Depends. If it's set during the Bush administration then it's the same thing"In the upcoming Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2... the gallant mansion reduced to rubble doesn't belong to some crazed separatist dictator hellbent on all kinds of nefarious acts. Instead, it's the White House,"
both of those were prevented in the game though by the players actions. So I think because you protect them the CSM sees that as heroic? CSm is often a little extreme on their views about just about everything.cyber_andyy said:What about nuking Seattle or Air striking the Statue of liberty in WiC.
Bandwagon much?
With guys going around saying that depicting an invasion of Washington D.C. is a step too far... Well, it's more likely than I think some Americans would like to admit.Ph33nix said:I don;t think it is wrong to set it in a Washington DC that is being blown apart. I mean we have played games where Berlin and Baghdad are being blown apart in near photo-realism this is just another city to check off the list of photo realistic capitals to fight in.
I also think though that this will hurt Modern Warfare 2. The previous Modern Warfare game was praised for its realistic story that felt like it could really happen, But someone invading Washington DC? that just seams unrealistic and unlikely.
lol one time I did that as the allies in re2 that was so much fun. the destroying the monuments thing. actually i think i got a couple of them 3 times in one campaign...Amnestic said:Dunno what they're on about. I burned the Whitehouse in Red Alert 2, I slaughtered hundreds of American soldiers. I even kidnapped and mind controlled the President. In fact, I burned pretty much every famous DC landmark. Washington Monument? Rubble. Lincoln Memorial? Trashed. Smithsonian Museum? Little more than dust in the wind of a nuclear explosion that rocked the city.
Also, as someone above said: Why is it okay for books and films to describe crazy 'traumatic' events with the incineration of our cities but when a game does it, suddenly it's 'striking'?
Sorry Mr. CSM, I think you're talking a load of codswallop.
They probably completely ignored Hellgate London, seeing as it's not in the USqwerty15990 said:if they are complaining about this i would hate to see what they said about hellgate london
well someone getting a foot hold in DC is pretty unlike considering the major bases near DC.Chipperz said:With guys going around saying that depicting an invasion of Washington D.C. is a step too far... Well, it's more likely than I think some Americans would like to admit.Ph33nix said:I don;t think it is wrong to set it in a Washington DC that is being blown apart. I mean we have played games where Berlin and Baghdad are being blown apart in near photo-realism this is just another city to check off the list of photo realistic capitals to fight in.
I also think though that this will hurt Modern Warfare 2. The previous Modern Warfare game was praised for its realistic story that felt like it could really happen, But someone invading Washington DC? that just seams unrealistic and unlikely.
He probably thinks every city and town over there looks like Prypiat. What a poor, misguided loon.Hardcore_gamer said:Why did he have to mention Eastern Europe? Why not just mention a fictional town? Why does it have to be a fictional Eastern European town? Is it ok to blow up Eastern Europeans but not Americans because Eastern Europeans are primitive and thus it's ok to blow them to hell?
His comment is full of shit.
Hmm. I wonder if gassing the bases in a sneak attack might work. You know, like in the video.Ph33nix said:well someone getting a foot hold in DC is pretty unlike considering the major bases near DC.Chipperz said:With guys going around saying that depicting an invasion of Washington D.C. is a step too far... Well, it's more likely than I think some Americans would like to admit.Ph33nix said:I don;t think it is wrong to set it in a Washington DC that is being blown apart. I mean we have played games where Berlin and Baghdad are being blown apart in near photo-realism this is just another city to check off the list of photo realistic capitals to fight in.
I also think though that this will hurt Modern Warfare 2. The previous Modern Warfare game was praised for its realistic story that felt like it could really happen, But someone invading Washington DC? that just seams unrealistic and unlikely.