Molyneux: Fable 3 Will Upset Some People
- Thread starter Logan Westbrook
- Start date
Well if anybody leads the industry in expert skill at pissing of and alienating the gamer demographic it's Peter Molyneux.
I always loved how condescending his interviews were for Fable 2. It's like he just wanted to go ahead and come out and say "I think you all are a bunch of stereotypical losers" (via the whole I will give them the chance to know what love feels like speech).
Of all the people in the game industry I'd like to cage fight, it's Peter Molyneux at the top.
I always loved how condescending his interviews were for Fable 2. It's like he just wanted to go ahead and come out and say "I think you all are a bunch of stereotypical losers" (via the whole I will give them the chance to know what love feels like speech).
Of all the people in the game industry I'd like to cage fight, it's Peter Molyneux at the top.
I know something about Fable 3 that would piss me off. We get to the ending, beat the final boss (or just shoot some guy off a tower again) we wait through the credits and then a message pops up. "TO BE CONTINUED IN FABLE 4."
The thought of a fourth game. -shudders-
The thought of a fourth game. -shudders-
People will be very upset if they make the game actually good. Nobody would have anything to complain about and man would I be pissed.
Definitely the Natal thing. It has to be. What else would cause Peter (remember who we're talking about here) to admit fans will be disappointed?
Not that I care. I support Natal fully.
Not that I care. I support Natal fully.
I just put it though the Peter Molyneux translator and it says..
" There might be a small feature that will slightly annoy a small minority of gamers. "
- jokes aside, I think If fable 3 uses Natal, things will be interesting. Peter Molyneux is one of the few innovators out there that experiment with game-play. ( Well I honestly thing Loin Heart Studios should take all most of the credit )
" There might be a small feature that will slightly annoy a small minority of gamers. "
- jokes aside, I think If fable 3 uses Natal, things will be interesting. Peter Molyneux is one of the few innovators out there that experiment with game-play. ( Well I honestly thing Loin Heart Studios should take all most of the credit )
Maybe Fable 3 would have features that upset NO ONE. I mean, when does Molyneux's games live up to his hype.
I'm going to laugh if "Super pissed off" is an understatement and he actually causes the apocalypse with this game somehow....Well then again I doubt I'd laugh for very long because I don't think I could survive all that well in an apocalypse fueled by angry gamers for very long.
Meh. About the only thing upsetting will be that Fable 3 actually being good instead of mediocre. Unfortunately, it will be like every other western rpg with its faux choices.
Well, maybe this is a new marketing device, instead of hyping it up, he's hyping it down. That way when it's out it'll be seen as awesome instead of disappointing.
Either that or it will involve Natal, in that case it'll suck, alot!
Either that or it will involve Natal, in that case it'll suck, alot!
Peter is retarded, Let me explain
Peter Is trying to create a game where you can decide what is moral, and what is not moral.
Peter does this under the retarded assumption that an objective morality exists that everyone shares. We both know, What I see as wrong isn't what you see as wrong. We can only infer upon what Peter's views of what is good and bad are and try to follow them. When you create a game that assumes objective morality exists, When it doesn't, It PISSES people off. I like his games. But trying to have a game where Good and Evil Choices are decided through someone else's point of view is entirely retarded.
Peter Is trying to create a game where you can decide what is moral, and what is not moral.
Peter does this under the retarded assumption that an objective morality exists that everyone shares. We both know, What I see as wrong isn't what you see as wrong. We can only infer upon what Peter's views of what is good and bad are and try to follow them. When you create a game that assumes objective morality exists, When it doesn't, It PISSES people off. I like his games. But trying to have a game where Good and Evil Choices are decided through someone else's point of view is entirely retarded.
"This just in, people super pissed off, Fable 3 is out and is sub-par."
Is it ironic that you've got a Timmeh avatar? I think it might just be...101194 said:
