I was going to talk about how this is counter productive because it only harms consumers and not pirates but since others have already done so here's another reason it's counter productive:
more or less what I see happening.Eleuthera said:Good idea, the three warnings we get at the moment never really managed to convince me... but this one will surely do the job...
Yes, the industry is exploitative, greedy and unethical. But it is not an invulnerable, faceless monolith. It is mostly made up of minimum wage workers and struggling artists - the first to feel the pinch when profits drop, the first victims of piracy, and the least deserving of your condemnation. They are the industry - not just some suits at the top.RJ Dalton said:The industry is an exploitative cabal of greedy fucks who take all the profit from the creative endeavors of others, file lawsuits against individuals worth millions of dollars for what amounts to petty larceny, use unethical business practices to avoid paying those who do the real work what they are owed and ultimately contribute nothing at all to society.maninahat said:Who are you referring to? The industry, the pirates or the consumers?RJ Dalton said:Forgive me if I personally feel that the people who are victims in this crime are harmful leeches on society who have no right to exist.
Pirates are selfish, entitled shits who pee in the pool, the industry are the ones who stick up signs telling people to stop it, and the consumers are the ones who suffer both the piss yellow water and the obnoxious signs. Consumers like to complain about the signs, whilst failing to realize that they should be moaning about the ones who pissed in the pool in the first place.
The people that piracy generally "hurts" are people who have no right to the money they lost on piracy anyway. I have no sympathy for them and never will.
Would you mind providing me with that evidence? I'd be very interested to see some of it. What's more, how does a ten-second-long warning breed piracy? Personally I don't think the average consumer stands there in the store going: "No, I want to buy this movie, but I won't because it will probably contain an anti-piracy message."Dandark said:Clearly this will solve piracy. However could I have not realized that the way to combat piracy is to do the very thing that can help breed piracy. Luckily we had the US goverment to ignore evidence and logic as they are so good at doing.
That analogy doesn't work that well. It implies that pirates are directly affecting the paying customers, when in fact all the problems for the paying customers comes form how the industry reacts to them.maninahat said:Who are you referring to? The industry, the pirates or the consumers?RJ Dalton said:Forgive me if I personally feel that the people who are victims in this crime are harmful leeches on society who have no right to exist.
Pirates are selfish, entitled shits who pee in the pool, the industry are the ones who stick up signs telling people to stop it, and the consumers are the ones who suffer both the piss yellow water and the obnoxious signs. Consumers like to complain about the signs, whilst failing to realize that they should be moaning about the ones who pissed in the pool in the first place.
Man up? You mean bend over.maninahat said:So I'm expecting the forum to be filled with people who are angry at this new inconvenience, whilst totally apathetic to piracy and utterly incapable of suggesting a way for the government to magically fix the problem.
Yes, it is annoying. But I'm willing to man up and accept that it is probably a necessary evil when there is no obvious solution to an endemic crime. Pointing out that this new warning will hardly solve piracy is not a good argument. You're saying that if one can't achieve a perfect result, there is no point in trying anything in the first place. That is not helpful.
Absolutely! There is nothing I can add to this but to avoid a low content post let me just say that indeed, piracy and used sales are used as scapegoats to do shit that people would not allow with any other product. Imagine your washing machine refusing to wash socks without an additional fee. Imagine your washing machine having a built in tv screen (that you don't want but is worked into the price) so it can display anti-used appliances propaganda and unskippable ads for new washers.Paradoxrifts said:Piracy isn't a problem. Instead it is an excuse, an excuse to for businesses to employ methods and practices to more tightly control and regulate what the average consumer can do with the technology at their disposal.
Technology that we supposedly own, media that we supposedly own, all of which are increasingly being sold as defective by design. We are sold physical media and told we only bought a license to what it contains. We are sold pieces of technology that have limitations built into them through both the construction of the device and the programming that allows it to function, despite there being no reason for it apart than the deliberate crippling or lobotomy benefits everyone, else, everyone other than the person who bought the device.
Alright, thesis activate. Show me your moves.Intellectual property rights theft is not a victimless crime.
Seems legit. Where's your evidence? ... None? Well, that's not very convincing, now, is it?It threatens U.S. businesses and robs hard-working Americans of their jobs, which negatively impacts the economy.
Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa. Wait. What? You're... you're kidding, right?It can also pose serious health and safety risks to consumers, and oftentimes, it fuels global organized crime.
what about this one?Andy Shandy said:As with every topic that comes up about these unskippable things, I feel obliged to post this image.
Anyway, do they not realise that people are annoyed by these and all these anti-piracy ads they have to wade through are more likely to make them pirate?
The reason Alan Wake didn't sell very much is that Microsoft forgot to reveal that more than half of the sales were through Xbox Live, so it did in fact sell pretty well. With the release on PC it managed to become profitable at release day. The number of people who pirated The Witcher was a random large number that was later proven false. The games that were pirated the most were in fact games that had DRMTizzytheTormentor said:Maybe if piracy wasn't so prevalent this wouldn't happen (wasn't Alan Wake pirated so much, the game was a commercial failure) and I thought the Witcher 2 was pirated 4 million times and the game itself sold 1 million (correct me if I'm wrong)
Yeah the piracy warnings suck, but it's only because they want to make money for what they worked on. Also relevant