That i dont see many people doing the "I disagree with what you say, but I'll fight to the death for your right to say it.". They just SHOUT VERY LOUD LIKE A BARKING CHIHUAHUA and expect the "dissagreing bastard" to just shut up at once.erttheking said:
But see, THIS is the reason why i think the Lok series failed to capture the essence of videogames. This was the perfect opportunity to interact with a world under the effects of predestination. You are tecnically with free will, but at the same time the world rearranges itself to make shit happen one way or another.Lunar Templar said:
What makes it more irritating is that the slump the series experienced from about 2002 to 2008/09-ish is greatly exaggerated. Did the series have a chronic case of the main series games having questionable quality ranging from mediocre to painful? Yes. But no one outside the fandom (hell even some people in it) seems to remember that during this six to seven year time period, five perfectly good handheld titles came who's quality ranged from good (Sonic Advence 2) to great (Sonic Advance 3/Rush). Both the Advance Trilogy and the two Rush titles were masterfully crafted successors to the Genesis Era Sonic games. The Advance Trilogy is a true successor to the classic games, and for all of it's posturing, the first Sonic Advance is far more worthy of the title Sonic the Hedgehog 4 than the game that actually bears that name will ever be. The two Rush games were a wonderful breath of fresh air for the series, revamping the classic gameplay with a modern touch to create a very addicting play style that had me coming back to my DS for months.Eric the Orange said:
The irony is quite thick here.JellySlimerMan said:
yeah, i could see that working, so long as story isn't sacrificed cause i've yet to lay a sand box game with a truly great story, and if there was one thing TLoK could use help with its game playJellySlimerMan said:
So I say that while defending you and now you're getting on my ass for it? Why do I feel like I turned over two pages at once?JellySlimerMan said:
Bleach has become a joke really. I thought it started out quite well and up to the end of Soul Society Arc was amazing, then it introduced Aizen as a villain and devolved into "we have a new level of power, here's a more powerful enemy, we must get stronger, we have a new level of power."bravetoaster said:
Timothy Dalton was the worst James Bond, I really wish those movies didn't count. The only thing worse than a Timothy Dalton James Bond movie was this hour long show that aired in the 60's that was a really shortened re-creation of Casino Royale with an American playing James Bond. It aired on one of those cheapie cable channels that runs nothing but old TV shows like The Lone Ranger and Bonanza and advertises stuff for old people.Devin Barker said:
Mnn.?? and why would you consider yourself a barking chihuahua?? you did the oposite with Bhalspawn actually. You actually argued your points. That its ok.erttheking said:
An "shouting argument" is one that makes people stop talking by just insulting them very loudly rather than consider the argument at hand. For a triumphant example, see Bhallspawn comments.Aardvaarkman said:
If i fuck up, i can to do it again until the message is clear. Its called learning from your mistakes, a concept that its alien to you (and the writers of ME3 apparently)
If i dont understand the "subtext" then you will have to tell me in detail. Or otherwise you are making shit up.
No because i said before that i was describing people who dont like to argue and prefer to shout, and i have demostrated that i WANT to argue with actions alone here on the comments.
Moore suited the more humourous, goofy era. "Best Bond" depends on what you look for in a Bond. I always thought Dalton was the closest to the Bond in the books, even more so than Craig, so he could be the best Bond for that reason. But for enjoyability, I'll always go with Connery, just for his sheer charm, audacity, and his ridiculously incompatible contemporary views.Woodsey said:
