MW3 no different than MW2....(some MW3 gameplay)
- Thread starter yuval152
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Another year rolls by, and another Call of Duty 4.x title rolls off the assembly line.
Same game, different paint job.
Face it folks; unless you're one of the many who line up year after year for their annual "push-button, take pellet" Call of Duty 4 supplements, you aren't part of the party; and your opinion means less than nothing.
That's how it worked for all the years Halo played pied-piper for the FPS genre; Call of Duty 4.x will continue to do the same.
Just look for alternatives and you'll be happier.
Same game, different paint job.
Face it folks; unless you're one of the many who line up year after year for their annual "push-button, take pellet" Call of Duty 4 supplements, you aren't part of the party; and your opinion means less than nothing.
That's how it worked for all the years Halo played pied-piper for the FPS genre; Call of Duty 4.x will continue to do the same.
Just look for alternatives and you'll be happier.
First, martyrdom made me laugh, so thanks for that. Second, I wasn't bashing Madden, I was giving an example of how one could make an argument that they're the same settings every year, compared to COD which are different.NameIsRobertPaulson said:
If you think it's worth paying for a new Madden game every year, that's cool. I wait until it hits the bargain bin before I buy Madden games, because they're not worth full price to me. I don't buy the DLC maps for COD for the same reason.
I personally can't justify buying a game that could easily be an expansion/content patch every year regardless of how fun it is. Though I've played Counter Strike for 8 years, the game that's been consistently played by many for 11-12 years.Radeonx said:
Ok. Why change the aspects of the game that aren't broken? The graphics and gun mechanics of the weapons essentially worked. Certain perks broke the game. Certain map bugs broke the game. The community itself broke the game (which is not a developers issue). They've reworked the perks, added some, taken some away. Same with the way they reward you in game. So what if it's an improved MW2 without OMA nooby tubeys. MW2 was pretty damn fun to play most times. Pretty frustrating other times. If you like the game, play it. If you prefer Battlefield, play that. If you prefer RTS, stick to Starcraft. Doesn't matter if it's improved on an older version, y'all probably upgrade your computer software and hardware too. No different. Why not?
somehow it actually looks worse, noob tubing is just as bad, UMP is just as bad, they still don't know what recoil is. So why do I think its worse rather than the same? Because they didnt fucking fix anything in 2 years. I might buy it when steam has an uber sale and I can get it super cheap so I can find out how the story ends.
You know what I would love to see... A COD thread on the escapist that doesn't end up becoming one giant excuse to hate on it even more.
All the hate imo seems to have become this:
"I hate on it because it makes me feel better."
Basically the old middle/elementary-school bully excuse.
All the hate imo seems to have become this:
"I hate on it because it makes me feel better."
Basically the old middle/elementary-school bully excuse.
This is nothing more then MW2 repackaged.
Activision knows that people will buy this no matter what, so why take the risk on something new? Make the more money with less effort.
Yeah, I'm done with CoD for now. I may go back if MW4 has something resembling 'innovation'.
Activision knows that people will buy this no matter what, so why take the risk on something new? Make the more money with less effort.
Yeah, I'm done with CoD for now. I may go back if MW4 has something resembling 'innovation'.
Y'know...I really liked this franchise. I remember the excitement leading up to days when the first game was launched. Oh the fun I had. And it's still...alright. It's just so plain now though. I thought it was something great with the originals, but now everything gets rehashed and the story is only so-so.
So y'know what?
They need to just cut the realism.
Call of Duty: Future Warfare(Far future.)
I'd pay money for that if they put half as much effort into making it as they do advertising it.
And since it's too predictable, don't respond with- "Bungie already did that."
So y'know what?
They need to just cut the realism.
Call of Duty: Future Warfare(Far future.)
I'd pay money for that if they put half as much effort into making it as they do advertising it.
And since it's too predictable, don't respond with- "Bungie already did that."
The first two videos makes me want to end my CoD buying streak. The third video makes me want to die laughing!
THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS AND THIS!^^^TitenSxull said:
i swear thats the biggest actual issue with any COD game. people exploit anything the possibly can to get an edge. that was the biggest thing that pissed me off on black ops and MW2. you know what i'm talking about, and it's not just camping. one man army and noobtubes? akimbo models? the blops famas? it's funny but i refuse to use a tactic that is used against me in an exploited way and i find the games that were the most fun were when everybody played honorably. no quick scopes, no exploited perks, weapons or tactics just straight up skill and smarts getting used.
No, it will fail because you are comparing to a Call of Duty game instead of just judging it by it's own standards.Psychotic-ishSOB said:
Your comment says you aren't expecting anything other than it to just be a step up from CoD. Assuming you play on Console, you will be solely disappointed (Dice is very good at advertising their games. A little bit too good).
OT:In all honesty, I was tremendously disappointed with this gameplay footage.
I'm a fan of the game. I find it fun. But I'm quite sure I'm not going to reach the five day mark in hours played for this one.
This may be the one that puts CoD in the ground.