NickCaligo42 said:
*big-huge snippedy snip snip*
The only issue that I have with this post is that Johnny Yong Bosch (Adam, the Power Ranger) did not play Dante, but rather Nero. Reuben Langdon played Dante in both 3 and 4. If I recall, Mr. Langdon did do some martial arts tomfoolery for Power Rangers, but there you have it.
Everything else is dead on and I struggle to see anyone coming up with a valid counter-argument.
However, in regards to the placement in the Devil May Cry story, this takes place completely outside of the series canon, so this is a different Dante.
That said, this design still offends me, and I'll explain why.
Reimaginings such as these are supposed to take the core concepts of the source material and present them through a different spectrum of tastes, correct? Yes. This design does not do that.
Let's take Batman, for instance. Batman has had numerous authors give their spin on him, and in every single spin worth a shit, he maintained his identity. But let's say that an author decides to take Bruce Wayne, and take away nearly everything about him and replace it with something else. Let's say that Bruce Wayne is now a malnourished homeless old man with completely average intellect, loose morals, and amateurish fighting ability. He puts on a leather sex suit with a leather hood in the shape of a dog's head that he found in a dumpster of a downtown sex shop and fights criminals he sees in the streets.
Trying to pass off this design as an alternate take on Dante is akin to trying to pass off that disturbed hobo as Batman. It confuses me how some people think this is very much in line with the original character. For me, it's like saying that since that hobo has a leather suit, pointy ears on his hood, and fights crime, he's Batman. There's reimagining, and then there's making an entirely different character and banking on the established name to move copies.