Well thats the problem when you start a trilogy with Bioware developing it, and end with BioEAre developing it. You may agree with me, or not, but with the way EA is now and the direction they are taking, the old Bioware is gone, never to return. At least not as what it was before.Devoneaux said:Well to be fair, so did the people who made the game.Ishal said:Mass Effect, yes. But I feel like what Chris said about studios knowing what to do with it could be a huge hazard. They might try and make it into something it isn't, or something it shouldn't be.
Honestly though, we'll see a Mass Effect movie trilogy and it will be directed by Micheal Bay, and then we will know there is a god and that he hates us.
the problem with your argument against ghouls is they aren't zombies, sure they look decayed and dessicated but most don't hunger for your flesh and really even feral ghouls don't hunger for flesh per say, they are just animalistic husks of former humans, they have lost their "self" and have reverted back to base instincts. a fair number of key story points rely on ghouls in the Fallout universe and there is a good couple of ghoul followers you can get in all the games.geier said:I'm for Fallout, the whole Fallout universe, not only FO3 (and please never FONV).
But only, when the Ghouls have no major role. We have enough Zomies in the media already.
But when forced to choose between what is given, i would take Bioshock.
Basically that would be Batman: The Animated Series. And it was awesome...Mr_Terrific said:Batman Arkham...I mean, they made a show about Superboy and that shit went on for 10 years, so why not Batman?
If it ever happened, I see Mass Effect looking like Stargate, and Bioshock like Grimm. I leave that to you guys whether that's a good or bad thing.UberPubert said:Mass Effect would be almost too easy if it weren't for the alien cast members not being able to look very much like their in-game counterparts. Asari are even the easiest ones and their tentacle heads would still look kind of goofy as just rubber scalps and blue make-up, but almost every other species has an inhuman body type. But as far as the episodic nature and the dialogue scenes go the show practically writes itself, because the games so closely resemble your average sci-fi space opera.
Bioshock is the more intriguing idea but would nearly be impossible to make into a show while maintaining the original game's essence because Jack is such a non-character and the gameplay reflects that in that all he really does for the majority of the game is sneak, scavenge and kill things. BUT I think it could work as a big-budget miniseries that more or less follows the rise and fall of Rapture leading up to just before Jack's arrival through the perspective of a handful of it's citizens, maybe including Ryan, Fontaine, and Tenenbaum.
Whenever I see someone suggest Fallout for a TV show I never can quite imagine what type of show it would be, the setting and scenes seem way more suited for a movie (there are pretty decent post apoc movies out there) rather than a show.Scarim Coral said:Honestly I would of picked Fallout 3 over Bioshock as to me Bioshock seen to have a limited cast in my view when it come to being a TV show.
AS for the request, not too sure. I gonna have to look at past episodes comments that I was quite dissapointed on.
Great idea actually, I never even considered AC.Darth_Payn said:Assassin's Creed would work better as a TV show because it has more cross-media experience already, with graphic novels and the movies set just before ACII and after Revelations. I don't think Mass Effect or Bioshock would work because a huge part of their stories comes from the player's decisions.
Nah, a Fire Emblem anime would never work 'cause there's a high chance they wouldn't pair Sully with Kellam and I would be having none of that because together they are both unstoppable and kawaii as ****.Eliwood10 said:Also, I think Fire Emblem would make an amazing anime. Get on it Nintendo.