Unless they have a ton of stamps to send us a nuke through the postage, then I see no reason to be worried.
Go pout in the corner, NK.
Go pout in the corner, NK.
Yeah guess what? that wasn't the militaries decision it was a politician who cant do simple math by the name of Obama and unlike Iraq, North Korea would just be folded back in with South Korea making the transition much easier.evilthecat said:It's really fucking sad to see so many people condemning North Korean propaganda while spouting US propaganda. Invincible US military huh? Liberating the people of North Korea huh? Do I even need to mention that Iraq is about to be taken over by an al-Qaeda splinter group?
I should also add that the title is incorrect. There is no mention of war in the article quoted, it merely promises a "retaliation".
As long as it is Northern California of course, preferably by Sacramento, then maybe then that wasteful train project will be stopped for good.youji itami said:C'mon North Korea please nuke California, I want to see modern full HD images of what happens at a nuke blast zone and it's not like anyone will care if California is turned into a crater.
To quote Red vs. Blue: "Sir, I think we're under attack... a very sloppy, poorly coordinated attack..."The White Hunter said:
Sure thing. Cool story guys.
I'm sure you could do anything to begin to dent the US military.
This... If Iraq, Iran, or heck better yet... Putin were making a worldwide released movie about assassinate Obama (Or Bush for you Republicans) the US would lose their mind about it, and try to enforce an embargo with all of their allies.LaoJim said:Thank you Jupiter065, I'm surprised by how many people on this thread don't have a problem with this. I saw the trailer for this a few days ago and thought it was in very poor taste. Making a comedy about the government-sponsored killing of a real named world leader (albeit a not very nice one) seems completely off.Jupiter065 said:I'm having a hard time imagining something more tasteless than making a movie about assassinating a current world leader.
Also it looked deeply unfunny.
Umm... China has money in the US sure, but it has money in every nation. It wouldn't be a risk to China to go to war with the US. On the other hand probably a good 50-60% (I'm low balling) of the US consumer goods would dry up in a week because almost everything now days is made in China.ecoho said:you know I usually avoid Seth Rogan movies but ill have to see this one if only to support people pissing off NK cause lets face it if they went to war with the US it wouldn't be a war it would be pest control. Also to all those thinking china will back NK think again they have too much money in the US to risk the whole "were at war now so we owe you nothing" decision that would come from the US the second they came in.
I'm not.Lightknight said:The things to worry about aren't large scale attacks from them aside from cyber attacks. The thing to worry about is specific attacks that can be carried out by one or two people already on our soil. For example, assassination. Not necessarily of our leaders buy maybe these actors? That is something to be concerned about.
Get out of here with your level headed commentary. This is a thread for 'Merica, not a reasonable examination of the consequences of starting a war. Honestly though, everyone's just joking. Considering how many posts are about nuking California, which I'm sure no one actually wants to happen, I think we're all here to just spout a little nonsense and move on. Don't take Ecoho's bait and try to have a serious conversation under a thread about a Seth Rogen movie.evilthecat said:It's really fucking sad to see so many people condemning North Korean propaganda while spouting US propaganda. Invincible US military huh? Liberating the people of North Korea huh? Do I even need to mention that Iraq is about to be taken over by an al-Qaeda splinter group?
I should also add that the title is incorrect. There is no mention of war in the article quoted, it merely promises a "retaliation".