Notch Dumps on EA "Indie Bundle"

Darkmantle

New member
Oct 30, 2011
1,031
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Devoneaux said:
The same way nobody put a gun to Bioware's head over the ME3 ending.
What is that even supposed to mean?
I believe he's taking a shot over all of this website's journalists shitting on the "re-take mass effect" thing.

you know, throwing a hissy fit because people were "demanding" bioware change the ending, getting all mad and calling gamers names, saying we were setting the industry back and destroying artistic integrity etc etc. You know, fire and brimstone stuff.


well no one had a gun to bioware's head, so I guess you guys should have just cooled it right? I mean, we weren't invading the offices and taking hostages, there wasn't a GUN to anyone's head.

Maybe practice what you preach?


ah well, still defending EA, at least it's logically consistent eh?
 

Johnson McGee

New member
Nov 16, 2009
516
0
0
IMO: 'indie bundle' strongly overlaps with 'humble indie bundle' which gives the false implication that EA is actually donating the profits to charity. Of which the very notion is ridiculous.
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Nobody's forcing anyone to buy EA's products, or to pay for their "nickel and dime" DLC, or use Origin, or anything else. EA makes a product and offers that product under certain conditions; consumers then choose whether or not they want to lay out their money for it. And millions upon millions of people say "Yes, please."

If anyone in that equation is "destroying" the industry - which, for the record, is absolute nonsense - it's not EA, it's the purchasing public. It's you.

EA doesn't have a gun to anybody's head, and it's the height of ridiculousness to suggest otherwise.

As for Notch's comments, they're beyond disingenuous. "EA is methodically destroying gaming" is not a statement that needs clarification.
The sad thing is that there are too few people that get what you are saying.

In the past couple of years I've seen the mentality grow leaps and bounds, the mentality of the customer is always right.....also that the customer has absolutely no responsibility for what they buy.

1.)People don't realize/remember that "the customer is always right" isn't a company rule/law, that it was a phrase made and used by companies as a deceiving tactic to keep customers buying. It means that sellers should create an illusion that the customers are right; the customers are happy thinking they are right, even though the sellers got everything they wanted and didn't have to compromise themselves(lose profit). It has been abandoned by most companies these days, because with the way things are, they lose profit in the long run.

2.) Some people that bought Mass Effect 2 complained about all the DLC it had, as well as about points they didn't like about the story and changes in gameplay. The same people bought Dragon Age 2 and went ape shit over things they had problems with in the story and gameplay. The same people complained about things they had problems with in Mass Effect 3, from leaks, before it was released. The same people bought Mass Effect 3 and complained about those "problems" that they saw in the leaks and are still in the game. They went even more ape shit and started petitions, etc, etc, everybody knows the situation by now. These people also go along with Notch, and spout out how EA is destroying the industry.

At what point will these people realize they are also to blame as well? They keep buying and turning around to complain. At what point will they realize that this is what EA has done for years, and it is idiotic for these people to keep buying the stuff and continue to rant?

The sad truth is never, because an idea has slowly taken hold of people, and those people seem to have become a majority voice. That idea is that companies that are looking to make profit are evil and that the only thing companies should look out for is the customers.

Fewer and fewer people understand that the reason people start businesses and make companies is to make profit.

EA is a company, that while having vasts amounts of backlash against them, they are still making huge profits. If they can still make large profits by hardly changing anything, if at all, when people complain, there is no motivation to make the complainers happy. It could get them more profits, but they are already making steady profits so there is no need to change(because change costs money, usually more than the gain in return).

The complainers don't seem to understand the concepts of: "If you don't like what a company does with their products, go buy from someone else." -and- "If you keep buying from a company and keep continuing to complain, the company is going to do nothing because they keep getting your money." They see it as forfeiting your right to complain. And they are right, because you can go buy from someone else.

Edit: People need more education on how companies work, and how the mentality I discussed is wrong.
 

blackrave

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,020
0
0
VonKlaw said:
With the only problem being that EA are "bringing games to the masses" by draining developers of smaller games until they're no good to them anymore, and then ditching their lifeless husk like some form of money vampire.

They did it with Bullfrog, they did it with WESTWOOD, and they're doing it with Bioware.
Fixed
Anyway, getting bought by EA is a bad sign
 

Johnson McGee

New member
Nov 16, 2009
516
0
0
Buretsu said:
Johnson McGee said:
IMO: 'indie bundle' strongly overlaps with 'humble indie bundle' which gives the false implication that EA is actually donating the profits to charity. Of which the very notion is ridiculous.
Yeah, it would have been so much better if EA had BUNDLED a bunch of INDIE games into an "independent clump" to avoid that...
Captain, our sarcasm readings are off the charts!

Yes, there are plenty of ways that EA could have presented their PACK or GROUP or SET or BUNCH etc.

besides, if Mojang can get sued for using the word 'Scrolls'...

EA, lawyers, bullying, DRM, Origin, unethical, yadda yadda yadda, it's late and I don't feel like arguing.
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
Darkmantle said:
Andy Chalk said:
What is that even supposed to mean?
I believe he's taking a shot over all of this website's journalists shitting on the "re-take mass effect" thing.

you know, throwing a hissy fit because people were "demanding" bioware change the ending, getting all mad and calling gamers names, saying we were setting the industry back and destroying artistic integrity etc etc. You know, fire and brimstone stuff.


well no one had a gun to bioware's head, so I guess you guys should have just cooled it right? I mean, we weren't invading the offices and taking hostages, there wasn't a GUN to anyone's head.

Maybe practice what you preach?


ah well, still defending EA, at least it's logically consistent eh?
What Andy said wasn't in defense of EA. A person calling people out on something doesn't mean that that person is on the side of the thing that the other people are against.

It seems to be that the majority of the people complaining about EA, are people that keep buying from EA and complain about them with every purchase.

What Andy was getting at is that at this point, it is the fault of the consumer, because they keep buying EA's games. Yes EA in the distant past did things that these people liked, but since they are now, then they should just move on to another company.

I use to like Sierra Mist, 7UP, and Canada Dry Ginger Ale, but ever since they went "all natural", I think they taste like crap. So, I don't buy or drink them anymore.

What I'm getting at is that these people that continually buy EA games and complain every time, are like if I kept buying those drinks and drinking them even though I think they taste like crap. I moved on and found other drinks I liked. They need to move on and find other games they might like from different companies.

Moving on, I will add that what you said about this site's journalists is wrong. The only person I've seen that fits the picture of what you said, "fire and brimstone stuff", is Movie Bob.

Guess what, he isn't a journalist. He is a critic/commentator. What he does for this site is make things that might entertain people, and also he expresses his views.
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
ITT: People hating on EA because it's cool.

Heads up, guys--EA is successful because they are doing something right. Get up on your little stool and shout all you like about the integrity of gaming, but you're just more a fool for it. EA snatches up good talent and gives people want they want. The reason they highest selling video games ever under their belt is because people like them. You can call them shit, you can critique their business practices all you want, but nothing will change the fact they are the most successful force in gaming because of us.

Indie development is fine. There are hundreds of thousands of indie games available, many of them for free or insanely cheap, all over the web. It's never been easier to make games and more and more people are giving us more and more creative and original ideas. If you can't see them, you aren't looking.

Gaming is fine. EA is fine. Get over it.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Comapnies always do what they think they can get away with. Since EA knows they cna get away with by using word "indie" in a place where indie never existed to increase sales, they will, and they did.
 

Grey Day for Elcia

New member
Jan 15, 2012
1,773
0
0
Revolutionaryloser said:
Grey Day for Elcia said:
ITT: People hating on EA because it's cool.

Heads up, guys--EA is successful because they are doing something right. Get up on your little stool and shout all you like about the integrity of gaming, but you're just more a fool for it. EA snatches up good talent and gives people want they want. The reason they highest selling video games ever under their belt is because people like them. You can call them shit, you can critique their business practices all you want, but nothing will change the fact they are the most successful force in gaming because of us.

Indie development is fine. There are hundreds of thousands of indie games available, many of them for free or insanely cheap, all over the web. It's never been easier to make games and more and more people are giving us more and more creative and original ideas. If you can't see them, you aren't looking.

Gaming is fine. EA is fine. Get over it.
Just so you know. I hate EA, I don't buy their games and an oligopolized market is harmful to everyone (this is like really basic economics). Even if capitalism is the best system we've come up with so far, it doesn't mean powerful people can't take advantage of that system.

EA has a lot of tools smaller fish don't have: advertising, lawyers, massive production budgets and in general obscene amounts of money they can use to do whatever they want and we are pretty aware that 99% of the time nobody can stop them.

As we have to just live with the fact that EA are immortal scum that will just cause more destruction the more we try to kill them, the least we can do is choose what it will or won't kill. Indie games represent everything EA is against, so the moment that they start usurping that position it is perfectly understandable that people who don't like EA will be pissed off and they have every right to let it be known that they are pissed off.

I'm not feeding EA. There are tons of people who aren't feeding EA. There are a lot more people who basically must choose between feeding EA or giving up their hobby. None of us need to be preached about the irony of our actions and more importantly, EA doesn't need anybody defending their actions.
Indie games are fine. There are more indie titles now than ever before in the history of the art. It's easier and cheaper than ever before to make your own game and with the massive popularity of social networking, it's simpler than ever to advertise.

I'm not certain, but I can fairly comfortably say every single game I've played for the past month has been independently made and published, bar one. Just because there's a big fish in the pond doesn't mean there aren't smaller fish in it, or indeed entirely different pods to choose from.

I'm sure some people (like you, it seems) have reasons for disliking EA and believe said reasons are valid and justifiable. I have no problem with that. I do, however, get sick and tired of everyone and their dog jumping on the 'we hate EA' wagon just because they didn't like ME3, or some other bullshit. $10 says that at least three quarters of the people here railing on EA and going on about how shit destructive to the industry they think EA is, do nothing at all to follow through with their supposed beliefs and, not only that, but continue to buy EA games. last time I checked my 'games I have purchased but have yet to play' list, there's no Electronic Arts games there and a whole load of indie projects.

I'm not some hipster or something, in to 'indie' because it's underground and I don't believe big AAA titles are shit. I just feel that I've played everything the big guys have to offer right now and so I've dug into the lesser known stuff. It's their own fault if others can't seem to see beyond the EA forest.
 

Contradiction

New member
May 20, 2009
123
0
0
Two of my biggest pet hates in gaming in one article...
Notch and EA
devilofthemist said:
wow notch having a tiffy fit at somebody over twitter, never seen that before
Pretty much this.
As mind numbingly stupid as EA can be Notch's whining just makes me want to take their side even more.