Except that isn't even remotely true. You know how I know?squid5580 said:They wouldn't need a doorman turning people away. The name says it all. Only this type of person is welcome here. The rest aren't!
GaymerX says it's not. The last con didn't make it so. Straights attended. End of story.
Now, would you care to rephrase? Possibly answer my question? Maybe even apologise to "Gaymers" for false equivalence?
No, it was an attempt to point out how absurd it is to point out that the alternative will do exactly what the existing situation already does.Peithelo said:but I suppose your message was an attempt at sarcasm.
Look, it's nice that you have never noticed this sort of thing happening, that's good for you. Unfortunately, it is still a real thing which exists and which gays fear. Also, nobody's really proposing this as a "permanent" solution.
I was going to call this false equivalence, but then I remembered all those laws across the country calling to ban gamer marriages. Then it all came back: The Senators on TV opposing laws preventing you from beating up long hairs, the debate on letting poor people into the military, the "hardcore only" drinking fountains, chick Fil-a donating to anti-yourth organisations....squid5580 said:I'm sorry but what community doesn't take their lumps on a regular basis? Too old, to young, to rich, to poor, homed or homeless, hair too long, hair too short, casual or hardcore gamer. I don't know a single type of person who hasn't been singled out due to something and been picked on for it.
And now I feel horrible for daring to trivialise the struggles of those groups compared to homosexuals. Clearly, these groups have suffered enough for this to be a fair, equatable comparison.