I think that FF VIII is one of the best games in the series.loved the junction system, the characters and the steampunk vibe. A LOT of people disagree with this.
How is "WoW is popular because everyone's friends are there" (a bit of a tautology to begin with) relevant to my assertion that WoW and Rift are comparable in terms of actual quality, and that both could stand to learn a thing or two from DDO?bahumat42 said:How was my original point a tangent and irrelevant.
Its totally relevant.
I wasn't talking about popularity.The reason people are staying with it isn't because they think other mmo's are bad (the original hypothesis laid in this thread) but their community is on WOWs.
I'm not even gonna ask what "you people" means here.My big bang you people are hard to talk to sometimes.
I plead the Fifth on whether or not WoW's fanbase is any sort of point in its favor. The fact remains that popularity does not equal quality. (See also: music.)artanis_neravar said:Because the community is what makes WoW the best MMO out there
i just need to see these figures, say a man is 30 when he murders someone, he roughly has 50 years left to just rot in jail taking up space/food/time/tax money(don't prisons get paid by tax money? if i'm not mistaken? at least some.) of everyone around him, how does giving him a quick volt of electricity or sleep medicine cost more than that? I'm just saying i would like to see figures before i believe something such as that.Uriel-238 said:Ectogenesis [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_uterus] can ultimately resolve the abortion controversy, and should be used to do so. Though it will raise other issues from some of the same sources, namely those groups who believe sex should be for reproduction only.
Left-Handers are due more respect than they get. That said, user-input in video games does not get from developers the respect and attention it deserves.
Sexual monogamy is overrated, and permanent marriage is an inappropriate goal for a people that frequently lives to be over seventy. Our society would be better served by promoting sexual responsibility, and regarding sexually transmitted pathogens as they do those that are transmitted via other vectors.
Irony said:Cannibalism, necrophilia, and zoophilia aren't bad on principle. They can be bad, but they aren't pure eeeeeeeeevil.sexual paraphilia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia]) has inhibited our ability to treat, and thus our ability to control preventatively, sexual predators.Slimshad said:Hey, as long as it's not pedophilia and you're not abusing animals (is that zoophilia?), seems fine to me. No one was using that corpse anyways.
Zarmi said:Death penalty = Yes please.It actually costs more to kill them than it does to lock them up for life. Besides which, conviction beyond reasonable doubt has wrongfully buried plenty of innocent men and women already, here in the US.gmaverick019 said:i actually forgot about this, if the person is proclaimed without a doubt a murderer/rapist/etc.. then yes, may they have the death penalty ASAP so we don't waste a single cent more on them through government spending or taxes.
238U.
It's not the actual killing that is expensive (although it's getting harder as more and more countries flat out refuse to sell the drugs to the US); it's the constant retrials. No judge wants innocent blood on his hands, so the appeals are allowed, and the investigation done again. Every. Single. Time.gmaverick019 said:i just need to see these figures, say a man is 30 when he murders someone, he roughly has 50 years left to just rot in jail taking up space/food/time/tax money(don't prisons get paid by tax money? if i'm not mistaken? at least some.) of everyone around him, how does giving him a quick volt of electricity or sleep medicine cost more than that? I'm just saying i would like to see figures before i believe something such as that.
Down to flat-out insulting me, I see.bahumat42 said:You people means gormless forum dwellers who like to deal on pedantic issues like the one i am now responding to.
And its popularity has EVERYTHING to do with why its a better game. It's an MMO they live and die on the people you are playing with. It's a very simple concept. Which you seem incapable of grasping for whatever reason.
ooooooooooooooooh i understand that, i meant in a theoretical world where that shit isn't allowed,which i thought you understand that, what i meant was if it is clear that person is a fuckwad, for whatever reason amongst murder/rape/etc.., then that piece of shit get the death penalty later that day, no retrials, none of that shit.Apostropartheid said:It's not the actual killing that is expensive (although it's getting harder as more and more countries flat out refuse to sell the drugs to the US); it's the constant retrials. No judge wants innocent blood on his hands, so the appeals are allowed, and the investigation done again. Every. Single. Time.gmaverick019 said:i just need to see these figures, say a man is 30 when he murders someone, he roughly has 50 years left to just rot in jail taking up space/food/time/tax money(don't prisons get paid by tax money? if i'm not mistaken? at least some.) of everyone around him, how does giving him a quick volt of electricity or sleep medicine cost more than that? I'm just saying i would like to see figures before i believe something such as that.
I agree alot with this.Legion said:I don't think Gears of War is a mindless shooter full of "macho space marines".
Single player is the more important component than multiplayer when it comes to games, unless they are primarily meant for online/cooperative play (Left 4 Dead for example). This is a popular opinion on this site, but overall in the world of gaming it is not.
I suppose in a perfect world where it were possible to prove without a doubt that somebody is guilty, yeah, then it would be cheaper. No retrials for you. In reality, this isn't the case and there is always doubt, hence human rights. (Although I must add that I am morally against the state given the power of life and death.)gmaverick019 said:ooooooooooooooooh i understand that, i meant in a theoretical world where that shit isn't allowed,which i thought you understand that, what i meant was if it is clear that person is a fuckwad, for whatever reason amongst murder/rape/etc.., then that piece of shit get the death penalty later that day, no retrials, none of that shit.
I hear this all the freaking time, I get it, but fuck that guy (I'm grouping them all in one). Wrestling is awesome and you can't convince me otherwise.Haydyn said:Wrestling
I swear to God if one more asshole compares wrestling to gay guys touching eachother I'm going to Diamond Cutter them. It's something fans have heard a million times, and saying it doesn't make you some kind of badass rebel. It just makes you an unoriginal douchebag./end rant
thats more or less what i meant, if proven, especially if it was pure video proof of the person doing such, or dna/physical evidence, then i don't see a problem with letting the law smug one resource absorbing fuck out of society.Apostropartheid said:I suppose in a perfect world where it were possible to prove without a doubt that somebody is guilty, yeah, then it would be cheaper. No retrials for you. In reality, this isn't the case and there is always doubt, hence human rights. (Although I must add that I am morally against the state given the power of life and death.)gmaverick019 said:ooooooooooooooooh i understand that, i meant in a theoretical world where that shit isn't allowed,which i thought you understand that, what i meant was if it is clear that person is a fuckwad, for whatever reason amongst murder/rape/etc.., then that piece of shit get the death penalty later that day, no retrials, none of that shit.
Þis. Very much þis. Soylent green might be a difficult option to sell people on, but what's wrong wiþ being ground up, sterilized, and used as fertilizer like every oþer animal on earþ? At þe very least, could we stop putting caskets in concrete boxes þat prevent þem from ever reentering þe environment? Dust to dust doesn't mean much when you insist on sealing þat dust away.KorLeonis said:Graveyards are a waste of space. Corpses should be donated to science, ground up and used as fertilizer or animal feed, or otherwise disposed of in the cleanest and cheapest way possible. It has ceased to be a person, its just rotting meat, why does it need its own piece of land for year and years to come?
Surprisingly, most people don't agree with me. Odd, eh?