So, in your moral observation, those scribbling on paper are worthy of death threats. *shrugs* If you say so.Nadiril said:First of all I'd like people to read this http://www.cracked.com/article_18510_6-supposedly-ancient-traditions-that-totally-arent.html to see that first of all, islam extremism is actually a more modern thing. Secondly to this quote
I would have less problems with the facebook page if it was in reaction to something that westerners didn't start. We all know that south park created that episode probably knowing that they would get death threats. in fact anyone else remember their family guy episode? So this is where its at fault. I would have no problem if your being provocative in reply to something they had said. For example http://blogcritics.org/culture/article/muslim-clerics-uncovered-meat-remarks-spark/ If in response to this comment all the women of australia got infront of the clerics house in bikini's that would be something that i'd be all too happy to support. But since south park started all this by insulting a religion because they could, I have a problem with this type of provocation. (note i haven't seen the episode with mohammed in it)Cliff_m85 said:Define 'provacative'.
And why not be provacative just to be provacative? Isn't that what Lenny Bruce did? And he helped every single person in America by being provacative.
I can make fun of whatever I want. If I were to pull away from one subject, that would be even more disrespectful because it suggests that, well, everyone else can handle it but you're too much of a child to so I'll back off. No. That's even more disrespectful.
Beauty, too. Since you state that you don't even know what you're talking about. The episode in question was ultimately respectful of Muhammad. They even proved their point of "religion is fair game" by depicting Buddha snorting coke (no threats from Buddhists, oddly) and Jesus watching pornography (no threats from Christians, oddly). Muhammad wasn't mocked in any form, honestly.