What? Who said they're using this "to market Tekken"? As far as I understand it, they're just the same people who work on Tekken..Not G. Ivingname said:I do have to ask, why are they using THIS to market Tekken? Tekken isn't a dating sim series, it's a FIGHTING game series. Really, this should be it's own game. There is a (disturbing) market for it, why not just make a game directly for them.
It's Team Tekken. Not the Tekken franchise. There's no discussion about Team Tekken making an interactive VR simulator to market Tekken. Their simply spreading their technical expertise into other markets for their bosses at the top.Not G. Ivingname said:I do have to ask, why are they using THIS to market Tekken? Tekken isn't a dating sim series, it's a FIGHTING game series. Really, this should be it's own game. There is a (disturbing) market for it, why not just make a game directly for them.
It's been awhile since I saw an Escapist article follow no standards what-so-ever. This isn't a news story, and shouldn't be in the "news" section of any website. This is your own (culturally bias) opinion of this game, and should have been labeled as such, not as a news story. I probably wouldn't have been comfortable with it either, but present the facts and let me make up my own mind instead of defaming Japanese culture in a story that probably would result in a Warning if it was in the forum.Steven Bogos said:Perv on a Japanese Schoolgirl in Tekken Team's Project Morpheus Demo
Well, the Tekken team has certainly made its audience clear...
Oh Japan. I mean, I'm sure that when VR first started gaining traction, people were wondering how they were going to find more... perverted uses of the technology, but you wouldn't have thought Sony would use such a demo in its official, pre-Tokyo Games Show press conference? Well, that's pretty much exactly what has happened, as the Tekken team has used the press conference to announce "Summer Lesson" - a Project Morpheus game where you perv on a Japanese school girl.
Summer Lesson puts the player in said school girl's room, where players will interact with the girl... in some way. That's about all the solid details we were able to ascertain from the short demo, but it had a very, very creepy voyeuristic feel about it, particularly when the player would get too close to the girl and she would pull back in discomfort.
The player is also shown nodding, or shaking their head, in response to the girl's yes or no questions.
While it's not explicitly explicit, it's certainly somewhat... disappointing to see Sony appealing to such a base instinct, particularly with all that female representation in video games controversy [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/137184-Anita-Sarkeesian-and-Gamers-Against-Games] flowing around the web recently.
The demo will be playable at this year's Tokyo Game Show, which we will be attending, so we will be sure to update once we've gone hands (or eyes?) on with it.
Source: Sony [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D-Wr_3-E5U]
Permalink
Am I not permitted to be morally against any depiction of such things? Would you disagree that the general consensus is that even fictional depictions of it are wrong?Ruisu said:Why would it not be morally acceptable? Isn't the whole issue with pedophily and child pornography the damage it can cause to the children involved? So what is morally wrong with the fictional depiction of the crime?Lightknight said:However, I would be against pornographic depictions of a child even if it weren't actually a child and was just a construction.
So I'm trying to disagree with the individual's misappropriation of the term to apply to non-humans while simultaneously not trying to say it's morally acceptable to depict, even fictionally, children in inappropriate ways even though there's no victim in a fictional construction.
Ironically... the Japanese do.Deshin said:no one in their right mind refers to teenagers as 'children'
Rocket Girl said:Snip
Rocket Girl said:I am using English and English allows me to define the world child to mean a human under the age of majority. If you don't want to use that English or you think it's bad, ok. But that has nothing to do with the validity of the definition.
It should also be noted that Japan actually has some areas with 13 years old being the age of consent. I mean, gross, but true.Draconalis said:Rocket Girl said:I am using English and English allows me to define the world child to mean a human under the age of majority. If you don't want to use that English or you think it's bad, ok. But that has nothing to do with the validity of the definition.
This also means you can't be taken seriously.
Also, "your English" is flawed because it's not taking into account the variability of Age of Consent.