Ya they do some crazy parodies and Pokemon has been asking for it forever. We need to stop the violence on flamboyant neon animals! Just because they have more flair doesn't mean that they fight well.Ice Car said:You're only 14 years late PETA.
Human lives have value--even genuine animal rights folks and people who think that PETA has any acceptable stances (they don't) or doesn't support terrorism or the harming and killing of humans (they do).kitetsu said:Why can't somebody just start a shooting and bombing rampage in all PETA facilities and offices already? It's like watching a little kid enjoy peeling off scabs and laugh as the scabs leave copious amounts of bleeding before licking the blood.
Correct. Thankfully, most people care about animal welfare, instead. Animals are not of equal (or even comparable) value to humans nor do they deserve (or can they use, comprehend, or appreciate) "rights". Animals used by humans (as pets, for labor or peaceful entertainment, for food, or for advancing medicine [for both animals and humans]) should be treated with kindness and compassion and should be treated with the respect that animals deserve (i.e., don't kill them or cause them pain for no reason). Also, while not eating meat is nice, it's not a luxury everyone can manage, and veganism is downright silly, if only for the "no honey" aspect of it.Airsoftslayer93 said:If you all really cared about animal rights you would all be vegans and would support PETA.
Actually this use of satire that hurts the image of a product is not protected by Fair Use, the courts have ruled on cases like this before. I wouldn't be surprised if it did end up in court.Kopikatsu said:gardian06 said:who taught PETA flash? who? whoever did you have some explaining to do.
when do the copywrite charges start dropping I mean like hardcore. Pokemon is a registered trade mark so is their likenesses. I mean Nintendo could probably crush PETA financially without even sweating. unless Nintendo is afraid that their Redmond office will get firebombed or something.EvilChameleon said:This won't stay long with Nintendo's copyright lawyers on the case.It's a parody that wasn't made for monetary gain (That is, they aren't selling it).gigastar said:Hey, Nintendo, unliscenced use of your biggest IP right there by an internet hate figure.
Go nuts!
Pokemon: Black and Blue is doubly protected. Nintendo can't do nothin'.
Captcha: Fair Play
Very close Captcha, but it's actually 'Fair Use'.
You may be right about this game being protected under fair use, that would be for a court to decide. I think it would be closer than you think, but win or lose, Nintendo can really hurt PETA bad for this. Nintendo just has more resources, more lawyers and more money, and could force PETA to spend a LOT of money defending themselves. Money that PETA will likely not be able to get back. Win or lose, PETA stands to lose. Like it or not, the side with the most money has the best odds in the civil courtroom.Kopikatsu said:gardian06 said:who taught PETA flash? who? whoever did you have some explaining to do.
when do the copywrite charges start dropping I mean like hardcore. Pokemon is a registered trade mark so is their likenesses. I mean Nintendo could probably crush PETA financially without even sweating. unless Nintendo is afraid that their Redmond office will get firebombed or something.EvilChameleon said:This won't stay long with Nintendo's copyright lawyers on the case.It's a parody that wasn't made for monetary gain (That is, they aren't selling it).gigastar said:Hey, Nintendo, unliscenced use of your biggest IP right there by an internet hate figure.
Go nuts!
Pokemon: Black and Blue is doubly protected. Nintendo can't do nothin'.
Captcha: Fair Play
Very close Captcha, but it's actually 'Fair Use'.
It's the Earth Liberation Front. ELF. I'm amazed the ELF hasn't been shut down by the FBI. I mean, they are designated terrorists.Tanis said:PETA support Eco-terrorist groups like ELF (or is it ALF?)
Why would ANYONE support PETA?