Right. But Saelune's justification for believing children are being tortured is that they have died. As promptly evidenced by the equal assumption that a child who dies in daycare did so because the were abused. It's circular reasoning. You can't assume someone was abusing a child because the child died and then blame that person for the death because they abused the child. You need a source of information that isn't your own assumptions.Thaluikhain said:If daycares were run by a single organisation going out of its way to torture kids, then if a kid died under their supervision you'd probably wonder, though.
And you don't?tstorm823 said:You need a source of information that isn't your own assumptions.
The administration has actively argued that the conditions are humane and that they don't have to improve anything. There have been outbreaks of disease due to how unsanitary everything is. They knowingly are putting these people into awful conditions and doing nothing to improve the conditions. As I posted yesterday, they are considering shipping them all to facilities that may or may not exist in Guatemala. Ya know, one of those "safe" countries that they're fleeing from. It doesn't matter that they're not literally putting bags over their heads and beating them, their conditions are torturous. The suffering is the point. The conditions are the point. This whole situation was manufactured to be as awful as possible as a deterrent. The administration has said so in the past, and it's only recently that they've changed tune.tstorm823 said:Right. But Saelune's justification for believing children are being tortured is that they have died. As promptly evidenced by the equal assumption that a child who dies in daycare did so because the were abused. It's circular reasoning. You can't assume someone was abusing a child because the child died and then blame that person for the death because they abused the child. You need a source of information that isn't your own assumptions.Thaluikhain said:If daycares were run by a single organisation going out of its way to torture kids, then if a kid died under their supervision you'd probably wonder, though.
The quote is "Facts don't care about your feelings," not "Facts don't care about his feelings."Saelune said:And you don't?tstorm823 said:You need a source of information that isn't your own assumptions.
The department running these camps are arguing, in court, in front of a judge, that providing toothpaste, beds, and showers aren't necessary to provide a safe and sanitary environment.tstorm823 said:Right. But Saelune's justification for believing children are being tortured is that they have died. As promptly evidenced by the equal assumption that a child who dies in daycare did so because the were abused. It's circular reasoning. You can't assume someone was abusing a child because the child died and then blame that person for the death because they abused the child. You need a source of information that isn't your own assumptions.Thaluikhain said:If daycares were run by a single organisation going out of its way to torture kids, then if a kid died under their supervision you'd probably wonder, though.
Damn near half the workforce was involved.tstorm823 said:Some doctors and teachers have done bad things. So we should get rid of schools and hospitals, right?Kwak said:The evil people themselves beg to differ.
https://www.propublica.org/article/secret-border-patrol-facebook-group-agents-joke-about-migrant-deaths-post-sexist-memes
Facts are left-wing.Avnger said:The quote is "Facts don't care about your feelings," not "Facts don't care about his feelings."Saelune said:And you don't?tstorm823 said:You need a source of information that isn't your own assumptions.![]()
They don't WANT to let them in, even if they are 'the good ones'.SupahEwok said:I'll say that although you can have an argument on where exactly the line between refugee camp and concentration camp is, it's pretty clear which side the administration is falling on.
I'm in favor of refugee camps, personally. Most of the folks coming in right now qualify. If they had any personal capital, they wouldn't be trudging a thousand miles, families in tow. We need time to set them up with papers and immunizations. They need time for a crash course in English, citizenship (not enough to become citizens, they can pursue that later if they want, but they need to know US law), a jumpstart in some sort of craft or field they can pursue employment in, and knowledge of the agencies and programs that can provide them further aid in integration once they leave the camp.
And the camps don't have to be any sort of 5-star hotel accommodations, but we can do better than overcrowded tents in the desert.
A six month integration program should be possible, on an organizational level. It'll cost money, sure, but at least you're setting them up with the tools to start earning their keep on release, rather than being perpetual burdens on the welfare state.
But the administration that be would rather keep on increasing the proportion of the national budget the military gets, and insisting on getting funding for a wall that would only ever keep on costing money in the future instead of earning it and entering the taxation system. They're much easier bullet points to spout for re-election.
True. Few of the cranially endowed would claim Trump in their group.Saelune said:They don't WANT to let them in, even if they are 'the good ones'.SupahEwok said:I'll say that although you can have an argument on where exactly the line between refugee camp and concentration camp is, it's pretty clear which side the administration is falling on.
I'm in favor of refugee camps, personally. Most of the folks coming in right now qualify. If they had any personal capital, they wouldn't be trudging a thousand miles, families in tow. We need time to set them up with papers and immunizations. They need time for a crash course in English, citizenship (not enough to become citizens, they can pursue that later if they want, but they need to know US law), a jumpstart in some sort of craft or field they can pursue employment in, and knowledge of the agencies and programs that can provide them further aid in integration once they leave the camp.
And the camps don't have to be any sort of 5-star hotel accommodations, but we can do better than overcrowded tents in the desert.
A six month integration program should be possible, on an organizational level. It'll cost money, sure, but at least you're setting them up with the tools to start earning their keep on release, rather than being perpetual burdens on the welfare state.
But the administration that be would rather keep on increasing the proportion of the national budget the military gets, and insisting on getting funding for a wall that would only ever keep on costing money in the future instead of earning it and entering the taxation system. They're much easier bullet points to spout for re-election.
Trump on twitter recently told a bunch of non-white American female politicians who were democratically elected for them to 'go back to their terrible countries'. Again, let me hammer it home, he told a bunch of AMERICANS to 'go back to their countries' due to them not being white.
That's right, the undemocratic despot told a bunch of people they are not American solely cause of their skin color.
Yep.Kyle Gaddo said:Just chiming in to say:
They're concentration camps.
Any historian will tell you that that is the correct term to use. [https://www.vox.com/first-person/2019/6/20/18693058/aoc-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-concentration-camps-immigration-border]
If any of you have a different opinion and can provide your documented expertise, then you are welcome to.
Well, how many of them come from a country that isn't being run into the ground?Saelune said:Trump on twitter recently told a bunch of non-white American female politicians who were democratically elected for them to 'go back to their terrible countries'.
Only 1 of them was not born in the USThaluikhain said:Well, how many of them come from a country that isn't being run into the ground?Saelune said:Trump on twitter recently told a bunch of non-white American female politicians who were democratically elected for them to 'go back to their terrible countries'.
(Ok, I'm about the zillionth person to say something like that)
Only 1 of them was not born in the USThaluikhain said:Well, how many of them come from a country that isn't being run into the ground?Saelune said:Trump on twitter recently told a bunch of non-white American female politicians who were democratically elected for them to 'go back to their terrible countries'.
(Ok, I'm about the zillionth person to say something like that)
Ah, then the answer is 1.rederoin said:At this point it clear that anybody still supporting the Trump government is supporting fascism, these concentration camps make that clear.
Only 1 of them was not born in the USThaluikhain said:Well, how many of them come from a country that isn't being run into the ground?Saelune said:Trump on twitter recently told a bunch of non-white American female politicians who were democratically elected for them to 'go back to their terrible countries'.
(Ok, I'm about the zillionth person to say something like that)