Seanchaidh said:
They don't have the option to leave.
https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/us-immigration/deportation-removal-proceedings.html
"Non-citizens have the right to a lawyer, as well as other rights under the U.S. Constitution. The immigration authorities cannot simply deport someone without providing a chance to be heard.
Of course, the authorities often try to make the process go quickly, by asking the immigrant to sign something agreeing to depart without a hearing. In some cases, when the immigrant really is in the U.S. illegally with no defense to removal, leaving voluntarily can be the best way to go, because it avoids having an order of deportation on one's record."
Yes, they do have the option to leave voluntarily. It just requires waiving your right to a hearing.
Saelune said:
You're literally defending Concentration camps.
You literally have demonstrated zero understanding of what's actually happening beyond inflammatory headlines.
We are not hunting people down to put into concentration camps. They are coming to the US, through great personal hardship, to request asylum here. And we guarantee them the right to plead their case, every single one. Those who come to a point of entry don't get detained (unless there's already a warrant for their arrest or a felony immigration violation on their record). Some of them jump the border rather than go to a point of entry. We don't just deport them, we still guarantee them the right to a court hearing to plead their asylum case. If they don't want to be held in America, we allow them to waive that right and leave the country without a deportation order. But if they break the law to get into the US and then ask for their day in court, it comes with the caveat that they aren't released immediately into the country to do as they will. That's your "concentration camps".
People who decided they wanted to leave their homes and migrate to the United States.
Who decided that it was better for them to jump the border than apply for entry.
Who decided that they'd rather be in detention than give up on asylum in the US.
To call that anything less than voluntary is outrageously infantalizing. These people made the decision to come here and be detained. And I'm not gonna fault them for that, they must have suffered hardships that I can't imagine such that leaving their homes and being held by US border patrol is the best option they have. But they made that decision themselves, and anyone who considers them passive victims is discrediting their ability to make that decision. They come here knowing we can't just let everyone in freely; if we did let everyone in freely there would be no point in coming here. You can't escape violence in the US if we aren't diligent about keeping the violence out. A substantial amount of these people have death threats against them by organized crime. That might be why they'd rather be detained in the US than wait in line in Mexico, because they're afraid and MS-13 can't murder you in a US detention center.
Detention centers weren't set up to torture immigrants. They were set up because we have to provide people with food and shelter while they wait for their hearing. They weren't made to be prisons, but rather were made because holding asylum seekers in the actual prisons is unacceptable. Separate facilities weren't made for children to punish families, they were made to give kids a more comfortable facility separate from the adults who may or may not be the violent people we're trying to keep out. None of these things were designed by racists who hate immigrants, every single one was meant with the good intentions of keeping people safe. If you think we can do better at achieving that goal, good, I agree with you. If you make no attempt to understand the situation because comparing Donald Trump to Hitler is more important to you than helping and protecting people, then I'm going to have to disagree.
undeadsuitor said:
Try 2-3 years for an asylum hearing, with immigration judges having a backlog of 2000 cases because they're understaffed (on purpose)
Most of my answers to you are contained in my response to Saelune, but this particular point is just factually incorrect. "Try 2-3 years" may or may not be accurate if you're talking about how long it takes to get asylum granted, but there are steps in between and you aren't detained for the whole process. Taking from [url-https://www.freedomforimmigrants.org/detention-statistics]this source[/url] (that's hardly pro-detention center, and is in fact trying to emphasize the harshness of them):
"In FY 2017, the average length of stay at any one immigrant prison or jail was 34 days, compared to 22 days in FY 2016 and 21 days in FY 2015."
So to reiterate, typically less than a month.