The way that I read this - in the casual tones of a gentleman secur ein his opinion as he sits in a high backed chair and sips a decent cup of tea - has made me laugh. I give you internet points.Colour Scientist said:Those are odd ways of spelling Fleetwood Mac.
Stop promoting your band, Stevie!Colour Scientist said:Those are odd ways of spelling Fleetwood Mac.
I'm reminded of an old joke. Well, old now. The Spice Girls have a lifetime achievement award. Finally, something for Michael Jackson to aspire to.Private Custard said:Success ≠ greatness. If it did, Justin Beiber and the Spice Girls would be right up there, and we all know they're shit!
You will NOT speak ill of Briany May!BathorysGraveland2 said:Out of those two, I'd say Rush as the guitar work is far more prominent.
Interesting measure. I think by Last.fm standards, Queen actually is my best band ever.DizzyChuggernaut said:In terms of last.fm plays my "best band ever" is Cryptopsy.
When Christmas comes along I just spam the jukebox at my local pub with every available Fleetwood Mac song.Colour Scientist said:Those are odd ways of spelling Fleetwood Mac.
I thought you said this was down to popular opinion, then quality per song shouldn't matterSouplex said:While the Beatles have more total good songs and are certainly more successful, Rush and Queen reach much greater heights of quality per song, and the Beatle's reached much lower depths.Zeconte said:The Beatles, only people who come even close to their success is Elvis and Elton John. Sorry to disappoint.
I objectively determined that Rush and Queen are the best bands.Littaly said:I thought you said this was down to popular opinion, then quality per song shouldn't matterSouplex said:While the Beatles have more total good songs and are certainly more successful, Rush and Queen reach much greater heights of quality per song, and the Beatle's reached much lower depths.Zeconte said:The Beatles, only people who come even close to their success is Elvis and Elton John. Sorry to disappoint.![]()
I'm not promoting my own band, those are just rumours. Although, if this were a real poll, we would win by a landslide, other bands would only win in their dreams. You'd have to be some sort of gypsy not to vote for usZachary Amaranth said:Queen was my pick before this page even loaded. Rush is...okay. I'm not sure they'd make my top twenty. If I had one. Which I don't. Because I don't do lists like that.
Stop promoting your band, Stevie!Colour Scientist said:Those are odd ways of spelling Fleetwood Mac.
Oh my God, that was so good it hurt.Colour Scientist said:I'm not promoting my own band, those are just rumours. Although, if this were a real poll, we would win by a landslide, other bands would only win in their dreams. You'd have to be some sort of gypsy not to vote for us
I don't know what the chain of events would be that would not lead us to victory, Fleetwood Mac make lovin' fun.
I'm not trying to discourage other bands though, you know? Don't stop thinking about tomorrow, if you go your own way, it may work out for you.
Ah, something something tusk something.
[sub][sub]Rhiannon[/sub][/sub]
That's one of my three favorite Beatles songs, so each to their own, I guess. Play it backwards and read up on the "Paul is Dead" conspiracy. I don't buy into the conspiracy but the connections are remarkable in their way.Souplex said:While the Beatles have more total good songs and are certainly more successful, Rush and Queen reach much greater heights of quality per song, and the Beatle's reached much lower depths.Zeconte said:The Beatles, only people who come even close to their success is Elvis and Elton John. Sorry to disappoint.