TelHybrid said:Whereas auto aim really takes a lot of skill ay?internetzealot1 said:PC controls hve always felt really fake to me... and if they make aiming easier, than that just takes skill out of the game.![]()
So your preference is controller based fps where 90% of the time auto aim is implemented as opposed to mouse aiming that's more precise and purely relies on skill... interesting.internetzealot1 said:TelHybrid said:Whereas auto aim really takes a lot of skill ay?internetzealot1 said:PC controls hve always felt really fake to me... and if they make aiming easier, than that just takes skill out of the game.![]()
Auto-aim is not your friend. It will drag your damn rifle away from your target whenever anyone walks in front of you.
Alright, alright, first of all I never said that a mouse takes THE skill out of a game. I probably should have said, "takes SOME skill out of the game" If aiming with a mouse is easier, then aiming with a controler is harder. If aiming with a controler is harder, then it will require MORE skill to hit a target. Follows?TelHybrid said:So your preference is controller based fps where 90% of the time auto aim is implemented as opposed to mouse aiming that's more precise and purely relies on skill... interesting.internetzealot1 said:TelHybrid said:Whereas auto aim really takes a lot of skill ay?internetzealot1 said:PC controls hve always felt really fake to me... and if they make aiming easier, than that just takes skill out of the game.![]()
Auto-aim is not your friend. It will drag your damn rifle away from your target whenever anyone walks in front of you.
OK maybe I'm exaggerating a bit with the 90% auto aim thing but seriously, mouse aiming feels fake? and takes the skill out of the game? Firstly since when is a mouse or analog stick realistic in regards to firing a weapon? If the Wii remote was more precise then that would be the closest thing to realistic aiming. Secondly, how does mouse aiming take the skill out of the game?
No offence dude but that logic seems flawed is all. Just saying. =S
Well are all the other runners doing the race in the wheelchair? Hmm?Dexter111 said:Just gonna Paste myself again:internetzealot1 said:Alright, alright, first of all I never said that a mouse takes THE skill out of a game. I probably should have said, "takes SOME skill out of the game" If aiming with a mouse is easier, then aiming with a controler is harder. If aiming with a controler is harder, then it will require MORE skill to hit a target. Follows?
And yes, you are right, the Wii is the most realistic aiming. But pulling a triger feels more realistic than clicking a button.
If I've adequetly justified myself, can we bring this argument to a close. We're the last two guys on the thread.
That's one of the most flawed arguments ever...
Yes, it also takes more skill to do a marathon in a wheelchair, I still have to see a runner do that out of his own free will though.
So you do realize that you can aim better with a mouse yet consciously chose the inferior controller instead of using the best one possible for a certain task and actually developing your "skill" inside the game instead of trying to battle with the controller?
By your definition the best controller to take for something seems to be the most awkward anyone could think of and the best game the one with the worst menus and controls, leaving aside the teachings of ergonomics and Human Computer Interaction as a whole cause it takes "more skill".
I'll have to think about that.
So why is swimming still a sport when people have boats?Dexter111 said:No, why would they? They got their legs lolinternetzealot1 said:Well are all the other runners doing the race in the wheelchair? Hmm?
That's the point xD