People only don't like camping because they end up dieing from someone camping. Everyone finds an excuse to the loss of a game.
Well, that would depend. If he's got a supply of magical one-way portable walls [sometimes known as 'BF2 Claymores'] even a real sniper probably wouldn't bother moving. Plus it would depend on if he actually can relocate easily from his current position without exposing himself. He might also be banking on being able to shoot his enemies before they can shoot him / figure out where he is / report his position to a third party as opposed to mobility to keep him alive.Iron Mal said:In my opinion a good sniper should be able to take a shot, move to another location, take another shot, move to another location and so on and so forth (you know, what actual real life snipers would do in a battle).
While it is true that people will often find an excuse for why it was someone else's fault I will draw the line for this at campers because, along with excessive use of sniper rifles, grenades and other unsporting 1-hit kills that most games will happily hand you, getting killed by them doesn't show a lack of skill on your part as much of a lack of luck and the absence of a sense of sportsmanship from the killer.HE Starwind said:People only don't like camping because they end up dieing from someone camping. Everyone finds an excuse to the loss of a game.
I see the point you're making but I still have to disagree, if nothing else wasn't the gilly suit in CoD4 and MW2 supposed to enable snipers to subtlely move from position to another (if used effectively and if the person in question knows what they're doing)?Evil Tim said:Well, that would depend. If he's got a supply of magical one-way portable walls [sometimes known as 'BF2 Claymores'] even a real sniper probably wouldn't bother moving. Plus it would depend on if he actually can relocate easily from his current position without exposing himself. He might also be banking on being able to shoot his enemies before they can shoot him / figure out where he is / report his position to a third party as opposed to mobility to keep him alive.Iron Mal said:In my opinion a good sniper should be able to take a shot, move to another location, take another shot, move to another location and so on and so forth (you know, what actual real life snipers would do in a battle).
The bedded-down sniper in a prepared position he doesn't move from happens just as often as the mobile kind.
Yes, but you'll find plenty of historical accounts of snipers who counted on concealment to save them rather than moving; one such event is shown in the docu-drama Band of Brothers, for example. A sniper who's surrounded [as game snipers usually are] would be wary of relocating since he doesn't know the new location will be any safer, or that he won't be ambushed along the way. It's fine if he's somewhere like a series of interconnected rooftops with handy chimneys and collapsed sections that let him move around, less so if he's in, say, a tower with no surrounding cover.Iron Mal said:I see the point you're making but I still have to disagree, if nothing else wasn't the gilly suit in CoD4 and MW2 supposed to enable snipers to subtlely move from position to another (if used effectively and if the person in question knows what they're doing)?
I don't like it when people camp, but it is fair. The fact is if you know someone is camping, does it not help you to realise he could be around every corner? If people choose to camp they can.Iron Mal said:While it is true that people will often find an excuse for why it was someone else's fault I will draw the line for this at campers because, along with excessive use of sniper rifles, grenades and other unsporting 1-hit kills that most games will happily hand you, getting killed by them doesn't show a lack of skill on your part as much of a lack of luck and the absence of a sense of sportsmanship from the killer.HE Starwind said:People only don't like camping because they end up dieing from someone camping. Everyone finds an excuse to the loss of a game.
My usual rule for judging what I feel is fair in a game or not is as follows:
Imagine you are playing splitscreen (LAN for those of you on PC) with a friend or sibling, now imagine that your friend did something like camp for the entire game (you're just playing for fun yet he's still using a tactic that's often defended by people who claim 'it helps me win'), would you be slightly annoyed after enough repeated deaths in this way? Do you think it's fair? Would he think it would be fair if you did it to him?
If it would piss off someone you're playing with in person then why do you think that simply being in a different country will make them see things your way?
M40 =/= equal sniper.firedfns13 said:M40 w/ Acog, Wetwork. Destroy.FROGGEman2 said:How else do you play with a sniper
?
Like, how?
You don't need to camp ever. Camping is just lazy and an excuse for no skill.
i would have taken your point seriously i you hadn't said 'defensible' at the end!Avykins said:Fuck that. I do not care if people whine. Real battle I would hide behind some rocks and just pop off a shot every now and then. Besides finding the perfect spot takes a lot of work. Finding a good defensible position that also has a good vantage point is damn near a artform.
Explain your reasoning in light of the following:FROGGEman2 said:M40 =/= equal sniper.
Hahahah what? i would so smack ur bottom in a game without killcam.Flying-Emu said:In my experience, a stationary sniper is a dead sniper.