Poll: How to please everyone and stop wars. It may work.
- Thread starter Federalist92
- Start date
People with NEVER be at peace. Its not in our nature. There will always be some reason for war, no matter how ridiculous.
Worse, he's a Brit (but it's OK, the "southerners" persecute the English which is the name of the people that live a bit north of the Midlands and a south of the Artic) [it's a joke OP - it's a reference to that comment in the "should the EU become one nation" thread].Fronken said:
OP:
As has already been pointed out what you list is a mix of economic systems and a mix of political systems which are not mutually exclusive, so the premise is flawed right from the start.
Actually, before I continue seriously, what is it with you and trying to merge all countries into one super-commune (first wanting to unite Europe, now the entire world)? Do you not understand that people value their heritage, value the minutiae differences between different socialist democratic republic taxation systems? Humanity has competition hard-coded into it's DNA and no simplistic system could overcome it.
The biggest problem with a 6-nation world would be (aside from language, racism, religion, taxation, resources, international politics) that no-one could agree on a fair representational parliament in any of the 6 nations, because you'd have people from thousands of different creeds, millions of different tax systems and each and every person with a different desire on what money should be spent on, what services should be supplied and so on. You would possibly create more war by inducing eternal civil conflicts by forcing so many different thinkers together into so few systems.
Well, no...I was thinking of a litterFat Man Spoon said:
But I guess you can get kittens...they're not very evil, though.
NEVER COMPRISE! NOT EVEN IN FACE OF ARMAGEDDON! /switches off Rorschach fanboyismnotsosavagemessiah said:
But yeah, I 100% agree with what you've posted.
Please, say WHY Australia would be better off as an anarchist place.
You obviously know very little about politics and economy.
Theocracy in the Middle East? I laugh. That's the single worst place to set up a theocracy.
Asia should be socialist? Yes, let the Japanese be socialist, see what happens then.
You're also mixing political views with economic views. It's entire plausible to have a Senate, like your S. America and still be Capitalist. Hell, a ton of countries are like that. Plus, only a Senate? Who would watch over the Senate? You need to divide the powers. Go read Bodin, Machiavelli, and John Locke.
A 100% nation would suffer insane inflation, as there would be no state to keep on leash on ridiculous prices and monopolies.
And you left out Communism, which I disagree with, but is quite more popular than monarchy and theocracy.
You obviously know very little about politics and economy.
Theocracy in the Middle East? I laugh. That's the single worst place to set up a theocracy.
Asia should be socialist? Yes, let the Japanese be socialist, see what happens then.
You're also mixing political views with economic views. It's entire plausible to have a Senate, like your S. America and still be Capitalist. Hell, a ton of countries are like that. Plus, only a Senate? Who would watch over the Senate? You need to divide the powers. Go read Bodin, Machiavelli, and John Locke.
A 100% nation would suffer insane inflation, as there would be no state to keep on leash on ridiculous prices and monopolies.
And you left out Communism, which I disagree with, but is quite more popular than monarchy and theocracy.
Where are we getting these underlings?Neonbob said:
I never specified how I'm acquiring said kittens.
Hehehe...