The Touch is crazy expensive, but also the only product in the iPod range that I think can even start to go toward justifying it's price cost. I have a 3rd and 4th generation Touch, and I've found both to be fantastic.Marter said:I've got a Touch. I really like it. The apps are definitely worth it.
I know I can disassociate PCs from my library at large (thats carried around on my iPod), so I assume I could do the same for music over iTunes as well? I've never really had a problem were I've absolutely had to transfer my music onto a PC that can't have access.x0ny said:There is a "five" limit, and it is based on machine. You can play music purchased with a specific iTunes Store account on up to FIVE different computers at any given time. Each one is registered with the account, and when you reach five, you cannot add any more.tiredinnuendo said:Define "transfer". I haven't bought stuff off iTunes yet, because honestly I'm not really a fan, but this is information I don't have.
- J
My 30GB 5th Gen Classic lasted nearly four years with fairly heavy use and occasional mistreatment (dropping, being left laying around on the floor, using in the rain etc) before finally succumbing when it fell out of my pocket and bounced down a whole flight of stairs. It'd be perfectly usable with a new hard drive in it, but the battery life was getting a bit feeble and I needed a capacity upgrade so I just replaced the whole thing. My current 160GB 6th Gen Classic is nearly a year old and it's great. The touchpad perhaps isn't as sensitive as I'd like, but that's hardly a dealbreaker. Long story short: it'll die if you're trying to kill it. If you don't grossly mistreat it, good chance you'll be fine.KimberlyGoreHound said:My biggest concern is the hardware of the Classic being a mini hard drive, and the Touch being flash memory, I'm wondering if the Classic would have a tendency to encounter problems sooner than the Touch, or if with proper handling, it'll be just fine.DataSnake said:It really depends what you want. If you only intend to use it to store music and video, go with the classic, since it has 160GB of storage and costs less than the 64GB touch.
Your hyperlink doesn't work, but I'll search around for it on google. I can appreciate why it's a fantastic model, in business terms, but in has turned me from a hardcore Apple fan into a cynical critic 8/ .Koroviev said:[url = http://arstechnica.com/apple/guides/2010/10/the-21st-century-guide-to-platform-trolling-apple-edition.ars]Here[/url] is an interesting article, published by Ars Technica, concerning Apple's often frustrating business model. It's fairly long, but it kept my attention.Marowit said:Classic - Hate
Planned obsolescence is a business model I absolutely abhor, and there is no one that does it better than Apple. The only Apple product I had that lasted for more than 2 years was the original shuffle, yeah the one that was a white-usb-stick with a play button, and as someone who was a big fan of Apple I can say I know I won't be buying anymore Apple products.
Don't get me wrong, I really like a lot of their program/OS features, but oh man I cannot stand their business model.
The Classic is next to be phased out so if you want some long term support via updates, go with the Touch.KimberlyGoreHound said:Alright, I'm looking at getting an iPod, either the Classic 160GB or Touch 64GB (both current generation), and I'm looking for some advice from iPod owners. If you've had problems with one of the above, please let me know - or if you have one of them and think it's absolutely fabulous, please respond. Your input is valued.
The poll doesn't want to cooperate. The options are (top to bottom):
Classic - love it
Classic - hate it
Touch - love it
Touch - hate it
Misc answers such as iPod shuffle, Zune or whateverthefuckelse are fine too.
Oh, sorry about that.Marowit said:Your hyperlink doesn't work, but I'll search around for it on google. I can appreciate why it's a fantastic model, in business terms, but in has turned me from a hardcore Apple fan into a cynical critic 8/ .Koroviev said:[url = http://arstechnica.com/apple/guides/2010/10/the-21st-century-guide-to-platform-trolling-apple-edition.ars]Here[/url] is an interesting article, published by Ars Technica, concerning Apple's often frustrating business model. It's fairly long, but it kept my attention.Marowit said:Classic - Hate
Planned obsolescence is a business model I absolutely abhor, and there is no one that does it better than Apple. The only Apple product I had that lasted for more than 2 years was the original shuffle, yeah the one that was a white-usb-stick with a play button, and as someone who was a big fan of Apple I can say I know I won't be buying anymore Apple products.
Don't get me wrong, I really like a lot of their program/OS features, but oh man I cannot stand their business model.
Because I have a ton of music, and don't want to change my playlist every single day (or a few times a day).Tankichi said:Why do you need 64gb?KimberlyGoreHound said:I can't find any other MP3 players that go up to the storage which I require (minimum 64GB). If you know any, please point me in their direction.Ephraim J. Witchwood said:Get something more generic, like a SanDisk Sansa or something. As long as it doesn't use iTunes. iTunes is malware that Apple gets away with...
^^ Agreed.Ephraim J. Witchwood said:Get something more generic, like a SanDisk Sansa or something. As long as it doesn't use iTunes. iTunes is malware that Apple gets away with...