Same. My MBP makes all the tasks you do 10000 times a day on a computer so simple that I get frustrated when I have to use a different kind of computer. It streamlines everything, I guess. Sure I can't play many games on it, but I never intended to play any games on it when I got it.Blitzwarp said:I have a console for gaming and I only use my MacBook to do creative things (Pages, Photoshop, iMovie, etc.) so I find Mac OS 100% perfect for my needs. It's fast, intuitive, and not bogged down with all of the errors Windows has to contend with. (No, I'm not saying a Mac is 100% bug-free, but in my two years of Mac ownership my MB has not crashed once. Compare this to my old Windows laptop, which crashed nearly every day.)
Tubez said:May I ask how you come to these conclusions?
*Comparatively fragile hardware
*Tendency to overheat
*One foot ahead
(technologically)
??
Here I'm sort of picking on Dell. Also, my Mac is covered in a hard shell (what i presume to be titanium, not sure) and when things hit it, they break, not the computer. I had an HP before it and I broke the CD drive just by picking it up.*Comparatively fragile hardware
I see people always needing to take a break from playing games, as their computer will overheat. In fact, it burns to touch. My little computer stays cool even during chase scenes in the latest AAA games.*Tendency to overheat
Some of the technology Apple puts into their products is pretty amazing. The evolution of the iPod is a proper example. PCs tend to lack that sort of fancy new-technology feel, and are much cheaper as a result, but simply less flashy or impressive. It's all a matter of opinion.*One foot ahead
(technologically)
This thread is open for you to post your own, so by all means feel free to suggest new bullets or to remove some seemingly biased or untrue ones ^^Cingal said:I think you may need to validate your pros and cons. Don't seem entirely agreeable.
You're mostly correct, but with one important oversight.TheTaco007 said:Let's put it this way:
MACs are for doing professional work, like digital graphic design, and programming and stuff like that. They're built to create things, and be serious tools for working.
PCs are for having fun, playing games, and making mods of things.
Neither one is "better" they just focus on different things. It's a preference, and it'd be wrong to state one's preference/opinion as fact.
Feel free to disagree, but a little more explanation than "no" would help. I'd like to know why you think what you do, not that you think it in the first place.kingcat1 said:'Exceptional hardware' no , just no.
My laptop never overheats and I do not know anyone that needs to stop playing games cause theirs computers will overheat otherwise. And I thought we were talking about computers not Ipods which is a mp3. If you pay the same amount of money on a PC laptop as you do on a MAC you can get a laptop with a hard shell.Faladorian said:Tubez said:May I ask how you come to these conclusions?
*Comparatively fragile hardware
*Tendency to overheat
*One foot ahead
(technologically)
??Here I'm sort of picking on Dell. Also, my Mac is covered in a hard shell (what i presume to be titanium, not sure) and when things hit it, they break, not the computer. I had an HP before it and I broke the CD drive just by picking it up.*Comparatively fragile hardware
I see people always needing to take a break from playing games, as their computer will overheat. In fact, it burns to touch. My little computer stays cool even during chase scenes in the latest AAA games.*Tendency to overheat
Some of the technology Apple puts into their products is pretty amazing. The evolution of the iPod is a proper example. PCs tend to lack that sort of fancy new-technology feel, and are much cheaper as a result, but simply less flashy or impressive. It's all a matter of opinion.*One foot ahead
(technologically)
Ah, yes, forgot to mention that. Thanks.JeanLuc761 said:You're mostly correct, but with one important oversight.TheTaco007 said:Let's put it this way:
MACs are for doing professional work, like digital graphic design, and programming and stuff like that. They're built to create things, and be serious tools for working.
PCs are for having fun, playing games, and making mods of things.
Neither one is "better" they just focus on different things. It's a preference, and it'd be wrong to state one's preference/opinion as fact.
PC's are used for creative, professional work as well. PC is the industry standard for game development and digital effects, Mac is more for the graphic design field.
It might be a little extreme to call out Apple as a company, but it is true that their advertizing goes out of its way to appeal to hipsters, while hiding the fact that their computers are significantly more expensive for hardware that is not quite cutting edge.ciortas1 said:Wrong. You're telling me shitty movies, games and so on are not supposed to exist, yet they do. There are a couple of things you could think through, like marketing and the non-discriminative nature of the average consumer, for one.Exterminas said:If there was a objective way of deterimnate which product is best, then there wouldn't be two products.
PC, all the way through. Macs are horribly overpriced and not any more functional, in fact, they're lacking in functionality compared to PCs. And Apple is a bad, bad company.
Fair enough, I realize that viruses can be easy to avoid and I usually have a good mind as to what to avoid. Also, I did mention I use windows myself, but on a Mac computer.MiketheBassMan said:If "amgtheygetvirusues" is your biggest problem with a computer running Windows, you ought to be more careful with what you do online. My computer is protected solely by Windows Defender, and I have absolutely no problems with viruses or malware of any kind.
I like thisJust my $0.02.