Only "metal" I don't like is nu-metal, but I do even listen to some of that (when I'm in the mood for something that isn't metal).
love that thingMilk said:Relevant:
http://mapofmetal.com/
Um...what?Jedi-Hunter4 said:That's not metalcore...... Most music bodys class them as Deathcore or death metal. Where's the very obvious break downs, where are the harmonic guitars? Where's the clear singing? I'm not sure of the proper terminology but I'm get to see a metalcore band that sings like that all for the entire song and defiantly not where the singer does that like throat scream.mitchell271 said:I understand the hate towards that. Fuck that shit.MisterGobbles said:
This is the reason people hate metalcore.
The only thing this shares with metalcore is the dropped tuning, you know like most metal bands?
The problem is, sir, one is closer to noise, the other music. Birds and dogs produce sounds driven by their emotions. The difference between that and music is the weight given to rationally thinking through the sense of the sounds. And being driven by emotions doesn't have to mean consciously so.EscapeGoat said:And yet, surely you must allow that music can and must be driven by emotion - even anger (for example, the development of punk was based on anger at an existing political system) and that this emotion must come above compositional shape?Blood Brain Barrier said:They just aren't good musicians. To elaborate, it sounds like they put their anger into the song without bothering to give it much compositional shape. It lacks character and thought. The good kind of metal, even the really crude stuff, at least has an idea of what it wants musically. Even the label "metal-core" betrays this attitude - two types of music smashed together not because it makes sense musically but because "we like them".
The synthesis of metal was surely different from that of metalcore, qualitatively. Metal was born of the elements of previous music, as metalcore was, and as all music must be. But you must admit that metal was accompanied and driven by a strong direction, if that direction was given only as a reaction to certain attitudes of the modern era that it found distasteful. It had a strong sense of withdrawing from one ethos or set of values and that withdrawal is what defined it, gave it new life and energy, and did so unconsciously. This way of making music is completely different from combining disparate musical elements which are found to be pleasing into a "new" genre, and I would say it's why metalcore sounds forced. I would even say that metalcore is decidedly UNemotional, because it thinks music is like cooking, where you can make anything by throwing things into the pot without realising that in some ways it is music that writes itself using the musician as a medium.To create a song where structure is placed higher than the emotional force behind the music strikes me as ineffective and detrimental to your music. Also, why is the idea of a fusion genre such a bad thing? Why is blending two genres because "we like them" such a terrible idea? An artist wants to fuse two genres they enjoy, why is this negative? Yes, there is the risk that the genre comes out bland but without such risks being taken, its reasonable to assume metal (being, originally, a fusion of blues-style musical theory and hard rock's musical sentiment and instruments) wouldn't exist, let alone all the subgenres of it that we have today.
You need to explain what this is before you get a warning friend.Milk said:Relevant:
http://mapofmetal.com/
It is beyond my imagination why people liek you exist.Thyunda said:Dude. The Korn/Skrillex tunes are badass. Like. Seriously badass.Strazdas said:I dont even consider a metacore to be a genre. its just a label stupid people made up.
Korn started as nu-metal, went into emo-pop and now is doung dubstep (im not kidding, the latest album is cooperation with skrillex). Korn is the perfect example of how a good band can go the worst possible way.Vault101 said:just what the hell is wrong with nu-metal anyway?
Korn arent bad...neither is linkin park...I also like linkin parks new stuff
Linkin park started great, lately they were weering into pop as well.
you just had to pick the worst exmaples didnt you?
agreed, it wasn't exactly "old linkin park" for thousand suns, but i definitely enjoyed it 100x more than minutes to midnight.Vault101 said:lving things wasnt bad but nowhere near as good as thousand sunsDangit2019 said:...and then they made Living Things. Again, just for a good measure,
mabye its because I have a thing for electronics but I love the dark synths in thousands suns...The Catalyst reminds me so much of ME3 or Deaus Ex...and I also love blackout with its crazy anger
I'd say their worst album is minutes to midnight...too damn soft
so because people like mash ups...they can't fathom to possibly exist.Strazdas said:It is beyond my imagination why people liek you exist.Thyunda said:Dude. The Korn/Skrillex tunes are badass. Like. Seriously badass.Strazdas said:I dont even consider a metacore to be a genre. its just a label stupid people made up.
Korn started as nu-metal, went into emo-pop and now is doung dubstep (im not kidding, the latest album is cooperation with skrillex). Korn is the perfect example of how a good band can go the worst possible way.Vault101 said:just what the hell is wrong with nu-metal anyway?
Korn arent bad...neither is linkin park...I also like linkin parks new stuff
Linkin park started great, lately they were weering into pop as well.
you just had to pick the worst exmaples didnt you?
I figured you;d understand the concept of subjecivity in art and that people like very different thingsStrazdas said:It is beyond my imagination why people liek you exist.
genre itself is kind of pointless when you think about it, all it does is fuel preconceptions the stuff I tend to like the most bends genre somtimesgmaverick019 said:OT: Meh, to be honest i don't really care what "genre" a song is really, each song is individually different upon itself.
So... you're telling us you JUST noticed this?mitchell271 said:I was reading a few articles on [a href="http://www.metalsucks.net/"]MetalSucks[/a] and I noticed a pattern. Most metalheads don't seem to like metalcore.
They can exist. they do, obviuosly. its jut that my brain is human, and thus fallable, therefore i fail to imagine how would anyone like that. it is solely MY problem, for my brain is inferior in this case.gmaverick019 said:so because people like mash ups...they can't fathom to possibly exist.
perhaps that's why i like nu metal and the korn/skrillex mash up, i can actually fathom artists actually breaking away from their respective genre/roots.
I understand the concept of subjectivity, i understand that such people exist, i just fail to imagine it. see above.Vault101 said:I figured you;d understand the concept of subjecivity in art and that people like very different things
thats...pretty arrogantidon said:Anyway, you like core, whatever. Just as long as you don't go around saying it's any good, then whatever man. That kinda stuff can be a transition into heavier, actual metal, so hopefully that's where you're at.
why can disturbed fit under Nu-metal? theres no "rap" influence thereKendale Anderson said:... with Disturbed (can be considered Nu Metal) .