Poll: Yahtzee changes joke in ZP video

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Apparently, the joke was offensive because it could cause mental distress to MtF transsexuals who watch it.

I don't particularly buy this argument (are they undistressed now that he's talking about crossdressers? Seriously?) but it's Yahtzee's choice to change it.

I don't think it was worth the fuss (I don't think having people hate you and a higher death rate makes you immune to jokes), but people will yell at you for not being as dogmatic about things as they are, so it's not worth the bother to tell them it's not worth the bother.
 

LetalisK

New member
May 5, 2010
2,769
0
0
Scott Rothman said:
He was apologizing for his use of the word 'tranny' and "I realise now that this was a poor choice of words, because some people who identify as female have cocks. Lord knows I have nothing to gain from enforcing gender roles, 'cos I don't like cars OR football."

He wasn't apologizing for mocking homophobes.
I know, I was being sarcastic as the ones who are the butt of the joke should be offended, if anyone. Not to imply that I would care if a homophobe was offended by the joke.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Moth_Monk said:
Self censorship is the worst kind of censorship. The implications of it are the most sinister. It suggests a climate of fear.
The fuck? That's quite a leap. How do you figure?

It's not unthinkable a comedian could just decide to change their joke. Those guys are their own worst critics.
 

xmbts

Still Approved by Shock
Legacy
May 30, 2010
20,800
37
53
Country
United States
Well if he himself wanted to change it then by all rights he can. People go on about changing something as a sign that the PC crowd is about to stone them to death but this site does allow for quite a bit of freedom from what I've seen, at the most slapping an age confirmation before a video.

If Jim Sterling can show a man killing himself I think ZP can make a transsexual joke, and if the person who made that joke feels uncomfortable with making it than that's his own business to take back.
 

twohundredpercent

New member
Dec 20, 2011
106
0
0
They shouldn't even bother changing their material or apologizing. Apologies are not effective in these situations.

Has anyone forgiven Michael Richards or Daniel Tosh or Tracy Morgan because they apologized? Not likely. They're seen as bowing to pressure. Not as people who sincerely want to reconcile with those they offended. They lose some of their dignity and the people looking for things to target move on to something else.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
Weeeeellll, and this week, it's "German Scat Porn". I wonder if there's any Germans going to be taking offense over that comment!
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
I'm not sure how including transexuals in a joke that isn't about demeaning them is particularly offensive. Are we not supposed to talk about them or make references to them? Are we supposed to pretend like they don't exist or that a pre-op transexual female doesn't have male genitals?

I'd understand offense if he was somehow calling them a bad thing or something along those lines. But just referring to a specific group of people engaged in a sexual act isn't offensive. I get that transexuals are often marginalized and people treat them badly. That's awful and needs to stop. But pick actual existing battles if you're going to fight any battles at all.

My only thoughts regarding why this could be offensive would be regarding the notion that a man engaged in sexual activities with a transgendered female is performing homosexual activities. While gender-wise the transexual isn't performing a homosexual act, the cis-male would be sex-wise. Again the joke is about the cismale in this instance, not the transexual.I'm sorry but the joke stands, if you're a man and you like cock in and around ye' ol' face, you're gay. Doesn't matter whose it is (with the singular exception of your own, I suppose). Not that being gay is a bad thing. Just what it is. The notion of homosexuality does begin to blur where transexuals are concerned, but not on the Cis side of the fence. As a gay female once told me. "I'd love to go out with someone like you, but you've got a cock". I didn't know she was gay until that hilariously flippant coming out comment and we were great friends with everything in common and remained so up until graduation and we moved away (to give context to it). I bring this up to say that homosexuality is generally defined sexually (aka, the physical body as opposed to gender, the mental gender identity of the individual). That's why it's a sexual orientation specifically and how a transgendered individual is not necessarily a homosexual individual.

chinangel said:
I'm trans but I get annoyed when people say stuff like this and yes I heard it too and wasn't offended. What irritated me though is that fantasizing about a girl with a dick IS NOT GAY! It's actually a very heterosexual fantasy!
Firstly, I'm not sure if you're joking or not. No indicator of it being a joke so I'll assume this is serious. Forgive me If I'm wrong. Please understand that I mean no disrespect towards you and honestly believe that there is nothing wrong with you. Please keep that in mind for this discussion so that you don't have to feel like you're defending yourself or transexuals against me.

Second, fantasizing about a dick is not a heterosexual fantasy. I'm sorry, but that is decidedly less heterosexual every step you go in that direction. What is true is that heterosexuals may have homosexual fantasies. This particular fantasy is generally known to have a female who is female in every area of appearance except the one. There is also a difference between fantasy and action. It's important to know that there are two definitions for what male is thanks to a modern understanding of it whereas there used to be only one and transgenderism was shoved off to the side. The psychological male/female gender and the sexual maleness/femaleness (previously also called gender until the fluidity of gender identity became recognized and accepted). Homosexuality is not typically defined along the lines of pyschological gender. It is most commonly referred to along the lines of sexuality. This is perhaps why the term itself contains the term sexuality. A transgendered female's sexuality does not necessarily follow their gender. I've known of few individuals (originally physically male) who actually went post-op female while still happily married to their cisfemale wives. That is to say, happily married on their end. The wives usually had a significant problem with the physical change.
 
Jul 31, 2013
181
0
0
"Oh, Yahtzee made some very, very crude jokes about *NOUN* in his reviews!!! Seeing as how I'm *NOUN* and deeply offended, I demand that he changes all inappropriate jokes about *NOUN* in all of his videos, otherwise I'm going on a long rant, mister!!!"

The internet, bastion of free speech, last vanguard of anti-censorship!!!
 

twohundredpercent

New member
Dec 20, 2011
106
0
0
Oh my god. It just hit me. I don't think he was actually being criticized by actual pre-op transgenders. I'm thinking got the blowback from dickgirl fetishists insisting they were NOT GAY.

It all makes sense now.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
18,537
3,057
118
It's comedy. Comedy suspends morality. He didn't have to change it, and people didn't need to feel offended. He's already made fun of MY sexuality hundreds of time and I couldn't give a fuck about it, he's a hilarious guy.
 
Jan 27, 2011
3,740
0
0
I honestly don't care either way.

Was the joke in bad taste? Maybe. Should he have removed it when he realized it was in bad taste? Maybe? *shrug*

Besides, I take everything he says as straight up satire, so I don't get offended by anything he says. No matter what game he bashes, or how much he insinuates that everyone in Montreal is retarded, I just shrug and move on. (I live there, and he DID say that in his Splinter Cell conviction review).
 

BartyMae

New member
Apr 20, 2012
296
0
0
No, I don't think it was offensive enough to warrant being edited out...but that's probably not why it was edited out. I would think it was edited out because it upset a significant portion, (maybe a fifth? Completely made up number, but it was significant), which is typically something you don't want to do as an entertainer...so while I don't agree with people getting upset at him for something that was basically a non-issue, (it wasn't even a dig at transexuals...), I do agree with his decision to change it.
 

Blaster395

New member
Dec 13, 2009
514
0
0
While some people may think that all groups should be fair game in jokes, I disagree. It's a simple case of "Dude, too soon" considering that extremely high levels of discrimination of all forms are ongoing towards trans people.

It's like making 9/11 jokes right as the towers themselves collapse back in 2001.
 

Miss G.

New member
Jun 18, 2013
535
0
0
Honestly, to me, the joke was on the politician, not the people he gives blow jobs to, and the sign was shorthand for the directive in the actual game to make sure the peoples' M or F on their papers matched what they say/how they look, so I was shocked to find so many knee-jerk reaction posts when I watched the video later in the week and checked out the thread. It's like they drowned out the video as white noise up until those points and some people even made accounts just so they could try to get it taken down. Never in my relatively short time on this forum have I seen so many warnings, suspensions and bans in one thread. It really was just like the case with that guy who had to resign over using the word 'niggardly' in its correct usage just because the African-American listeners thought he said a racist remark about them and had a knee-jerk reaction to a word they apparently didn't even know the meaning of and I'm glad Yahtzee alluded to that in his Extra Punctuation article. And on the off chance that anyone gets on my case for saying it like that, I am black, though not African-American.

nig·gard·ly [nig-erd-lee]
adjective
1. reluctant to give or spend; stingy; miserly.
2. meanly or ungenerously small or scanty.
See, nothing at all about about race, just another word for a scrooge and unfortunately one that sounds too much like the slur. Same script, different cast with the video.