Not if I stab you first!koops128 said:You calling me deranged? I'll prove you wrong by stabbing you!
Not if I stab you first!koops128 said:You calling me deranged? I'll prove you wrong by stabbing you!
Something like if the person is downstairs you can't do anythign, but if they come upstairs reasonable force is allowed isn't it?Sam17 said:It wouldn't have ended there, self defence laws in the UK are not like the US, if you hypothetically beat someone up who comes into your house with a knife, you're a lot more likely to recieve a harsher sentence, even if you didn't use a weapon, if you draw even the smallest amount of blood, ie, you punch him in the nose and he gets a nosebleed, you'll probably be arrested and probably face jailtimeBrook claimed that Witkowski attacked him with a knife when he arrived, so he grabbed the knife taped to the door and stabbed him in the leg. That probably would have added up to an easy claim of self defense had it ended there
The only time you're truly allowed to defend yourself is if someone was to come into your bedroom
Pretty stupid I know, but our government believes they can stop gangs by banning certain colours...
What makes you assume that??Daemascus said:Im thinking theres more here than a text misunderstanding...Andy Chalk said:Predictive Text Error Leads to Fatal Stabbing
The court was told that Witkowski suffered 104 injuries, including stab wounds, cuts, bruises and slice marks on his hands.
I believe they're introducing a "think 25" thing, like the current "Think 21"darkknight9 said:This kind of thing wouldn't happen if there were stricter laws in the UK regarding 'knife control'.
(snicker!)
Seriously. Someone in this equation was a titch irrational.
As if knives aren't readily available to anyone who eats food to stay alive...bobby1361 said:I believe they're introducing a "think 25" thing, like the current "Think 21"darkknight9 said:This kind of thing wouldn't happen if there were stricter laws in the UK regarding 'knife control'.
(snicker!)
Seriously. Someone in this equation was a titch irrational.
Exactly what I came into this thread to post. Well-played, sir. Nuttier than a squirrel turd, that guy.PhunkyPhazon said:So apparently he really WAS a nutter. Go figure.
in the UK murder is pre-meditated attack resulting in death. Acts of passion are considered a loss of personal control and someone who isn't in control can only be found guilty of manslaughter.Jaime_Wolf said:...nutter seems to be quite the appropriate word here.
And are some of you seriously arguing that there aren't significant rights to self defence when someone got off on manslaughter for stabbing a man and then HUNTING HIM DOWN AND KILLING HIM WHILE HE RAN AWAY?
For the record, that's murder in almost any US court.